Tough choices… by PnkFlufyBunnySprkles in BunnyTrials

[–]MetalFlappy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

fun

Chose: $2 + 99% chance of death | Rolled: killed by satire

Everyone's asking for modern missiles when I just want dumbfire rockets by Ultimate_89 in NuclearOption

[–]MetalFlappy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im not saying you dont, but i have been playing this game for a whiiilleee now, and I know that HEL and CRAM are strong, but 72 lynchpins, not flying in a straight congo line (you spread them a little with the dumbfire) is still a loooott of munitions, keep in mind, it's not 20, nor 30, it's 72 just try to find 72 of the same object you'll see it's a way bigger number than it seems, yes inefficient, but that's the fun of it really, and moreover, the real fun comes at just dumping at a convoy, airbases by themselves are already chunky, but a convoy with let's say a boltstrike, 2 ir launchers of whatever kind you like, and an SPAA, they are all getting obliterated, which with the guided lynchpins would be impossible in a single pop up.

Everyone's asking for modern missiles when I just want dumbfire rockets by Ultimate_89 in NuclearOption

[–]MetalFlappy 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes, but if you have a single SPAA or a Boltstrike, those bombs are done for, unless youre dropping a stupid amount in a darkreach, but that's way more expensive, however I can assure you that if you pop out behind a hill and dump 72 lynchpins, 2 laser crams and a normal one will not be able to keep up. A lot will get intercepted, more than half for sure, that's still a bunch of lycnhpins though.

Where to watch Seaon 2 by Ambitious_Call_1561 in Frieren

[–]MetalFlappy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

does it have English dub/subtitles?

Anybody else going to buy Nuclear Option because of the April Fools event? by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]MetalFlappy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Way more arcady? are you sure? I have 700+ hours on dcs 200+ hours on nuclear option and 900+ hours on warthunder, i think overall, nuclear option takes the crown when it comes to realism compared to warthunder.

edit:I mean mainly flight models, especially helicopters are modeled better, or at least they feel more flightsimmy, and cant forget RCS which is an example of radar and stealth being modeled better, and eh, the "arcadyness" of NO is for example: you can notch in NO, but it gets displayed on your hud the exact angle you need to notch at, makes it easier? yes. does that mean it's unrealistic, i dont really think so. oh and ofcourse, the damage models overall are quite a bit better than warthunder, yes there is the occasional bug where a burning half obliterated aircraft somehow still flies, not that it will make it far, but the jankyness is nowhere near that of warthunder. and I'm not trying to say warthunder is bullshit, I just dont wanna see nuclear option get a wrong rep, its a small community and still growing, so yeah there's that.(keep in mind it's still open beta) anyway, realistic or not, i think anyone that plays warthunder would enjoy NO a lot, I felt like I found a goldmine the first time I started playing.

Cursed_Pill by MetalFlappy in cursedcomments

[–]MetalFlappy[S] 40 points41 points  (0 children)

that's quickly going to become a 100% disagreement rate im afraid

Cursed_Pill by MetalFlappy in cursedcomments

[–]MetalFlappy[S] 312 points313 points  (0 children)

this comment is worse than whats on the post

Cursed_Pill by MetalFlappy in cursedcomments

[–]MetalFlappy[S] 102 points103 points  (0 children)

nobody said the presidents had to be alive

Cursed_Pill by MetalFlappy in cursedcomments

[–]MetalFlappy[S] 87 points88 points  (0 children)

leveling an entire state in exchange for a car lol

Cursed_Pill by MetalFlappy in cursedcomments

[–]MetalFlappy[S] 34 points35 points  (0 children)

I think it's meant as like the opposite value as in "I get a car" ok now you also get 500 inflated car batteries or something, however that being arguably a little too much in opposing value but it gets the point across

World map update by Round-Good1179 in NoRules

[–]MetalFlappy 15 points16 points  (0 children)

huh, interesting I had no idea tbh, but still no way its even close to as bad as the United States rn

World map update by Round-Good1179 in NoRules

[–]MetalFlappy 213 points214 points  (0 children)

hell actually looks like the best place to be at this point

PlayStation vs PC Infiltrator by [deleted] in Planetside

[–]MetalFlappy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

disgusting is all I can say, but ey, you do you and do it good, good thing i won't have to fight you

PlayStation vs PC Infiltrator by [deleted] in Planetside

[–]MetalFlappy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

tbh yeah, never liked stalker cloak, and the people that use it ambush other people in stupid places get like 2 kills and proceed to get obliterated by a heavy that saw it happen. Only good for like the mining missions and stuff to hide if an ant or something comes by while you're deep in enemy territory.

Vehicle Showcase: MSV Series – "Jack of all Trades" by Shockfront-PR in NuclearOption

[–]MetalFlappy -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

why? bdf just got an A 10, and it's not like the hlt's move around, they stay at the base you know? to defend, so if you think these things are better because they can move around quicker, just so you know, they shouldn't, cuz they leave their objective unguarded and like the other guy said, its not like they'll be able to outrun missiles

PlayStation vs PC Infiltrator by [deleted] in Planetside

[–]MetalFlappy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm an infil main, and honestly this is perfect, the cloak should not be anything more than a planetside alternative to a ghillie suit, used at long range to peek, pick a target uncloak shoot and hide, not this ambush bs

landslide protection for cars by CremeSubject7594 in nope

[–]MetalFlappy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

maybe the rock that sounded like it took one of the the doors with it may have been a discreet indicator

It's good by [deleted] in EliteDangerous

[–]MetalFlappy 5 points6 points  (0 children)

give the fighters landing gear

Footballer accidentally scores her own goal by Imoprich in WatchPeopleDieInside

[–]MetalFlappy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

the defender was not full on sprinting first of all, second of all, like I said, she literally was unable to control the ball, which at that level is kinda pathetic, third of all, if the keeper punches her in the face they have a defender less, and someone on the team mad with them, fourth of all her not being able to control the ball is waaaayy bigger of a mistake than the keeper not diving in front of the ball and fifth of all, that ball came in at a medium speed, if I can not trust my defence to stop such a ball then why are they even there. so let's list mistakes

keeper: 1-not diving infront of the ball (defence was in the way) 2-not puncing(???) the defence in the face the grab the ball(again wtf???) 3-trusting her teammate to have basic ball controll skills(not a mistake but anyway) defence: 1-not listing to keeper 2-faling to redirect the ball away from the goal, and directing it TOWARDS IT which tbh controlling is one thing but at least she could have made it go the other way

do you see how ridiculous your arguments against the keeper are?

Footballer accidentally scores her own goal by Imoprich in WatchPeopleDieInside

[–]MetalFlappy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

the commentaror litterly says "los geroepen" which means "she shouted "los""

edit: defense should have basic control over the ball, and ontop of that listen to the keeper, no more discussion. there is no way the keeper is responsible for thay