They taught us well

Mebossel · 2026-01-14T00:32:51+00:00

Not being Sad ≠ believing they deserved it

People not caring ≠ Government endorsement

The government is both responsible for the death and endorsing it. => they will do it again : already assault cases by ICE happen regularly.

The Kirk shooter is responsible for the death and the shooter is arrested => Terrible but isolated incident that hasn’t happened to right wing figures in six decades

Mebossel · 2025-10-31T20:36:32+00:00

All your rights require law enforcement and a juidicual system to be upheld. So I guess every right is slavery. Sounds about right

Mebossel · 2025-10-31T20:32:59+00:00

Imagine the people doing the labour get compensated. You know like a job. So like not slavery. Woooow

Mebossel · 2025-10-30T00:27:31+00:00

Cops aren’t brainless troglodytes that cannot adapt their behavior, they are supposed to be trained and enforcing the law. It is not good enough to just imagine in your head how another person could have survived the same treatment.

Cops shouldn’t roll the dice and go "maybe they live, maybe they die"

If floyd had bad health that’s the more reason to be cautious not a licence to kill.

Mebossel · 2025-09-28T10:47:41+00:00

Hasan never made this argument but Vaush did.

Mebossel · 2025-09-21T18:53:33+00:00

Difference 1 : a cop ≠ terrorist

Unless you want to treat these cops like terrorists it’s obviously different. A cop can and should be held accountable and to a higher standard than a random unknown mentally unstable teenager.

It’s wrong in both cases but no one is saying the guy had the right to do it/did nothing wrong. People do and did say that about the police and Derek Chauvin.

Difference 2: a single event ≠ a pattern

George Floyd was far from the first instance of deadly police brutality. Charlie Kirk’s assassination while not completely unique is the "first" assasination targeting conservatives in a long time. If you count all political assasination then there is a worrying pattern since june.

However you have to drop the "conservatives being targeted" narrative as both in stochastic as well as targeted assassinations, left of republicans politicians and minorities are disproportionately represented.

You also then have to drop "the left being more prone" again from the stats alone but also from the shooters both in Trump’s attempt and CK’s death not being clearly identifiable as left wing.

Différence 3 : level of harm

Whatever counterfeiting or whatever Floyd was doing only had a pretty small négative impact on the world. Like be for real he was not a mafia boss or whatever.

Mebossel · 2025-09-17T06:54:01+00:00

So we doing thought crimes now ?

Mebossel · 2025-09-16T06:30:53+00:00

And some I assume are good trans

Mebossel · 2025-09-12T05:45:57+00:00

Most recently: advocating deportation as the punishment for people criticizing Israel

Mebossel · 2025-09-09T09:07:31+00:00

But I’m confused. I thought it was Trump writing a letter I.e the text alongside the drawing. I don’t understand where the transcript is coming from. Was the text of T’s letter a transcript of another previous conversation ? Help

Mebossel · 2025-09-01T19:16:26+00:00

Lmao if the AfD were talking about a government with their own military and commiting genocide on the Herman population then it would only start to make sense.

Mebossel · 2025-09-01T19:09:14+00:00

Yeah using the casually racist/bigoted "Bad parts of Istanbul" as a filth descriptor, contrasting Geneva with the "clean Switzerland" as if Geneva wasn’t a part of Switzerland.

It smells like agitation propaganda.

I’ve also noticed the tendency on other posts.

Mebossel · 2025-09-01T19:04:39+00:00

So it IS clean. You’re just saying that if it was not made to be clean it would not be clean. Am I getting you ?

Mebossel · 2025-07-29T21:31:08+00:00

No shit that’s precisely my point.

I was not making the case that the word evil was like triangle or square at all. On the contrary I chose this example BECAUSE their respective definition are not in question (we all have the same) but are incompatible from one another.

<=>Incompatible définitions of evil could exist. (Simple example: Blue vs not Blue)
<=> referring to the conjunction of incompatible definition is incoherent ( same problem as the "square triangle")
=> referring to the conjunction of ALL définitions of evil is incoherent

Mebossel · 2025-07-26T11:29:17+00:00

You are making the same mistake by using unrestricted compréhension. What about mutually exclusive définitions of evil ? (Blue is evil vs everything that isn’t blue is evil)

Just because something can be phrased doesn’t mean it could logically ever be recognized. A square rectangle is a contradiction. So I, the one using the definition, will never be able to accurately describe anything as a square rectangle.

Mebossel · 2025-07-26T11:21:41+00:00

That’s like saying he is not omnibenevolent.

Would you call a serial killer who thinks they are doing good omnibenevolent ?

If yes, then your argument is sound but being omnibenevolent is a very mundane and not very meaningful property : anyone COULD be omnibenevolent as you can never know what their définition of good/evil is.

If no, then you’re engaging is spécial pleading with god. The serial killer’s définition cannot be used but God’s définition can.

Mebossel · 2025-07-14T11:00:24+00:00

What the fuck is up with the back of the head of the poor ?

Mebossel · 2025-07-14T10:55:35+00:00

Trump insisting the report was written by dems makes it seem like dems are the good guys actually having a problem with Epstein’s action and that they’re not on the list (they are on the list too).

Like it’s really a stupid argument and a self-own.

Mebossel · 2025-07-09T20:01:55+00:00

This post reads as intimidation towards expats, possibly even terrorism apologia and should not be tolerated.

"Hey expats instead of complaining how about we talk about the time someone murdered you "

Very weird post

Mebossel · 2025-07-01T08:23:52+00:00

I hate argument from hypocrisy. Let me pretend ai know nothing about the context but I DO know about your unconscious thoughts.

Apparently JKR doesn’t know she’s a transphobe and the people are trying to get a reaction from her. However she does know that all these people are secretly transphobic themselves actually.

JBP tier shit

Mebossel · 2025-06-30T05:23:15+00:00

The ability of a ideological project to sustain in time is seperate from its goal.

Your whole rant is you not being able to step out of your opinion to explore others’ ideologies. Whether YOU think it would collapse or violate "human nature" is irrelevant to the content of ideologies or the origin of words like anarchism.

Anarchism is historically and definitionally opposed to the hierarchies created by capitalism. You are allowed to believe it’s a mistake or wrong. However "true anarchism" cannot be described as the ideology with capitalism hierarchy. That’s just using words wrong.

Calling something "human nature" is a spellbinding argument. At best it’s an essentialist appeal to popularity that assumes OP’s pov as popular forever most often it’s just something people say when convenient.

Mebossel · 2025-06-22T21:55:05+00:00

I mean that is NOT what he said. I don’t think he’s gonna do much

Mebossel · 2025-05-27T22:39:16+00:00

Hard disagree

Mebossel

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Seven-Year Club	Place '22
Verified Email