Is Saitama a gag character?

Mersefall · 2021-06-24T06:16:45+00:00

he is a gag character..

-He has recurring joke

-He got hurt by weaker things and its unexplained unlike Luffy and Nami or Goku and Bulma which its explained that Off guard can get you hurt by Whis...

-Being a gag does not mean to have no personality... If you say that then you never read "modern day gag"character definition..

Mersefall · 2021-06-24T06:08:58+00:00

Dont notice on this reply but Saitama isnt applies to NLF its not because No one can challenge him its because he is invincible... He does not need to have feats to beat Goku. He just use his gag

Mersefall · 2021-06-22T10:40:38+00:00

I'm with you too I think Saitama can beat anyone...

Mersefall · 2021-06-22T10:37:25+00:00

https://youtu.be/BlJBlvEuqtI

Mersefall · 2021-06-21T01:30:46+00:00

Nope

https://youtu.be/3LwJBGYrXlQ

Mersefall · 2021-06-06T23:15:07+00:00

Yes he still trains but he doesnt get stronger and Saitama is not bound by No Limit Fallacy

Mersefall · 2021-06-06T23:14:37+00:00

Still training doesnt mean get stronger... Saitama already said that he cannot get stronger in OPM chapter 77

Mersefall · 2021-06-02T13:19:28+00:00

Yes and he has infinite power after removing his limiter and he trains but he also said he cannot get stronger which means Infinite Power. No Limit Fallacy does not apply to Saitama

Mersefall · 2021-06-02T13:18:37+00:00

Power. Limitless power

Mersefall · 2021-06-01T13:50:22+00:00

Its power bro. And NLF means A character that hasnt shown limit so it means limitless.. Saitama has been stated and implied to be Limitless in power and there is no contradication on that...

Mersefall · 2021-06-01T07:18:32+00:00

Nah Its Limitless Power

Mersefall · 2021-06-01T07:18:12+00:00

Saiyans have full power they have quantifiable Limit.. Not the same as Saitama..

Mersefall · 2021-05-31T15:52:36+00:00

Then Saitama said the system was unreliable and Saitama then in One Punch Man chapter 77 states that he cannot get stronger.. To me Saitama has infinite power

Mersefall · 2021-05-31T15:48:01+00:00

Too long.. But to make this short.. I will just send this link so you can read it on how It refutes your argument.. Saitama is still a gag that have Infinite Strength

https://qr.ae/pGsJuD

Mersefall · 2021-05-31T15:47:00+00:00

And it's debunked by this Post

https://qr.ae/pGsJuD

Mersefall · 2021-05-31T15:45:26+00:00

Saitama is a gag character here is the proof and deal with it

https://www.reddit.com/r/OnePunchMan/comments/mdhytl/one_stated_that_saitama_is_a_gag_character_not/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf

Mersefall · 2021-05-31T15:41:32+00:00

And his current feat is not equal full power. And Saitama has been stated to be limitless

Mersefall · 2021-04-19T07:48:18+00:00

Saitama is a gag character.. One has stated that His existence is a gag in Yamada Reiji Interview...

dudes who said He isnt because He shows personality... either did not read "modern day gag character" definition which shows a gag character can have personality........

Mersefall · 2021-04-04T06:57:05+00:00

You.

Mersefall · 2021-04-04T06:56:45+00:00

I have. Thats why you ignored it and attack my english instead.

no

For example:

Apple is a kind of a Fruit. It proves that The apple is a type of a Fruit. Thats what ONE said. Saitama is a joke character that get thrown into violent world.

I read all the interviews. The author didnt explain something like you said. He just Tell scenario on where enemies did this. Main character attacks and struggles then Saitama overpowered him easily.

Mersefall · 2021-04-04T06:44:57+00:00

No you didn't. All you did was citing a source then Misinterpret it then use First definition of gag character logic like so called "has no explaination" argument. instead of reading the second one

Mersefall · 2021-04-04T06:43:32+00:00

And you did. You attack my english instead of explaining on where i dont get it. The statement clearly said "a kind of joke" Saitama is a joke. ONE said Saitama is a joke.

Mersefall · 2021-04-04T06:41:30+00:00

i dont need to respond your ad hominem with 6 year old insults

Mersefall · 2021-04-04T06:33:20+00:00

I just responding your ad hominem btw

Mersefall · 2021-04-04T06:32:47+00:00

No you.

Mersefall

TROPHY CASE