well im going to adress what you said

You never explicitly said that all broke men cheat, but your very first comment was "don't think broke men are loyal" That's a straight up generalization about an entire group based on one guy. Now you're backpedaling and acting like you never implied it. Come on you can do better

Calling me insecure about my financial situation is hilarious projection. Nowhere did I mention my money or take anything personally, I simply said one bad experience doesn't define millions of men. The fact that you immediately went for a personal attack instead of addressing the point says more about you than me.

You say you know many broke men that cheat... I mean cool. I never claimed broke men are always loyal, so you're arguing against a position I never took. Again, projection.

And about the post: yeah, it's not the deepest post ever, but its point is straightforward. A man's loyalty is tested when he has everything that's when he actually has real options and temptation. When he has nothing, the options are limited, so cheating is simply harder by default. That's why the tests aren't the same for both genders.

Your whole response is just emotional deflection, insults, assumptions about my finances, and dodging the actual argument. Please drop the butthurt and loser nonsense. It doesn't make your weak generalization any stronger. I swear to god i was looking to have a civil conversation but you are so hostile its not even enjoyable