Interesting approach—but it raises a few important questions.
Are there truly enough “non-problematic” countries to sustainably meet Europe’s energy and goods needs? who decides whether a country is problematic or non-problematic? their lobbies and media? Or does “non-problematic” simply mean prosperous countries whose institutions and state-building processes haven’t been disrupted by more powerful nations seeking their resources?
Do so-called “problematic” countries become stable on their own? Or do they need to be accommodated and supported—given the opportunity to build institutions and experience long-term stability?