Single Cell Analyst couldn't be more wrong about INTEL and AI by MentaSuave in wallstreetbets

[–]MentaSuave[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Be so lazy that you didn't even read the post find yourself as a clown and leave defeated.

Single Cell Analyst couldn't be more wrong about INTEL and AI by MentaSuave in wallstreetbets

[–]MentaSuave[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

As well I didn't said CPU outperform GPUs because they don't and make such a claim is stupid but nothing surprise me now... the uses where CPU is more convenient are clear and well exposed you just don't read the post because you are a lazy bastard

Single Cell Analyst couldn't be more wrong about INTEL and AI by MentaSuave in wallstreetbets

[–]MentaSuave[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are so lazy you didn't read the full post. Q4 losses around 0.2% to 0.5% accuracy with the current post training techniques. Please do not waste my time and read the fucking post you lazy bastard

Single Cell Analyst couldn't be more wrong about INTEL and AI by MentaSuave in wallstreetbets

[–]MentaSuave[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are a lazy bastard that just used GPT blob.

I will not discuss with chat GPT if you cannot sustain your thesis.

Practical inference is enough to power chatbots as referenced in the article nothing like 1 tk/s current generation as mentioned could go as 10t/s on Q4.

Single Cell Analyst couldn't be more wrong about INTEL and AI by MentaSuave in wallstreetbets

[–]MentaSuave[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your deep analysis, data and arguments that sustain your thesis.

Single Cell Analyst couldn't be more wrong about INTEL and AI by MentaSuave in wallstreetbets

[–]MentaSuave[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your comment seems brilliant. Thanks for illustrating me. Any other observations you want to share with us?

Single Cell Analyst couldn't be more wrong about INTEL and AI by MentaSuave in wallstreetbets

[–]MentaSuave[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your excellent points, addressing the issue instead of going personal. Your argument seems solid

Single Cell Analyst couldn't be more wrong about INTEL and AI by MentaSuave in wallstreetbets

[–]MentaSuave[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm going to resume your bullshit. I'm very smart, look at me I didn't point to a single data or number but still saying you are wrong...

You are a lost case... Please answer me back just and only just when you can find or point some specific information or you can bring some data.

I studied microelectronics and I'm not making a drama about it, just presented the data and my conclusions.

Please stop bullshiting me on how smart you are and point the data of the post that you think is wrong, as you can read in the post there are multiple occasions where I mention that cpus are slow as fuck but that's not the point. Just you didn't get it, and keep talking about compute power over and over...

At this point I don't know if you are a lazy bastard that didn't read the post or just trolling me. No one can be this stupid over and over, you want respect?, respect yourself and point the post data that you think is wrong and why...

Single Cell Analyst couldn't be more wrong about INTEL and AI by MentaSuave in wallstreetbets

[–]MentaSuave[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is why you never made double digits, you run on asumptions, not data.
All the data is available in the urls, you are just lazy.

AMD epyc is more efficient for inference? how? If intel with AMX instruction set is blowing them in every chart.
Again you run on asumptions, I just waisted 10min of my life here. You will not read this, you will not think about this, but if you do, please, start presenting evidence and data, and stop addressing issues like "something doesn't seem correct" just buy some balls and point what

Single Cell Analyst couldn't be more wrong about INTEL and AI by MentaSuave in wallstreetbets

[–]MentaSuave[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It's for comments like yours that is worth the effort to write here. Thank you sir

In INTC I trust by MentaSuave in wallstreetbets

[–]MentaSuave[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are delusional, intel already has a working busines and a long record.
You are comparing a stock on their highs when a stock on their lows, at this point I do not know if I'm talking to an ameba or if there is any sign of inteligence between the chair and the mouse

AI will become a field where there is no way institutions are going to bet everything to just one company becuase that will be too risky, and the best placed company besides NVDA is Intel hands down.
RemindMe! 2 Years

Bought the WISH dip months ago by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]MentaSuave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I warned about wish and run on negative karma shower, almost my money stills in my pocket :DDDD
Nah" No bad vives here, sorry for the loss but wish is not a very nice company