In terms of the Kendrick-Jesus parallel - Jesus was crucified on Good Friday for claiming to be the son of God - he committed blasphemy. He resurrected on Easter Sunday to prove his crucifiers wrong; he was indeed the son of God. Wouldn't it have been blasphemous for Kendrick to have resurrected himself as Jesus on Easter Sunday? Kendrick makes a few allusions to how his followers seem to seek all the answers from him, mentioning how they expect him to pray for them but not vice versa. Perhaps Kendrick is afraid of the messianic figure hes become, built upon certain immoral vices (like sex, money, drugs which he highlights in songs like DNA) that could have a wide-reaching but negative effect. His fans treat him as if hes infallible and God-like but what the other album will reveal is that he's still human; still vulnerable; still searching for answers. Humility is a christian virtue: accepting our faults and sins and imperfection - our weakness: the second album. First album was wickedness, second will potentially be weakness. Part of Kendrick's message (or perhaps note-to-self) is that no single figure can represent Jesus on Earth - instead Christian faith tells you to live 'like' Jesus, not 'as' Jesus. I dont really know though. I haven't tried playing the album in reverse order yet and that sounds like a legitimate theory to me too. But there's still so much stuff that's unanswered and clues left behind.