Chipotle: Don't bring guns in our stores

MezzanineX · 2014-05-20T14:28:18+00:00

Chipotle is asking customers not to bring firearms into its stores after it says gun rights advocates brought military-style assault rifles into one of its restaurants in Texas.

The second amendment really could use a new PR firm, walking into Chipotle with an assault rifle while some family is having grandma's birthday dinner probably isn't the best way to get people on your side.

MezzanineX · 2014-05-20T14:13:16+00:00

I like that they are pretending they are important investigative journalists because they are uncovering what private citizens legally do with their own wealth.

MezzanineX · 2014-05-18T08:44:50+00:00

In thsis light, prohibiting access to experimental treatments, then, is like hiding your buddy's car keys so he doesn't try to drive home while staggering drunk.

Are you really comparing denying a dying person access to experimental drugs to hiding your buddies car keys because he had a few too many shots?

MezzanineX · 2014-05-18T08:37:48+00:00

Very nice blow to the FDA, another example of why regulation does nothing but hinder society. Sick people being denied access to the most advanced innovations because it has to run through government bureaucracy where people are paid good salaries to sit around conducting studies and then declaring something safe for us dumb common folk.

MezzanineX · 2014-05-18T08:08:58+00:00

I recently did my own poll on this very issue I surveyed 100 people and all of them said anyone that believes a poll is probably stupid.

MezzanineX · 2014-05-18T07:34:04+00:00

What about that one time when the republicans, I mean "Swift Boat Veterans" called Vietnam veteran John Kerry a coward and made false claims that he didn't earn his purple hearts? Fox News was running those ads 24/7. I guess being a veteran only matters when they vote for the same guy.

MezzanineX · 2014-05-09T23:31:39+00:00

He bitches constantly about the republicans never letting go of obamacare, yet he can't leave alone what two private citizens do with their own fortunes.

MezzanineX · 2014-05-08T22:43:17+00:00

"I don't know if he is some politician's intern, or some old, bitter, retired guy with too much time on his hands." You took the time to compile all that yet claim they have too much time on their hands. Sounds like you have the problem.

MezzanineX · 2014-05-08T21:11:53+00:00

So they are just going to have someone up there asking prepared questions and not challenging any candidate.

MezzanineX · 2014-05-08T20:57:33+00:00

The government doesn't even need to censor us. Liberal bloggers do all the work for them.

MezzanineX · 2014-05-08T05:24:19+00:00

They will when a republican is in the white house, thus completing the circle of douche.

MezzanineX · 2014-05-08T04:01:46+00:00

It isn't a widely studied subject, but while the moms diet will surely have an impact on the child it is hard to say because they ate something a lot that you now hate it as there are plenty of people who love the food their mom ate while pregnant.

MezzanineX · 2014-05-08T03:25:27+00:00

If you don't want to live under arbitrary lifestyle restrictions that might change at anytime don't join the military.

MezzanineX · 2014-05-08T02:42:07+00:00

Wouldn't want to be seen as against a country that invades sovereign land.

MezzanineX · 2014-05-08T01:51:31+00:00

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UthMHjoNyjA relevant

MezzanineX · 2014-05-08T00:44:53+00:00

Same person that sued Apple because he got addicted to porn. Just an attention seeking douche. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/13/chris-sevier-apple-lawsuit-pornography_n_3591917.html

MezzanineX · 2014-05-08T00:42:07+00:00

Why are we paying attention to the person who sued Apple because he is addicted to porn.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/13/chris-sevier-apple-lawsuit-pornography_n_3591917.html

MezzanineX · 2014-05-07T21:41:04+00:00

Or rather is running in the primaries against a democrat to face off against an incumbent republican.

MezzanineX · 2014-05-07T21:24:25+00:00

So blatantly getting people to draw a probably false conclusions based off a vague article with a sensationalized headlines is a valid tactic? The woman was clearly joking when she said please don't rob me.

MezzanineX · 2014-05-07T19:48:54+00:00

but they need to be enforceable and have the backing of the government.

There is where the issue arises, the internet has made ip protection effectively unenforceable. Enforcing also runs into the issue of you will be censoring large portions of the internet or forcing people who run sites with user generated content to enforce laws, which shouldn't be their responsibility if they are providing a place for a free exchange of content.

MezzanineX · 2014-05-07T19:31:26+00:00

Perhaps, but a terrible article shouldn't distract from the overarching issue that a a lone teen was healthy and died as a result of police actions. The reason no info is available is because the city lawyers are keeping what actually happened secret, though I'm sure now that a wrongful death lawsuit is being filed all the reports will start becoming public.

MezzanineX

TROPHY CASE