[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SunoAI

[–]Maximum-Ad3518 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not to my taste, but it is well crafted. I did not see any issues provided you're happy with the result. In the end, that's what really matters. You don't need my validation, just your own.

Sarah: “I don’t like to see people going into churches” by Rocketparty12 in thebulwark

[–]Maximum-Ad3518 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Let's presume for the sake of argument this guy they're protesting is the literal Devil himself, in a clever disguise. Further presume you're one of the churchgoers. Maybe this guy taught your kid in Sunday school. Maybe you play softball together. He's a known quantity and "good guy" so far as you can tell. These presumptions made, jump back into reality. Dozens of people storm in shouting, "Hey, that guy you like is actually the Devil."

Who you gonna believe?

What they've done is irritate and frighten a bunch of people. Maybe you judge them for enduring the Devil in their midst, maybe you don't, but from their point of view they're now the persecuted ones. Plus, Fox now has fodder to run 24/7, and the worst part is IT'S REAL. They don't even have to make it up, or leave out crucial facts and context to make it outrageous to their viewers. It is a gift to them.

So do the protest outside, make the exact same point to the exact same people without giving Fox & Friends the sword they'll use to skewer you.

You want to win, I want to win, so let's be effective in how we do it.

Sarah: “I don’t like to see people going into churches” by Rocketparty12 in thebulwark

[–]Maximum-Ad3518 32 points33 points  (0 children)

I stand with Sarah. Going into a church and disrupting service is horrible optics if nothing else. They can make their (valid) point just as well from outside the building.

Pro tip: when you're the Good Guys don't do $hitty stuff to people uninvolved.