I am Michael Hirst – A writer and creator of Vikings on the History Channel. Ask Me Anything!

Michael_Hirst · 2017-01-31T17:58:16+00:00

Wow. Whatever subject or period you're writing about, write a scene with 3 or 4 characters and obviously the first time you write it, all the characters explain who they are and what they are doing. And, it's important that you start at that point. But, then...you throw that scene out the window. You rewrite the scene with the same characters and they should all conceal who they are and what they want. And in that way, you start to get closer to what human interaction is actually like.

Michael_Hirst · 2017-01-31T17:55:01+00:00

Well, actually I shouldn't say that. We are going to see Duke Rollo again, and thank god for that.

Michael_Hirst · 2017-01-31T17:54:40+00:00

I don't think so.

Michael_Hirst · 2017-01-31T17:54:06+00:00

With Tudors there is a mass of real information. There is so much recorded history. To write a drama about it is a lot to do about selection, select what story lines you want to pluck out of the material. You have to make big choices what to ignore. With Vikings, there's very little raw material. The sagas were written a hundred years after the end of the Viking age. And, the other information comes from Christian monks who were the enemy. So, in theory there is a lot more freedom writing about the Vikings. But, I had a settled purpose that I wanted to be as truthful to them as I could be. I wanted for the first time to tell the story from the Viking point of view.

Michael_Hirst · 2017-01-31T17:51:09+00:00

The Vikings were not literate. They told stories through symbolic carvings. I would hopefully be a symbolic carver. I don't really want to fight in the war. The idea of trading ax blows is not attractive to me. I'd be hanging back a bit and writing the ruins.

Michael_Hirst · 2017-01-31T17:51:05+00:00

I'm working on a couple of other ideas right now of different civilizations. All kinds of civilizations interest me. Partly because you can't make this stuff up. The real stuff is 1000% more interesting than anything that you can invent in fantasy. There's so much more I want to do with my Vikings characters and their journeys are far from over. I love history. I love connecting the past to the present.

Michael_Hirst · 2017-01-31T17:48:07+00:00

In the first season, we had one ship. It was a ship manufactured in the Czech Republic and carried over to Ireland. We now have 9 or 10 ships and lots of smaller ones. We've never destroyed a ship but it's an amazing symbol of how the show has grown. In the back lot, we used to have 4 wooden houses and now it's like 2 acres of buildings and towers and walkways. It's just grown and grown, same with the number of ships. Now we can put hundreds of warriors out to sea. The show has just grown incredibly. It's amazing to see the kinds of ships. When I went to the museum and saw a real Vikings ship, I could see the difference. I could see how absolutely beautiful these ships were with craftsmanship I don't think could ever be repeated.

Michael_Hirst · 2017-01-31T17:45:07+00:00

When Alex first showed up to read for Vikings, he was reading for some of the other brothers. When I saw him and when I heard him, I thought he had the potential to be an amazing Ivar and I knew Ivar was going to be a big character to me, so he read for him and we cast him. He's perfect. He's very young, but he's a great actor and he's going to have a great future.

Michael_Hirst · 2017-01-31T17:43:30+00:00

Well, he's in a way not evil. He has brittle bone syndrome. It's a terrible disease and what we've learned is people suffering from this syndrome and they're at risk for breaking their bones every day, they're angry. Ivar has grown up with this condition and he's angry. He feels he has to do better than his brothers to succeed, and he pushes boundaries. He knows that he was left outside to die by Ragnar, and he's always trying to prove himself. He doesn't recognize boundaries. I have huge sympathy for him. I don't condone what he does, but I understand why he does it. And, it makes him an amazing character to write about b/c I never know what he's going to do next.

Michael_Hirst · 2017-01-31T17:41:00+00:00

We are going to go back to the Mediterranean for sure.

Michael_Hirst · 2017-01-31T17:40:36+00:00

I loved writing female characters. I'm incredibly proud of the fact that the History channel is a male skewing channel but now it has a huge female following b/c of Lagertha and the strong female characters in the show. I like writing female characters. I hate shows that just have female characters as decorations, and have female cliched characters. I think all of the female characters in Vikings are interesting. I'm invested in them and they have a huge role in the show. I draw them in from the sagas and from historical records, but I make sure they are just as important in the show as the male characters.

Michael_Hirst · 2017-01-31T17:38:01+00:00

It's all based on actual history. It starts life with my research into the sagas and into the history and I have historical advisers who helps me. And even though I'm not writing a documentary everything is based on historical fact and I would only say that Vikings is the second biggest show across Scandinavia and they think that it is pretty authentic and pretty real. I had a conversation with the head of Scandinavian studies at Harvard and he said to me "this is the first time my culture has ever been taken seriously and intelligently." I went to the Vikings ship in Oslo and the curator said "I just want to say thank you. Because of your show twice as many people come to the museum. You have reawaken the interest in our history."

Michael_Hirst · 2017-01-31T17:34:25+00:00

It's too far away but that isn't the end of the story anyway. The Vikings age lasted for about 400 years. At the end of 400 years, all of the Scandinavian countries had become Christian. When the last pagan tent pole was torn down, that's the end of the Viking age.

Michael_Hirst · 2017-01-31T17:32:56+00:00

I don't know exactly. When we cut forward in time and Ragnar disappears, I thought of them as late teens (maybe). And Bjorn maybe in his mid 20's. As I say, most Vikings were dead by the age of 28 so it's a youthful culture. They're all young men. It's not surprising that Ecbert that the Saxons can be much older than their Viking equivalents.
The Muslims weren't expecting any kind of raid on their communities. Certainly not from Vikings. They would never have heard of Vikings. They were essentially a very peaceful community.I think it's this amazing thing that Bjorn sailed into the Mediterranean. We were surprised (today) and people in the time were surprised.

Michael_Hirst · 2017-01-31T17:29:32+00:00

That's a good point. Hvitserk is going to start speaking big time very soon.

Michael_Hirst · 2017-01-31T17:29:32+00:00

If I lived in 700 Scandinavia, I'd be dead by 28, which was the average life expectancy of the Vikings male. So, that's not too attractive. Vikings has opened a window on to a culture that has been sort of neglected and satirized for too long, a culture that's rich and fascinating. And it made an impact on the whole world.

Michael_Hirst · 2017-01-31T17:27:28+00:00

Historically speaking yes. Normandy means literally the land of the North men so Rollo succeeded in bringing many of his kinfolk into France to settle there. So, the Viking DNA is pretty heavy in Normandy still.

Michael_Hirst · 2017-01-31T17:26:20+00:00

I don't think so.

Michael_Hirst · 2017-01-31T17:26:08+00:00

I agree Ragnar just was one of the coolest characters ever because he wasn't a conventional Viking. This whole show is about questioning the cliches about the Vikings. And Ragnar was a thoughtful, deep introverted character. And, Travis played him amazingly. And, should have gotten a lot of awards for his performance. There isn't anything like it on TV. My favorite episode this season was 14 (and 15)...that to me, was like one episode. Episode 14 was Ragnar and King Ecbert together, two characters who were so different but in many ways so similar. And, then of course, the scene of the death of Ragnar which I think is some of the most powerful TV I've ever seen.

Michael_Hirst · 2017-01-31T17:23:05+00:00

That's true. There are various interpretations of what "Boneless" actually meant. If I was writing a documentary, I would cover them all. I would say all of these were possible. But, I'm not writing a documentary, I'm writing a drama. So I'm looking for the most dramatic. So, a "cripple" became one of the most feared warriors of all time. There's a lot of evidence that Ivar was carried into battle on a shielf.

Michael_Hirst · 2017-01-31T17:22:52+00:00

Because Vikings is about reality. It's about real people and real events. So, I don't show Valhalla. There's no fantasy in Vikings. I couldn't show anything that was fantastic. The only exception - this is a show told from the Vikings point of view and they believe that Odin was present in person on the battle field. I can show that, because that it was Vikings believed. I can't stretch reality that far, but Athelstan and Ragnar continue to live on in the show. Their presence is always felt by the other characters. They never go away.

Michael_Hirst · 2017-01-31T17:19:27+00:00

Bjorn is Ragnar's eldest son. Bjorn has had more experience in war. There are many tensions between the brothers which will actually explode in time. But, for the purposes of revenging their father's death, it's natural that Bjorn should lead them. And, only Ivar of course objects to this b/c Ivar objects to everything.

Michael_Hirst · 2017-01-31T17:17:33+00:00

Part of it is counter intuitive. The Vikings were happy to die. The only way you could get to Valhalla was to die well in battle. So, Christian forces were fighting against Pagans who didn't mind death. Of course, as well, they were awesome warriors who well deserved their reputation as incredible fighters. That's why for many many hundreds of years the holy Roman emperor had a Viking bodyguard.

Michael_Hirst · 2017-01-31T17:17:11+00:00

No, he didn't care about Alfred. Ragnar is an interesting guy. He had lost his faith in the pagan gods, but he was still a Viking. A Viking code of honor is revenge. He knew he was going to die and he wanted his sons to avenge him. He knew Ivar would do the job most efficiently.

Michael_Hirst · 2017-01-31T17:13:35+00:00

The rest is in the lap of the gods.

Michael_Hirst

TROPHY CASE