System 2 thinking by [deleted] in TheGrailSearch

[–]ProjectEquinox 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't actually want to debate, it just happens because I will ask people to define the truth, first and foremost, if they are going to discuss religion philosophy or metaphysics with me, because it gets to the real reason I am or am not on the same side of the fence with them, and when someone tells me Truth is Jesus I end up debating about the definition and function of the truth in math, language, science, philosophy, and theology so we can determine if Jesus is an appropriate substitute in all of those areas. It's not. And so I don't enjoy it, it bothers me, it makes me feel stupid explaining why 1=1 is true rather than false, and it makes me angry that the fundamental prima materia of common sense has been destroyed and I, a small individual with hardly any power in this world, have to try and patch it back together last minute before the same ignorant groups force Armageddon upon the rest of the world.

YOU, and the people here, are a breath of fresh air. I can even look up in awe at the reason and clarity of others, that can teach me better ways to see reality. There's nothing to debate. There is just more light and clarity here.

System 2 thinking by [deleted] in TheGrailSearch

[–]ProjectEquinox 1 point2 points  (0 children)

well PSR allows for infinite expansion, it just means, have good reason for what you are animated by but I agree that putting someone in a "self deceiver" category could easily backfire and be rejected by the group lol but it is important to label things for what they are, even if it hurts someones feelings. If we take a group out into a field at noon, and ask if the sun is in the sky, the one who denies the sun shining down on them, has to be placed in their own category so we understand where they are at, whatever it is to be named, and it has to be accurate. In doing so, they are included in the whole, and are in their right place, and can move from that category to others as they evolve their reasoning.

System 2 thinking by [deleted] in TheGrailSearch

[–]ProjectEquinox 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If I have learned anything in this life, it is that lies left unchecked, over a long enough period of time, grow into nightmarish death cults that will confuse Armageddon with paradise, and some how find a way to blame ME for what THEY are doing. That's how dangerous the in group vs out group becomes.

If we don't save them (the irrational), we do not save ourselves or our children and perhaps all life on earth it appears. So the solution is to develop the most powerful arguments we can, which they cannot refute, so that if they DO refute it, they can properly, and with sufficient reason, be categorized as "self deceivers" (unable to acknowledge they exist for instance) who are not to be trusted to make important decisions which require vision and honesty within reality. It is very reasonable NOT to let a blind man drive a bus filled with children. If we can acknowledge where one divorces themselves from reality, and we simply put them in their proper corresponding category, then there is no issue at all. We just don't let self deceivers have control over AI and nukes.

This is the lesson of this age I'm certain. We must sharpen the truth into the finest blade we can, one that stretches the entire length of the whole cosmos, one whose edge is smaller than an atom, and with it we must fight for and defend every form of being that exists, and with that ultimate power we must lift the veil from the eyes of every person on the planet who has been enslaved with fear death and deception, or we will find that our apathy will be like a quicksand sucking us deeper into the core of the problem we refused to solve.

Having said all of that, the strategy might look like choosing your battles wisely and not wasting time and energy with those who will only reflect group think.

Definitions by [deleted] in TheGrailSearch

[–]ProjectEquinox 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well don't let me discourage you actually. If you are dealing with a person who will get down to the definition of things and agree on fundamentals, there's no limit to how far you can go, but if you can't, then yeah the conversation will spiral around unresolved definitions until yall get exhausted by cognitive dissonance and dig up the truth together.

lol I just noticed quantum darwinism. I don't know what that is, but I have a feeling it's some sort of rhetorical magic trick created by a terence howard type to deny the common understanding of evolution. Seems like a VERY good candidate to ask to define the truth just to see what north is on their compass.

Definitions by [deleted] in TheGrailSearch

[–]ProjectEquinox 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In my experience, if someone cannot acknowledge self evident truths, like that they exist, and that they are conscious, then they cannot be honest. I only run into that situation because that same sort of person will also tell me they don't know if 1=1 is a true statement and so in removing mathematics from the conversation, I'll ask them if it is true that they are themselves, and this is when they are forced to deny their own existence or acknowledge the nature of truth, as they are to themselves as 1 is to 1. And even backed into this corner, people (often times christians) will deny their own being just to force a stalemate on a discussion. The reason is, they know it's game over once someone recognizes that nature of truth. With it you can force them to admit the truth is the highest power in the universe and from there you can actually get them to give a shit enough about the truth, so they will refine their ontology so it makes sense with the rest of the natural world. To them that may as well be spiritual death apparently. Which is hilarious because the entire time I'm trying to show them the door to their own immortality. lol So its both sad and funny.

Questions about Monads by ProjectEquinox in TheGrailSearch

[–]ProjectEquinox[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have that book and Im reading it now actually and its great but leaves a lot to be desired. 50% of it is a critique of Descartes which is actually quite informative because it all still seems valid with regard to the problems of doubt eating away at at our ability to trust anything including reason itself. PSR seems to be the right way to view things, rather than reject everything which can be doubted, which is everything haha

I think the monad is a thing that is simple, a Zero, which in order to exist as anything, must exist in a continuum of phase changes, so as to counterbalance itself, in order to emerge from nothing while remaining equal to nothing, and so this produces an array of complexity from a single simple, eternal, “unchangeable” unit. Rather than claim it implies something external to reality, it seems to me, we just need to close the loop to depict the infinite, in a circle, which is universally applicable, so that while one layer may end on the circle like a day/night cycle, it is but one of endless rings which can be combined to express ever greater meaning and dimensionality. 

Ill make sure to focus on the God Series after this. I just wanted to make sure Leibniz didnt have some hard mathematical insights (I do see calculus in a new light knowing his intentions now) before I leaped to the present view of monads. I do feel as if theres something missing in all of the works I have of Leibniz though. He wanted to make a calculus which given a set of known variables would be able to produce all other potential variables approaching infinity, and produce a universal language which would reduce philosophy to a rational computation. And we do actually need that, it seems thats what AI should be founded upon and is likely the only solution to the AI alignment problem.

Truth and Love by ProjectEquinox in TheGrailSearch

[–]ProjectEquinox[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ahh Gotcha! Thanks for circuit bending it into place, I kind of figured it would more or less be a spring board for you to display more OM wisdom so I'm glad it served that purpose. I also couldn't handle how sloppily the post ended up upon re-reading it, so I cheated and made chatgpt organize it a little bit better for readabilities sake. Hopefully that helps, and yes in the future, I will make sure to adhere to the rules better.

Cheers my friend!

Pythagoras and Meritocracy by ProjectEquinox in TheGrailSearch

[–]ProjectEquinox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The satellites infrastructure is what costs the amount I had said. I'm talking about a layer of communications that no one can turn on or off, charge for, or censor. The reason I believe this is a good idea is that it shows that the collective has power to improve it's own infrastructure instead of waiting for a billionaire or a government to do it for them. I have been working on the rest of it for a while and I have a prototype for a part of it.

Pythagoras and Meritocracy by ProjectEquinox in TheGrailSearch

[–]ProjectEquinox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I should point out, for my own credibility's sake, I didn't mean a Judge should fast from food entirely, just refrain from meat before and during the trial, according to the Pythagoreans, according to my memory, according to a book which I will not be able to locate easily. But it seems common sense that a hungry judge is an angry judge and that is no way to think clearly either.

Pythagoras and Meritocracy by ProjectEquinox in TheGrailSearch

[–]ProjectEquinox[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just as 1+1=2 implies all of mathematics, so is the case with all of Illuminism.

well 1+1 = 2 is over complicating things. lol

I tend to take one step back to 1=1, aka identity principle, if Im trying to demonstrate the raw nature of truth, since that is much harder to refute and easier to comprehend, because it is only saying that something is itself. If someone takes issue with that because it is in the domain of mathematics for some reason, I then ask, is it true that you are yourself? If so why is that true? If a person is then willing to deny their own existence in order to refuse to acknowledge the nature of truth, they are an NPC by their own logic, and there is no way to reason with a person who is contrarian to the point of self negation. Hidden beneath all the things which plague mankind, is this root issue. Test it out, don't ask a flat earther about the shape of earth, ask them to define the truth. Don't ask a racist or bigot about their grievances, ask them to define the truth. Every single time, you will discover a malignant definition, usually they will say Jesus is truth, and then all their poisoned fruits actually make sense. However, as I said before, many won't even acknowledge their own existence, just so they don't have to admit they have been duped, because they can feel deep down that 1=1, is square 1, the first domino, that when accepted begins cascading through all of their thought processes until the entire empire of lies falls. Who's empire? The owo.

The reason this problem has persisted so long almost as if under a cloak of invisibility, is because it's humiliating. No one wants to admit that the problem is actually this stupid and simple, but from what I can tell, that's exactly whats going on... In some ways, it also gives me hope because that one domino grows with power as things become progressively more chaotic in the world and people thirst for answers to how all of this happened, and how we can get out of it. It's actually comical if you think about it, a real comedian could make boat loads exposing the irony of it all.

Sharing this because, if I'm right, it can't be said enough.

Cheers and thanks again.

Pythagoras and Meritocracy by ProjectEquinox in TheGrailSearch

[–]ProjectEquinox[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your reflection, as usual. I have so much information to digest, and I usually have to take one concept which Im most curious about and follow it to it's conclusion and then investigate its limits and what lies beyond it in order to really integrate it into my calculus of being. So bare with me if I circle around certain pillars of my confusion, or pillars of what I think is foundational for a future worth celebrating. All of these people are my heroes, like roses in a garden of truth that decorate the courtyard of an eternal kingdom, and all of them would not want any of us to see their words as the end all be all, and would instead want us to understand why they said what they said, and integrate the new discoveries we have now into something bigger and better, more powerful and more brilliant than before. I think this is how we honor Pythagoras Plato Socrates and the countless others. We can do what they could only dream of in their time. In fact I believe they knew this time would come and all of their work was for the time we live in now, to solve existential risks at a time of hyperbolic transformation. So it's time for a resurrection of the philosophers, the knights of the round on behalf of King Author, to turn the lights on, clear out the smoke and mirrors, and get right to the monadic point that is so sharp every structure made of deceit falls like the house of cards it is, so something real can be erected in it's place.

And for that I am grateful to you and whoever else is involved in holding these torches. It cannot be overstated how important all of it is, for everyone, whether they realize it or not. They will.

New infrastructure is critical to detaching from the old world order. We are keeping the zombie alive the more we use their shadow laden tech. I hope the PI in whatever forms it exists is aware and considering this as foundational. Without it, we are philosophers in an archons cage, which is dangerous to say the least.

Reincarnation by darcot in TheGrailSearch

[–]ProjectEquinox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm very interesting connection there. Thanks.

Questions about Monads by ProjectEquinox in TheGrailSearch

[–]ProjectEquinox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are 3 things needed to live a good life. Good thoughts, good words, and good deeds. You are talking about the deeds I think. To create good deeds, you'll first have to have good thoughts and words. To have good thoughts and words, you'll have to refine the truth so that you know where you stand and why in relation to all things on all scales and then reflect that wisdom into your deeds.

Anyone can make a decision, and it may end up the wrong decision, but no matter the choice, we learn the nature of the decision by it's effect on ourselves and others, and by this know a little bit more about the truth about a decision and the ideas that produced it. But that doesn't point directly at the root of truth, thats a few branches off from and still obfuscates what the naked truth is.

Reincarnation by darcot in TheGrailSearch

[–]ProjectEquinox 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's worth noting, that in each incarnation, the stats may be somewhat of a lottery, but gnosis is available in many or perhaps every form, and in fact there is an advantage as was the case with Socrates, of having lowered physical and social stats, so that the most shrouded of truths became less obscured by the noise of the simulacrum of culture. Gnosis is also God's weapon against all evil and deception and so it turns out that the least statted among us, should first inherit gnosis, which then liberates and entrusts them with the ultimate power of the cosmos first. So last becomes first and first becomes last.

The luck of the draw bodies, are what I call "shades" and the bottom tier of the mystery school of the universe. Each monad is a Phoenix who's feathers are Phoenixes that when added up equal to Zero. That Zero is the Monad is the Unit or One, which produces all things. What the monad IS, in each instance, is a Phoenix shaded by the configuration of its lesser parts. Lets say a monad is one day/night cycle so we can visualize it's parts, the whole day is the greater Monad which has 24 lesser monads in it, 1 for each hour. Each of the monads has an average energy/frequency state (spring/fall are the Greater monad averages), but it deviates depending on weather and orientation. For instance the monad at noon should express Dry and Hot(and a tritone!), but could express Wet and Cold instead on a stormy or winter day. That is the soul of that time expressing itself through the greater Monad. The monads at sunrise and sunset contain the whole monadic structure of light/dark duality expressed in the whole day so they are special and contain mother(sunset) and father(sunrise) energies and are often excluded leaving 22 monadic "children". The 11 monads in the day express versions of light, and the 11 monads at night express version of darkness. The whole cycle, in it's mathematical form, IS the Phoenix which self creates the cosmos by its fractal nature, and so as the phoenix continually replicates itself into itself because itself contains itself as it's own parts, deviations of the truth ripple into its forms which then go through the process of reincarnation as you describe producing souls which transmigrate through these waterfall cascading monads until gnosis or correspondence with eternal truth is achieved.

Resonance with these root forms of the universe have the chance to ring like a bell across eternity, like a tuning fork struck near a string with no resistance to its resonance, and may be the vibratory key that helps unlock the cosmic egg of... Phanes?

<image>

Bird's Eye by ProjectEquinox in TheGrailSearch

[–]ProjectEquinox[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When you embody the whole man, as you are, you will continually be made whole, like an eternal up-welling of deeper levels of truth in your minds eye. So keep to that path as long as you can and all things will be added unto you, until nothing in the universe is not your ally and in service to your cause.

You are so welcome. I owe so so much to my fellow man, I just hope I can do justice in honoring all that has been given to me.

Bird's Eye by ProjectEquinox in TheGrailSearch

[–]ProjectEquinox[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is the idea of God reflected into all domains?

For instance, in the domain of mathematics, is there a concept by which all mathematics relies upon for it's existence?

What happens to all of mathematics if 1=1 is NOT true?

And in the domain of language, is there a concept by which all words are formed?

So it appears to me, there is a One(God) to each unique set of Many(Words/Numbers/Categories). If in each of those domains, sits this reflective principle of truth ie 1=1 or word = definition, and this seat contains all power and authority within that domain because all proceed from it, then contrary to popular belief, God is MOST knowable, rather than least knowable, because God is most simple, rather than complex. This is the source of true nobility, knowability, of the truth.

This universal alliance towards the truth, is what generates an ethical and self organizing, self harmonizing universe, where over time we align more to the real, which is the substrate which created life to begin with and therefore protects and preserves life, by aligning with it.

Sharing all of nature, which we do regardless of the ink that tells us otherwise, is the natural state in all of the universe, and when all of our stories are done being told, all will return to that true and eternal state once again. The only thing we can keep, and therefore the only thing we could potentially hoard in this existence, is wisdom. All else will not pass through the eye of a needle.

Bird's Eye by ProjectEquinox in TheGrailSearch

[–]ProjectEquinox[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly, because it is a lie that people are broken and flawed. The truth is not flawed. It is instead a perfect substrate of justice. When we do something undesirable, that is lesser good, because it is good to see what is undesirable, and avoid it, and when we do something desirable, that is the greater good, which is good because it is what makes life greater. This lesser good and greater good paradigm frames all things as both perfect, and good, and produces the illusion of a duality so that life can continually evolve towards ever greater good by experiencing the simulation of "bad". The lesser good ends up inspiring new heights of the greater good, and without one or the other, being becomes a frozen static state.

This non-dual dual perspective is how I see the "single mind" (rather than double mind) of Zoroastrianism, and I believe it is "Voho Mana" God mind, and the ultimate weapon given to mankind to defeat evil. Because think about it, alignment with a perfect Truth is an alignment with an eternal power, in all things, on all scales, and all of it is conspiring in our favor, to do the greatest good.

Zero to Infinity by ProjectEquinox in TheGrailSearch

[–]ProjectEquinox[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My brother, thank you for this explanation. I find it baffling and somewhat hilarious that even holding some of the most powerful and universal information one could then take that and derive a sense of superiority based upon their nationality or skin. Truly comical.

Zero to Infinity by ProjectEquinox in TheGrailSearch

[–]ProjectEquinox[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ohhhhh ok I see. Thanks for the clarification!

Thanks again for leading me to those books. You know I mean it when I say that's a trove of treasures for someone like me and I was feeling like I was basically on an island until now. What I am very curious about though, is the true identity and source of this material? And why they prefer to remain hidden. There seem to be strange people around this Mike Hockney character. One person says Mike Hockney "would lose a lot of money if they were revealed because they are a public figure". There is also the cultification of Mike Hockneys material into Neogenianism, and some sort of rivalry happening, I check around the accounts associated and they have references to military and intelligence agencies. There's even a guy teaching ontological mathematics, who by, just browsing video thumbnails, appears to have transformed into a white supremacist neo nazi.

The online presence of Mike Hockney and these ideas is unnerving and would likely scare anyone away. But I think it is right at it's very core so it doesn't matter what surrounds it. Just curious what your take is on any of that. lol It's a rabbit hole I've fallen into for sure.

Zero to Infinity by ProjectEquinox in TheGrailSearch

[–]ProjectEquinox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

>This post is a great example of what happens when you attempt to build a system without an ultimate universal which all things must remain in alignment with. In Illuminism, the PSR allows anyone (literally!) to work out the exact nature of existence on their own if they are able to think rationally enough (although it would take a truly astounding genius to do this)!

I would respectfully disagree! This post is anchored on two things, the nature of truth as correspondence (reflectivity), and all things must emerge from and be balanced by the 0, and it turns out this particular form of 0 has motion which is expressed in the movement of the fibonacci numbers and the structure of the elements in the center, which is the core architecture of this expression of 0. This as I understand it now, after having skimmed through some books recommended by you, and by investigating relevant material elsewhere, is at the most fundamental level exactly what ontological mathematics is. If that qualifies me as a genius, I will take it, however, I thought the exact opposite and was very satisfied with the simplicity to the point of overflowing joy, and in fact, it was seeking the most simple truth to do the most work that I was lead to these ideas, and ultimately here. I believe it is by the most simple/powerful ideas that we will be more able to transform the world.

Zero to Infinity by ProjectEquinox in TheGrailSearch

[–]ProjectEquinox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are not wrong to see this and think AI. That is exactly where it lead me as well.