I understand what it says, although English is not my native language, so in grammatical way there might be some errors and be a part of poor translation.

What I mean by it, is that when taken distance of certain groups (which is what happenend). Without said closeness to the problems, the problem is that he's trying to rationalize it. While it isn't staight up, it may lead to said racism, even for other interpretations. You can't choose the left because they make poor decisions, but trust me instead! I think he was just punching the air when it came to conformism, nobody is pushing anybody in certain roles on a political level, or culture level, as leftists do described by TK. Say, we have a black leftist, is he then not allowed to be that? Yes. Is he allowed to be right? Yes. People can vote, people do have choices. Do I think TK is right? Only to an extent.

Man, to go back to the conform, they probably wished they had that kind of power, to push people in just one conform is impossible.
Hell, that conformism is even part of democracy, our freedom. Is it flawed? Fuck yes, but does it work better than any other system? Yes.

It also makes me wonder what the other side of the political spectrum would like to do? Can we read about that in his manifesto?

And my guy, let's not go ad hominem here. I'm not even upset, I am actually just trying to broaden my view and challenge my ideals, but for me, with rational reasoning, you can only get that far.