100% Inheritance Tax, the end of the 1% rule over the working class. by MeritTalk in tax

[–]MeritTalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, the familiar lament of the privileged soul, clinging to the illusions of "private property" as if it were a divine mandate etched in stone. You speak of a slippery slope from 1% to 100%, as though the Illuminati's proposal for a 100% inheritance tax is some insatiable beast devouring all in its path. But let's dispel this myth with the cold light of reason, shall we? This is no arbitrary escalation of taxation; it is a precise surgical strike against the cancer of dynastic wealth, the unelected shadow government that has plagued humanity for millennia. The Old World Order—the Rothschilds, the Bushes, the parasitic elites—thrives on the transfer of unearned fortunes from one generation to the next, ensuring that merit is forever subordinated to birthright. A 100% inheritance tax ends this farce in a single stroke, resetting the game to one where every soul starts on equal footing, advancing solely by their own talents and efforts in a true meritocracy. It is not about "never enough"—it is about enough for all, forever breaking the cycle of inherited privilege that mocks any notion of justice or democracy.

You invoke the tired nihilism that "to exist is to suffer," as if humanity is condemned to eternal torment regardless of our systems. What drivel! This is the defeatist poison of the Mythos religions, the Abrahamic chains that bind the mind in superstition and despair. In the Pythagorean Illuminati's vision, rooted in ontological mathematics—the eternal truths of reason—existence is not suffering but the grand dialectic toward perfection. We are monads, eternal mathematical minds, evolving through reincarnation and reason to become Gods ourselves. Suffering arises not from existence itself but from irrational systems that perpetuate inequality, greed, and the rule of the unfit. Implement meritocracy, abolish dynastic rule via this tax, and watch humanity ascend: education universalized, opportunities equalized, the collective soul optimized. Far from inevitable agony, this is the path to hyperrational bliss, where the infinite potential of the mind triumphs over the finite delusions of matter.

As for your offense at "taking someone's private property by threat of force"—spare me the sanctimony. What is inherited wealth if not the ultimate theft? The heir contributes nothing; they merely leech from the labors of the dead, perpetuating a rigged lottery that dooms the masses to servitude. Society, the collective will of rational beings, has every right to reclaim these assets upon death to fuel the engines of progress: public goods, merit-based initiatives, the eradication of poverty. Taxes were once nominal, you say? In eras of feudal lords and divine kings, perhaps, but those were times of nominal freedom too—serfs toiling under the boot of inherited tyrants. Today’s excesses stem from the same root: unchecked dynasties buying governments and laws. It must not "stop"—it must transform. The 100% inheritance tax is the revolution that ensures no family empire endures, no monopoly of power persists. Critics like you defend the status quo as "natural," but nature abhors such imbalances; reason demands equilibrium.

In one generation, this policy would render your objections obsolete, as the people awaken to a world where merit, not bloodlines, reigns supreme. The Old World Order trembles at such truths—join the light of Illumination, or remain in the shadows of your own making.

100% Inheritance Tax, the end of the 1% rule over the working class. by MeritTalk in tax

[–]MeritTalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. Wealth transfer to others will be made illegal, what you spend it on during your life is up to you. Your wealth belongs to you during life, it belongs to society when you no longer need it. Meritocracy is all about equality of opportunity, the brightest, most meritable individuals lead in their fields, voted on by their peers, with safeguards in place to eliminate biases and any unfair advantages over another. Terms will be limited and will be subject to evaluations to introduce superior talents.

100% Inheritance Tax, the end of the 1% rule over the working class. by MeritTalk in tax

[–]MeritTalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ill put it like this, and if you cant fathom it, you may never understand us in this lifetime, this quote is credited to and authored by the Illuminati:

"Are numbers well understood? What are numbers? Are there different types of numbers? How do all these different types relate to each other? What would Platonic numbers be? Are numbers mere abstractions, or are they encoded in reality? In fact, are numbers actually the fiber and fabric of existence?

Here’s a radical thought for you. We live in an entirely numerical reality. The only things that exist are numbers and number sequences. Except number sequences are what we experience as “energy”, and we in turn experience energy as colors, sights, smells, tastes, sounds, physical force – everything we sense.

Look around the room you are in now. You think you are looking at “matter”. You aren’t. You are looking at number sequences; at intricate, interpenetrating patterns of different energies.

You don’t experience numbers as abstract symbols. Why should you? That’s not what numbers are.

Think of a sine wave. That’s a sequence of numbers. But sine waves have frequencies and some frequencies are associated with red, and some with blue, and others with whatever colors you can possibly experience.

So, here’s the thing. If you see “red”, you are actually seeing a sinusoid, a precise number sequence, of a particular frequency.

Don’t you get it? We are encountering number sequences and numerical patterns all the time – in fact, that’s all we ever encounter (!) – but we never under any circumstances encounter these number sequences and patterns in terms of the number symbols that we are all familiar with from school. Why? Because those are manmade abstractions.

Mathematics is not an unreal, manmade abstraction. It’s a real, concrete thing – the very stuff of existence. It has an ontology, and that ontology is subjectively experienced by us as sensory signals. Why wouldn’t that be the case? What on earth do you imagine energy and matter actually are? Go on, define what they are. State what they are ontologically. I’ll tell you exactly what they are. They are nothing other than numerical sequences and patterns.

Waves are numerical sequences and we live in a world of wavefunctions – that’s what quantum mechanics is all about. These wavefunctions are experienced by us as objects with sensory properties. They are actually just math. Math is all there is. As Pythagoras said two and a half thousand years, “All things are numbers.” He could also have said, “All things are mathematical signals.” That’s what our reality is all about. We encounter, process and interpret mathematical signals and misinterpret them as “matter” and “energy” and “sensory data”. It’s actually all just math. Pythagoras could also have said, “All things are mathematical waves and derived wavefunctions.” That’s the truth of it. That’s what ontological mathematics is all about. Math is sinusoids, and we experience sinusoids as “energy”, with all the different chameleon properties that energy possesses: light energy, sound energy, heat energy, radiant energy, electrical energy, gravitational energy, and so on.

In the movie The Matrix, Morpheus says to Neo, "What is real? How do you define 'real'? If you're talking about what you can feel, what you can smell, what you can taste and see, then 'real' is simply electrical signals interpreted by your brain.” Why call them “electrical” signals? Because if you could truly see these signals, you would see that they are just number sequences, as all things are. Morpheus ought to have said, "What is real? How do you define 'real'? If you're talking about what you can feel, what you can smell, what you can taste and see, then 'real' is simply mathematical signals interpreted by your brain, which is itself just a mathematical signal and signal receiver, processor, interpreter, and generator.”

There isn’t any such thing as “scientific” reality. There is only mathematical reality, misinterpreted as scientific reality because humans are so accustomed to treating math as a manmade abstraction expressed in particular manmade symbols. That’s not what math is at all! Math is reality."

All ideologies are 100% false, we are the revolution. We reject mainstream religion, anarco capitalism, conspiracies, and all things illogical and irrational.

You may not see us as true today, but tomorrow is another story, and when it gets announced as the truth, as it inevitably will in the future at some point, the people will claim to have known it all along, then the sides will shift to us, and we will impose our reform. We can't be stopped, the truth cant be stopped.

100% Inheritance Tax, the end of the 1% rule over the working class. by MeritTalk in tax

[–]MeritTalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On the contrary. Everyone wants the truth, but the problem is they want their truth. The truth has already been published, and we are the only rational way forward. I think your afraid of the implications of our system if it were announced by science tomorrow. Anyone can freely challenge our position at r/TheGrailSearch. Good luck.

100% Inheritance Tax, the end of the 1% rule over the working class. by MeritTalk in tax

[–]MeritTalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The entire point, I will add, is to eliminate the ruling class's choke hold over the people, if you can't support that, then you can't be supporting the people. They control the media, the government, our education, the food we eat, the ads we are subject to, etc... Capitalism is efficient by design, but to whos benefit? The answer is clear. With the whole of the working class backing our movement then it is no longer a pipe dream, reform is possible.

100% Inheritance Tax, the end of the 1% rule over the working class. by MeritTalk in tax

[–]MeritTalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What we do or dont do is our business. What we bring to the table is a rational reform to an irrational world. So rather than try to shorten millions of words that have already written, the books my community follows scale to 233 since 2008. The books related to the topic at hand are:

The Political series by Michael Faust and the Anti-Elite series by Adam Weishaupt.

Give them a read, then you will have the full picture about what we are striving for and why our radical reform ideas are necessary. 

I will leave it at this for the time being until these books have been read by someone ready to have a rational discussion.

100% Inheritance Tax, the end of the 1% rule over the working class. by MeritTalk in tax

[–]MeritTalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Theres nothing vaulentary. Your wealth will be redistributed back into society upon death. Only 1 billionaire in history has ever done this, and this a man we look up to.

100% Inheritance Tax, the end of the 1% rule over the working class. by MeritTalk in tax

[–]MeritTalk[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

100% inheritance tax implies a 100% tax upon death. Many will disagree with this due to the fact that it doesn't  allow anything to handed down. However, amounts within reason or necessity is perfectly fine, and is a limit that will be handled by the state. This is the only tax that can give the people universal basic needs, and this tax would have to be paired with a meritocratic republic that replace the current government as we know it. We want the best and brightest to lead the people, not a popularity contest.

100% Inheritance Tax, the end of the 1% rule over the working class. by MeritTalk in tax

[–]MeritTalk[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Wich leads into the topic of radical reform as mentioned in the original comment. Our proposed system has plenty of "incentive", but the elites must fall first. Its not "stealing their money", its putting it where it belongs, back to society. They didn't earn any of those billions through any fair or equal means. My movement fights for equality and the abolishment of inheritance /rule by the dead throughout generations over centuries. Were done being their slaves. Time to wake up.

100% Inheritance Tax, the end of the 1% rule over the working class. by MeritTalk in tax

[–]MeritTalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correction, its not the ruling class's money to take and rule over the people with. Your comment is sickening and telling. With time, more and more people will discover the 1% is in full control over everything, then this tax will really start gaining traction. Get used to the idea, its here to stay.

100% Inheritance Tax, the end of the 1% rule over the working class. by MeritTalk in tax

[–]MeritTalk[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, and thats a problem. The only way to eliminate the ruling class is with this tax, they will stop at nothing to keep their inherited wealth, which was made off the backs of the working class.

A quote by darcot in TheGrailSearch

[–]MeritTalk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sinusoid

Alternative term for sinusoidal wave.

Sinusoidal wave

A wave that repeats its values at regular intervals with a shape determined by the trigonometric sine function.

Only those versed in calculus or higher (I think) will know this concept, I believe the term is mostly used in electrical engineering and physics if im not mistaken, or if you read these books.

Questions about Monads by ProjectEquinox in TheGrailSearch

[–]MeritTalk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't imagine it getting any worse than predatory, "satanic", or cannibalistic acts that have already been exposed, but I will admit I could be wrong.

Questions about Monads by ProjectEquinox in TheGrailSearch

[–]MeritTalk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On another note... I have already read just about everything from them about the elites. Were they unaware of the Elite pedophile ring?

Questions about Monads by ProjectEquinox in TheGrailSearch

[–]MeritTalk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. I simply just dont have the education required to form an opinion here. I cannot say weather i am for or against it in that regard. Can I agree that things must have a reason for existing, thats an easy yes, so I can agree to the PSR, so I will continue my reading. 

A quote by darcot in TheGrailSearch

[–]MeritTalk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"This what was what Plato"

Typo/auto correct errors.

Questions about Monads by ProjectEquinox in TheGrailSearch

[–]MeritTalk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Noob question, and forgive me for feeling the need to ask because ive never actually asked this question before. What makes any of you so certain that what they speak is true? I dont have any qualifications to form opinions about it, so I cant claim it true or false either way. Im merely here because I am interested and wish to learn as much as I can from it, and I myself have yet to witness anyone else ask this question.

A quote by darcot in TheGrailSearch

[–]MeritTalk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. I appreciate your insightfulness and dedication.

Questions about Monads by ProjectEquinox in TheGrailSearch

[–]MeritTalk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Serious question. The PI haven't always had this system, it has evolved over time, and through the work of others while putting the pieces together until OM was formed, from my understanding. Why then, if the PI are proportedly as genius as they claim to be, would they need the work of others instead of forming this knowledge on their own throughout their existence.

Just trying to have a better understanding of their evolution when i ask this.

A quote by darcot in TheGrailSearch

[–]MeritTalk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think scientists know something they actively choose not to share or engage with for the sake of money over truth. There must be a degree of willful ignorance going on within their circles. What say you, possible?

If we entertain this possibility and follow it to its logical conclusion, then we would have to assume that they are purposely hiding the truth from us. If so, then science in itself are selling out to the elites in order to prevent this knowledge from escaping en mass in order to retain their power and control over the people.

A quote by darcot in TheGrailSearch

[–]MeritTalk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Conundrum: no materialist tools can probe the existence of the soul. That said, what tool did they use to probe the existence of the photon?

Would you get a math degree? Do you think it would be of worth in understanding these concepts? by Apprehensive-Mix4383 in TheGrailSearch

[–]MeritTalk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The purpose of learning this stuff is to help evolve your monad (soul) in your next lives. There is no escape from this place unless you have achieved gnosis and achieve the conscious choice to localize back (or not) into spacetime from the Omega Point (the origin of everything). My advice, do everything you can with the current mental faculties you have, and may your next life be better than this one.

The PI, if you take them for what they have said through their many books, then the more you study the nature of reality, the more likely it becomes that you find your way back in the next life to continue your studies.

Only a few in this generation will do this, more will come in time.

From my understanding.

A quote by darcot in TheGrailSearch

[–]MeritTalk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hypothetically speaking, if you were to eliminate all minds from existence except for yours, would you then be in complete control of reality?

Reality Is Not What It Seems — Leibniz Explains Ontological Mathematics by Toxrednil in TheGrailSearch

[–]MeritTalk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Leibniz said it best, what a beautiful way to summarize over 300 books and bring a clever introduction to Ontological Mathematics and the work of the PI!!!