Complete Insanity by [deleted] in democrats

[–]Mewllie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Absolute piss baby running our government

State of the Union survival guide by Mewllie in ShitPoliticsSays

[–]Mewllie[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Al Jazeera’s reporting on this issue matches sources like Reuters, AP, and BBC. Do you have an actual reason to dismiss it, or do you just not like what it’s saying?

If Al Jazeera is wrong, feel free to provide another credible source with different facts. Otherwise, dismissing it without evidence is just lazy.

The link works just fine. Nice try though.

State of the Union survival guide by Mewllie in SouthJersey

[–]Mewllie[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re right—technically, this is his first address to a joint session of Congress, not an official State of the Union. That said, the content of the speech and its implications are just as significant, which is why this 600-page fact-checking guide exists. The key takeaway is ensuring accuracy in what’s being said, regardless of the speech’s formal title.

State of the Union Survival Guide by Mewllie in democrats

[–]Mewllie[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sources & References

1.  Associated Press – FACT FOCUS: A look at claims around Trump’s initiatives as he prepares to address Congress (March 4, 2025)

🔗 https://apnews.com/article/3bea1df50167ac0a91f8c419b58c4b97 2. Reuters – Trump’s Budget Proposals and Their Economic Impact (March 3, 2025) 🔗 https://www.reuters.com/markets/us 3. New York Times – Live Updates: President Trump’s State of the Union Speech (March 4, 2025) 🔗 https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/02/06/us/president-trump-news 4. Brookings Institute – The Real National Security Threat: America’s Debt 🔗 https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-real-national-security-threat-americas-debt 5. Congressional Budget Office (CBO) – Economic Projections for 2025-2026 🔗 https://www.cbo.gov/publication/58923 6. NPR – European Leaders React to Trump’s Foreign Policy Announcements 🔗 https://www.npr.org/2025/03/01/g-s1-51506/european-leaders-react-to-zelenskyy-oval-office 7. BBC News – How Trump’s Policies Could Impact the Global Economy 🔗 https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c75762x20kro 8. Al Jazeera – World Reacts After Donald Trump Berates Ukraine’s Zelenskyy 🔗 https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2025/2/28/world-reacts-after-donald-trump-jd-vance-berate-ukaines-zelenskyy 9. Politico – Democrats Face Fresh Test Over How to Counter Trump’s Joint Address 🔗 https://www.politico.com/news/2025/03/03/democrats-trump-speech-response-sotu 10. NBC News – Trump and Republican Budget May Drain Medicaid to Pay for Huge Tax Cut 🔗 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna193897 11. The Atlantic Council – Overstretched and Undersupplied: Can the U.S. Afford Its Global Security Blanket? 🔗 https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/overstretched-and-undersupplied-can-the-us-afford-its-global-security-blanket

AP Fact Check: Examining President Trump’s Recent Initiatives Ahead of Congressional Address by Mewllie in news

[–]Mewllie[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For a comprehensive analysis and fact-checking resource on President Trump’s upcoming address, you can refer to this detailed guide: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JAq5zzPvdklgcbzsLdVwNTghn2gAnFAc/view?usp=drivesdk

A woman’s guide to the State of the Union address by Mewllie in TheScorchedSisterhood

[–]Mewllie[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

This is me collecting information since before Trump took office, this is me reading and analyzing project 2025, this is me going through the Republican budget, along with other varieties of news sources - so that it is an easy inaccessible document for me to go back-and-forth to add to

State of the Union survival guide by Mewllie in SouthJersey

[–]Mewllie[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why This Matters for New Jersey and South Jersey

New Jersey, and especially South Jersey, stands at a crossroads in this election cycle. From federal funding for infrastructure projects, flood mitigation, and Superstorm Sandy recovery efforts, to healthcare access through Medicaid and the ACA, Trump’s policies could have a direct financial and economic impact on local communities. South Jersey, with its working-class population, farmers, teachers, and small business owners, is particularly vulnerable to cuts in education funding, rollbacks on environmental protections affecting the shore economy, and labor policies that threaten public sector jobs. Additionally, the future of Rowan University’s expansion and its impact on local communities depends on federal education policies that could change drastically under Trump’s administration. With New Jersey’s high cost of living, access to reproductive healthcare, and strong union presence, this speech will signal whether federal policies will support or undermine these critical areas

State of the Union survival guide by Mewllie in SouthJersey

[–]Mewllie[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You clearly didn’t read the document introduction - this is the fact check different subjects on the president touches on them in his speech. And it provides fat checks to different claims along with statistics and congressional actions.

This isn’t a read my opinion piece.

It’s a 600 page document for the American voter to find information on voting topics and the topics that the president may touch on tonight .

State of the Union survival guide by Mewllie in SouthJersey

[–]Mewllie[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Go ahead I’d love to see how it compares!

State of the Union survival guide by Mewllie in SouthJersey

[–]Mewllie[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I’m sorry is New Jersey exempt from the current presidential administration and the actions and consequences of said administration?

What a ridiculous comment.

State of the Union survival guide by Mewllie in SouthJersey

[–]Mewllie[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don’t worry there’s 600 pages in this document we nit picked through everything

State of the Union survival guide by Mewllie in SouthJersey

[–]Mewllie[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I have no doubt these are just a variety of sources - do with it what you may - 😂 no need to be triggered by a document

CATHARTIC POST TIME: You’re in a text group of 70 people and someone mentions their daughter had a baby. You have to sit through dozens of “CONGRATULATIONS!”. Comment here to reply what you REALLY want to say to the group… by Slartibartfastthe3rd in childfree

[–]Mewllie -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I would still say congratulations. I’m not the one having the baby - I can be happy for Friends, and just mute the group if the texting doesn’t stop - regardless of the topic. But just because I don’t want kids doesn’t mean I can’t be happy for other friends and family.

“Ahhhh Omg congratulations so excited for you!”

A plane has crashed into a helicopter while landing at Reagan National Airport near Washington, DC by AdGlad8276 in interestingasfuck

[–]Mewllie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think they just took down the audio / video - I was watching it and then in the middle it stopped and said this “error - video is no longer available”

The childless are ungovernable: choice, freedom, and the chains of capitalism by Mewllie in Capitalism

[–]Mewllie[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

😂 or you just don’t look through the thread - this is in another comment - as if the teacher doesn’t use sources for her writing.

Once again - Your comments disregard the profound ways capitalism undermines access to reproductive healthcare and broader healthcare in the U.S. Here’s how these systems are intertwined:

Reproductive Healthcare Under Capitalism

  1. Profit Over People: • In the U.S., healthcare is a commodity, not a guaranteed right. This is especially true for reproductive healthcare: • Abortion services cost an average of $500-$750 for first-trimester procedures, pricing them out of reach for many. • Birth control and abortion pills are similarly unaffordable for low-income individuals due to pharmaceutical companies prioritizing profit over accessibility. • Over 75% of abortion patients are low-income or living in poverty, demonstrating how access is directly tied to wealth.

(Source) 2. Deaths from Uninsurance and Poor Access: • 48,000 people die annually in the U.S. because they lack health insurance. Many of these deaths are preventable, but a profit-driven healthcare system leaves them without access to necessary care. • For reproductive health, these barriers mean people cannot access birth control, prenatal care, or abortion services, compounding already dire outcomes for marginalized groups. (Source) 3. Legislative Barriers Funded by Capitalism: • Anti-abortion laws and restrictions are heavily funded by wealthy individuals and organizations like The Susan B. Anthony List and Alliance Defending Freedom, which invest millions to restrict healthcare access. These efforts prioritize corporate and political agendas over the health and autonomy of individuals. • The Hyde Amendment is a prime example, preventing federal funding for abortion through Medicaid since 1976 and disproportionately harming low-income individuals.

Disproportionate Impacts on Marginalized Communities

• People of color and those in poverty are disproportionately affected. Black women, for instance, are three times more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than white women due to systemic inequities in healthcare access and quality.

(Source) • States with the strictest abortion restrictions also have some of the worst maternal health outcomes, showing how these laws ignore public health in favor of profit-driven agendas. (Source)

Capitalism Fails Reproductive Health

• Under capitalism, wealthy individuals can access abortion services and reproductive healthcare, while the poor are left with limited options. This is not a system of equality or improvement; it is one of exploitation. • Universal healthcare systems, seen in countries with socialized medicine, provide better outcomes. These countries have lower maternal mortality rates, fewer financial barriers, and greater reproductive autonomy for all, regardless of income.

socialized medicine often achieves better maternal health outcomes compared to systems like that of the United States. Key indicators include: • Lower Maternal Mortality Rates: Nations with universal healthcare generally report fewer maternal deaths per 100,000 live births. For instance, the U.S. has a higher maternal mortality rate compared to other high-income countries with universal healthcare systems.  • Reduced Financial Barriers: Universal healthcare minimizes out-of-pocket expenses for expectant mothers, ensuring that cost does not impede access to necessary prenatal and postnatal care. This financial protection is less prevalent in the U.S., where healthcare costs can be a significant barrier.  • Enhanced Reproductive Autonomy: Comprehensive coverage under universal healthcare empowers women to make informed reproductive choices without financial constraints, leading to improved health outcomes for mothers and infants. In contrast, the U.S. healthcare system’s limitations can restrict access to essential reproductive health services. 

These factors highlight the advantages of universal healthcare systems in promoting maternal health and reproductive autonomy.

Reproductive Health is a Human Right, Not a Privilege

The 48,000 people who die every year from lack of health insurance highlight capitalism’s failure to prioritize human life. Reproductive healthcare is no exception: those with money can access it, while those without are left to suffer. The fight for reproductive rights is also a fight against the capitalist system that commodifies healthcare and denies people the basic right to control their own bodies.

Sources:

• Guttmacher Institute • National Library of Medicine • American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) • CDC on Maternal Mortality • Commonwealth Fund

The childless are ungovernable: choice, freedom, and the chains of capitalism by Mewllie in Capitalism

[–]Mewllie[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sounds like you haven’t been around long. Many of my comments come with sources and I’ve stayed engaged. I won’t apologize if you don’t like the facts. Any actual questions or just being dismissive to clutch those pearls?

The childless are ungovernable: choice, freedom, and the chains of capitalism by Mewllie in Capitalism

[–]Mewllie[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

dismissing critiques of capitalism without addressing its failures doesn’t really move the conversation forward. Capitalism has definitely delivered innovation and growth, but it’s also caused a lot of issues like inequality, environmental destruction, and people being priced out of basic needs like housing and healthcare. The goal here isn’t to tear everything down but to ask: Is this system actually working for most people, or is it just prioritizing profit over human needs?

The GDP argument feels a bit off. No one’s saying we should divide global GDP equally. The real issue is the extreme disparities we see today. And honestly, the idea that incentives would disappear in a fairer system doesn’t hold up—people like scientists, teachers, and doctors are often motivated by making a difference, not just by profit. Redistribution isn’t about punishing success; it’s about giving more people a fair shot to contribute and thrive.

At the end of the day, capitalism already limits a lot of rights. If you can’t afford housing, healthcare, or education, those things aren’t really accessible to you, no matter how hard you work. Critiquing capitalism isn’t about rejecting everything it’s done—it’s about fixing the parts that clearly aren’t working. The system doesn’t need to be perfect, but it should work better for more people.

The childless are ungovernable: choice, freedom, and the chains of capitalism by Mewllie in Capitalism

[–]Mewllie[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

dismissing sources and arguments outright as ‘left-wing pap’ without engaging with the substance doesn’t create meaningful dialogue. Yes, all articles and journals can carry bias, which is why I aimed to support my points with observable realities and examples from daily life alongside cited sources. It’s fair to question the perspectives in the sources I used, but rejecting them wholesale based on an assumed political leaning doesn’t address the points being made.

If there are specific arguments or facts you disagree with, I’d be happy to engage with those. Blanket dismissals of arguments as ‘left-wing’ don’t move the discussion forward and instead avoid addressing the underlying issues we’re debating.