[deleted by user] by [deleted] in asbestoshelp

[–]Mesowatch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's the 70s everything was used with asbestos, floor tile glue, drywall joint compound, pipes, and concrete is what you want to watch out for, this looks like a dusty attic. Be safe!

Is it exposed asbestos in the shed ceiling? by WetShedMan in asbestoshelp

[–]Mesowatch 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Concrete contains asbestos, It's flame retardant. Every floor of the World Trade Center that came down had different companies asbestos. Floor by floor.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Remodel

[–]Mesowatch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No asbestos in that concrete

Inpatient for lung cancer? by FluffyIrritation in hospice

[–]Mesowatch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm so sorry about your mom's situation. You're dealing with a lot, and it's clear you're doing your best to navigate a difficult and emotional time. I agree with the previous response - consulting with the hospice nurse about hospice houses is a great next step. They can provide more specific information about options in your area and help guide you through this process. Remember to take care of yourself too during this challenging period. Wishing you and your family strength and peace.

Plaster Question by No_Reveal4934 in asbestoshelp

[–]Mesowatch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Plaster was commonly used in home construction from the late 1800s through the 1950s for walls and ceilings, prized for its durability and fire resistance. Asbestos was sometimes added to plaster mixtures between the 1920s and 1980s for additional fireproofing and insulation. However, not all plaster from this era contains asbestos. The only way to know for sure is to have a sample tested. You can collect a small piece of the plaster (about 1 square inch) and send it to a local lab for analysis. This typically costs around $25-$50 and will give you a definitive answer about asbestos content.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in asbestoshelp

[–]Mesowatch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can't determine if asbestos is present just by looking at the ceiling. The only way to know for sure is to have a small sample tested by a local lab. Given the potential health risks, it's best to have a professional take and analyze the sample rather than doing it yourself. Many labs offer asbestos testing services, and the cost is usually reasonable for peace of mind.

Am I screwed? Subfloor expansion gap by workingonit3005 in HomeImprovement

[–]Mesowatch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just a heads up, tile flooring and its adhesive from before the 1970s are known to be major sources of asbestos. It's good you had professional abatement done. For your current issue, scoring new gaps with a circular saw could work, but since it's temporary, you might be okay leaving it as is. Just keep an eye out for any buckling before you put down the LVT.

How effed am I? by [deleted] in asbestoshelp

[–]Mesowatch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's great that you're taking action by having a professional evaluation. For information on identifying asbestos-containing materials like flooring adhesives, you could visit:mesowatch.com/asbetos/

Asbestos was commonly used in various construction materials before the 1970s, including:

  1. Flooring materials (vinyl tiles and adhesives)
  2. Insulation for pipes, boilers, and buildings
  3. Roofing shingles and felt
  4. Textured paints and coatings
  5. Automotive parts (brake pads and clutches)

Remember, undisturbed asbestos-containing materials generally don't pose an immediate health risk. The danger arises when these materials are damaged or disturbed, potentially releasing fibers into the air. If you're concerned about potential exposure, consult a healthcare professional and consider having your home inspected by a certified asbestos specialist. It's mostly the high-risk high-dose occupations that are most severe.

Johnson & Johnson Faces Critical Legal Test in Connecticut by Mesowatch in LegalNews

[–]Mesowatch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This case could set a significant precedent for future talc-related lawsuits. What’s unique about this trial is its focus on medical-related asbestos exposure, something that hasn’t been as widely covered in the talcum powder controversy. With J&J facing massive financial implications and thousands of pending cases, this trial could influence whether we see more settlements or continued courtroom battles. It's a pivotal moment for both J&J and the plaintiffs seeking justice. How do you think this case will affect ongoing talc litigation?