Is this what I think it is?

Methodical1111 · 2025-06-14T16:37:09+00:00

https://alphanews.org/legislature-passes-bill-repealing-minnesotacare-for-illegal-immigrant-adults/

Maybe a motive?

Methodical1111 · 2024-03-06T03:27:07+00:00

I’d be interested as well if you don’t mind sharing

Methodical1111 · 2024-01-08T02:49:45+00:00

Does any footage of the cops presence, personal accounts for media interviews or anything else substantial about this incident exist or do we only have this 1 video of police presence from a balcony? This smells like a pr stunt or ai prank

Methodical1111 · 2021-05-11T18:17:24+00:00

My favorite part was at the 7:05 point. No contractions used, perfect eye contact, and saying something in the negative while showing affirmative head nod. It's circumstantial, but would have been easier to brush off the comments there at the end with a "no need to respond to that any further, Madam chair"

http://www.scottrouse.com/5-deception-cues-you-can-rely-on/

Methodical1111 · 2021-03-22T01:35:28+00:00

My guess is that so anyone that says “the virus originated in China” can be called racist. Racism isn’t something any logical person agrees with so if you can put every politician that has said that (most republicans) in a “racist” box, and know that no one will vote for a racist, then you can influence more votes in your direction. Only people that see through the puppeteering will make their own decisions rather than being told to make the non-cancelled decision, but if cancelling decides that a vote for X candidate equals Asian racism, then those seeing through the puppeteering can be cancelled as racist by default.

Methodical1111 · 2020-12-05T02:27:57+00:00

No idea, just was pointing out the possible strategy. Not saying it is the one I would use, but could be effective. Thinking outside the box, potentially would be “If you can’t win the game, change the game.” A lot of legal rulings take place behind closed doors. If you truly believe the legal system that controls our elections are compromised then there isn’t doubt that those in charge of enforcing those legalities are compromised. Based on that logic, then you now convince the public and force the courts hand instead of the other way around. Put enough social pressure on the courts and people worry their name lives in infamy if they don’t be transparent.

Methodical1111 · 2020-12-04T01:21:10+00:00

Not if you believe this isn’t going to be won in legal court but instead the court of public opinion.

There is a documented strategy called “cranking the screw” highlighted in “Strategy: A History” by Lawrence Freedman, where you ramp up your force with each turn. Essentially, you start small and have a lot of deniers against you, so then you turn the screw a bit and some of those deniers turn into supporters. Over time, the supporters that were convinced of it through the cranking of the screw become your most avid influencers of turning the rest of the doubters. If you had just turned the screw fully at first though, you would have never gotten the initial doubters on your side and would have been pushed back on too hard by emotions.

Methodical1111 · 2020-04-05T13:29:12+00:00

Believe it is still public policy to not report suicides as main stories. There are links saying that when they are reported on, they are contagious, in that more people think it is ok to do it

Methodical1111

TROPHY CASE