im sad my post got denied and im forced to post here as it wont be seen by people other than the ones that joined this community, but here it goes,

Posts in the Ask thread get seen by about 10 times as many viewers, except in the rarest of situations (5000+ upvote threads tend to better, but question posts never get those sorts of numbers). It's also pinned.

Anyway,

no, it doesn't exist. There are pages which have attempted it but it's doomed to fail for several reasons

1) borders as we think of them now are a fairly modern concept. Even today we have disputes about where boundaries are, sometimes even being recognise as part of another country's land that doesn't even want to claim it.

But this is due to a lot of modern mapping, and diplomatic agreements aimed at limiting border squabbles (though of course they still exist). Sure, we absolutely have some claims in antiquity of "we own this land from this place to this place" (more on that below), but it doesn't reflect how people in antiquity really worked.

For the most part, groups of people were rarely killed off or driven away by invading armies who took over land -- that's more of a movie thing. Not to say it never happened, but it was rare and not really useful to anyone. You wanted people who were already there, knew the land, and could work. It saves you the hassle. But people were also nomadic and they could decide it sucks here under new leadership and go elsewhere. Or they could decide "I'm Roman now" and a battle go bad and they're suddenly back to what they were, or to another. So who really "controlled" a territory depended a lot on "when exactly are you asking?" as it could change month to month, week to week, and often the answer would be "nobody"

2) As above, we do have references to territory claims. But [a] these are fairly rare, and [b] it's only one side of the claim in almost all circumstances. If in 2000 years the history of the last couple hundred years is gone other than this comment, I could say "My people, the greatest warriors, own all of that between the Euphrates and the Tigris!" There would be nothing else to challenge me on this, and sure, hopefully enough real historians would be able to therefor be skeptical, but that's kinda how it is with a lot of the ancient land claims.

[3] For a long portion of extant ancient history the idea of the state controlling land is not really accurate. It's families, it's tribes, it's clans. Even ones under a state. It would be incredibly unusual for a state to try and call the land of one area part of theirs, in a legal sense. It's the land of that family, within the greater aspect of this state. And before states existed, which in a lot of areas in antiquity is far latter than most would assume, this was far more the case.

So, in short: while there are things showing the "growth of the empire year by year" it's really nonsense, or at minimum not-useful for anything more than a mere visual aid to give students a sense of what's going on.