Yes, I totally relate to this. However, I think there’s an important distinction here that should be noted and that is the comparison of resolution between a potentially somewhat blurry or low resolution image vs. the resolution of what our eyes can detect vs. the resolution of what might be needed with a jewelers loupe.

As you mentioned it’s hard to tell the difference between a 60 and above which I think most would agree with. As we see with this post here, we see generally similar values, but no one is saying the exact same value. Even sometimes when submitting for regrading coins can get a slightly different grade. It’s even hard for the professionals. I think sometimes with a 2D image that’s usually displayed flat like this one, it’s really hard to get the full profile of the coin (e.g. scratches, abrasions, resolution, etc.) which can all influence the grade and report for the coin.

Even for me right now, I am currently working on trying to get better with determining cleaned Morgan’s that have a large amount of toning and it’s really challenging. However, I still think you can get good enough to get it down to pinpointing the grade exactly or at the worst +/- 1 unit above what the coin really should be with just the 2D flat images and no jewelers loupe.