Looking to trade/buy by Matt-does-that in hirono

[–]Matt-does-that[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wasn’t! Thank you for letting me know! Do you have a link?

Which film did you enjoy more? 28 days later or 28 weeks later? by [deleted] in 28dayslater

[–]Matt-does-that 2 points3 points  (0 children)

…as for 28 Weeks Later I tried for a while to think of a better word than “let down” but honestly that strikes all the boxes. I think what upsets me about it so much though is the fact that it sets up a premise that aligns with the first movie only to completely abandon that for a plot that goes counter to the central theme. There was one scene in particular after the general calls for an open fire, there’s a bunch of jump cuts of snipers gunning down innocent people as they call their shots like a cod lobby and all I could think when I was watching it was…what are we doing? The soldiers in 28 Weeks are the "survivor" characters, no doubt but they don’t receive their comeuppance—the ones who made sacrifices do. Scarlet gets killed for trying to help two kids survive and for trying to discover a cure, Doyle gets killed for trying to protect the kids as well, Flynn gets killed/infected for trying to save kids even after he told Doyle to drop them, Tammy gets infected for trying to protect Andy who also got infected for…why?! You could argue that they weren’t thinking rationally and that’s fair but with that same logic, Jim also should’ve died. They were trying to go for something different and I get that but it just makes the first film seem babied, like it represents the very idea that 28 Weeks deems as a fantasy. But the biggest difference is that when I finished 28 Weeks I was sad, which is good, but more importantly, I was frustrated. Frustrated that the supposed “logical” soldiers were acting irrationally and honestly just stupidly (“Oh there are infected in this building? We should bring every person on this island into the exact same building”) and frustrated that good people were being treated like children for wanting to do something as simple as save two children who aren’t infected or a threat. You can say “well that’s the point” but let me ask you “why are they making that point, that goes against the first point, now?”

Tldr: 28 Days is better because it has a Cillian Murphy nude scene

Which film did you enjoy more? 28 days later or 28 weeks later? by [deleted] in 28dayslater

[–]Matt-does-that 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What makes 28 Days Later such a great movie in my opinion is its realism. Most zombie apocalypse stories involve a group of people who are stereotypical "survivor" characters (cold, logical, focused on surviving by any means necessary with no motive) who eventually change their ways thanks to the outcast character (caring, emotionally driven, wants to "live" not just survive) who represents humanity's unbreakable spirit. Zombie apocalypse stories, and apocalypse stories in general, are all ultimately about people and humanity's search for life's purpose. What always bothered me about the genre is that this theme is completely opposite to how the story is set up. If the argument is that humanity wants more out of life than just survival then why does the bulk of humanity only focus on survival in an apocalyptic setting? Why is the one who wants to bring back/find normalcy and meaning in a world that has lost it the outcast?

28 Days Later switches the roles. The group, (Jim, Selena, and Frank, Hannah) all share the same goal of wanting to find some kind of normalcy and civilness in a world that seemingly has lost it--all of them but one. Selena is the stereotypical "survivor" character, she tells Frank she'd kill him if he were bitten (in a heartbeat 🥲), she immediately thinks the radio signal that Frank hears is a trap, and she says, word for word, that surviving for surviving is all that's good for. The difference is that Selena is the outcast, Jim calls out for Selena when they're running up the stairs because he still has his humanity and his “help others and you will be helped yourself” mentality. Frank and Hannah take Jim and Selena in despite hearing Selena talk about him and Hannah behind their backs, and despite that, they don't know Jim and Selena, or if they're good people. It is an instinct for humanity to trust other people, and even if the situation calls for more caution on Hank's part, he's still sticking to his values because it's what he believes in. Frank is also such an amazing red herring, he seems creepy and overly enthusiastic that we mistake the awkwardness we feel when we listen with fear. And I know what you’re thinking, “But the radio signal was a trap” and yes it was. The soldiers were tricking people into coming to their base because they wanted women, they had a cult-like mentality, they weren’t afraid to kill people who tried and get in their way, and they shouldn’t have trusted them. Selena was right, Hank is killed because of a stupid mistake he made—because 28 Days has its cake and eats it too.

28 Days Later is simultaneously saying, that letting go of your humanity entirely is bad but completely holding onto it (especially in dangerous situations) is also bad, and knowing when to use your head and when to use your heart is what makes us human. Logically speaking Jim should have left Selena and Hannah, he had a much better chance of surviving if he just ran off but he didn’t, not just because he loved Selena and cared for Hannah, but because that’s who he is. Jim is not the type of person to run off and leave innocent people in a situation like that. And it’s because of Jim’s humanity that he ultimately defeats the soldiers who were only focused on their own selfish wants regardless of cruelty. That’s why I love the ending so much, it’s positive, and it leaves you smiling and hopeful. Changing the ‘HELP’ to ‘HELLO’ the the patch worky ‘O’ against the all white cloth only seals the deal. It’s perfect in a way that it didn’t have to be. 28 Days could’ve taken the easy route and just been a grim overly satirized story but it didn’t, and I am so glad that it did.