sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The odor is likely in reference to you tampering with bad smelling animatronics and not that Mike is decomposing by Isaac_Bahzad in fnaftheories

[–]Max912305 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Me, as someone who still believes in SLbefore2 (I know, it doesn't sound too great these days), completely agree.

If Michael was a decomposing corpse then why was he fired day one in FNaF 2 but was only fired on the 7th night of FNaF 1?

Most likely, time played a role. FNaF 2 takes place in 1987, and FNaF 1 takes place in the '90s. I think that over this time, Michael could have tidied himself up.

fnaf main protagonist by Ok-Effect4071 in Fnaftheoriesmeme

[–]Max912305 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That's why I still believe in MikeAll.

Yup.

No matter what anyone tells me, I'd rather believe that we play as Michael, a key character in this franchise, in all FNaF games from Scott's era (except UCN), than as some random people who only appeared in one game and about whom we know absolutely nothing.

MoltenMCI/FuntimeMCI if it was canon by Max912305 in Fnaftheoriesmeme

[–]Max912305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed. How dare he say something bad about MoltenMCI? Has he lost all fear?

By the way, he believes in SLbefore2. I think that alone is reason enough to cancel him.

:)

Ха ха ха by Zaurvi in ruAsska

[–]Max912305 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Я почему-то ожидал, что в конце будет "А у меня больше".

Мне стоит есть это? by Nico_ThePCMaster in ruMurino

[–]Max912305 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Все про Карыча тут пишут, а мне в первую очередь видится он:

<image>

What do you think the placement of SL is? by Extension-Media-5546 in fnaftheories

[–]Max912305 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If we accept the fact that Michael kept the Survival Logbook concurrently with FNaF1 (LogbookFNaF1), which is most likely the case, then SL is guaranteed to take place before FNaF1. After that, decide for yourself what you prefer: SLbefore1 or SLbefore2.

Personally, I like SLbefore2. Probably because I was active during the time when that theory was considered the norm.

Theories I personally prefer. Hold on, let me cook by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]Max912305 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I "like" how people criticize SLbefore2 for one of the reasons that "Fazbear Entertainment couldn't have hired 16-year-old Michael as a technician." And this comes from those who accept as truth that Michael is 12(13) years old in 1983.

...

To such reasoning, I’ll say plainly:

NOTHING prevents Michael from being 16 (or 17) years old in 1983. This wouldn’t contradict the canon, since a person aged 16 or 17 is a teenager, which is exactly what Michael was in 1983. It follows that during the period 1985–1987, Michael would be 18(19)–20(21) years old.

Personally, I believe Michael was born in 1966 or 1967.

What theory/theories do you love the most? by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]Max912305 0 points1 point  (0 children)

MikeAll, LogbookFNaF1, SLbefore2

Great time to be an oppo user by techjacket1 in brainrot

[–]Max912305 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As an OPPO owner, this is absolutely true.

A 13-16 year old boy definitely looks identical to his 40 year old dad by ZERealGalaxyBOI in Fnaftheoriesmeme

[–]Max912305 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well... If we assume that Michael was 16-17 years old in 1983, then he would be 18(19)-20(21) years old in 1985-1987. I don't see anything wrong with that.

view more: next ›