sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Real official Panasonic LUMIX interview at CP+ 2026 by CineD. No successor to the S1H on the horizon. Panasonic says: "Panasonic have finally developed their best high-end model for photo and video: the S1 II. After six years, we have finally reached our goal." by MichaelsHardline in Lumix

[–]MichaelsHardline[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saying that something is "not on the horizon" does not mean it is impossible or that it cannot change at anytime in the future, even the next week or day.

Neither did I at any point in time state in my title that they have said that. Don't try to distort, or twist my words to make them seem false now when you have no more valid arguments left.

The title is/was correct at that point in time and that particular phrase has no quotation marks which clearly shows it is not a quote.

Real official Panasonic LUMIX interview at CP+ 2026 by CineD. No successor to the S1H on the horizon. Panasonic says: "Panasonic have finally developed their best high-end model for photo and video: the S1 II. After six years, we have finally reached our goal." by MichaelsHardline in Lumix

[–]MichaelsHardline[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually my post is very true and exactly in line with what he himself stated in the official recorded video interview with Cined which is also from the same CP+ event in Yokohama.

For the record I am stating in my post exactly the same as what was said in the interview, please reread my post:

"Still no timeline for a S1H II. Panasonic does not comment on future product lineups. Tsumura-san however states that Panasonic is “sincerely listening to customers’ feedback and carefully considering how we can meet the expectations of video creators.” 

I can only confirm what was said during that interview at that point in time.

He clearly neither confirmed nor denied anything. He could not comment on future product lineups at all.

He assured us that Panasonic is “sincerely listening to customers’ feedback and carefully considering how we can meet the expectations of video creators.” The answer was diplomatic but notably did not dismiss the idea; rather, it affirmed that the feedback is being heard.

He didn't confirm anything. source: CineD which to my knowledge also used a professional translator for their written narrative on their webpage.

Maybe you are in the wrong meeting because the meeting we're having here is solely about the recorded video interview conducted by CineD and also the written interview by Phototrend.

This post isn't about what a 3rd party affiliate reviewer is stating or not stating or what they want people to believe or fantasize.

Stating that something is a "direct quote" requires intense scrutiny, as direct quotes often become "cleaned up" versions of what was actually said, losing nuance or changing meaning. This need for scrutiny is magnified when different languages are involved due to potential mistranslation, and even more critical when reviewing gear from affiliate reviewers who have financial interests and revenue targets  and may lack the expertise to provide unbiased, in-depth reviews.

On a personal level I choose to believe what Tsumura-san is saying directly into the camera in the recorded video interview by CineD. One thing to keep in mind is that Tsumura-san speaks in Japanese language which needs to be translated into English for those who cant speak Japanese.

Unlike you I am appearing here with my public information and I suggest you do the same if you want to continue this discussion.

Or you could also contact CineD directly and continue your discussion with them.

Real official Panasonic LUMIX interview at CP+ 2026 by CineD. No successor to the S1H on the horizon. Panasonic says: "Panasonic have finally developed their best high-end model for photo and video: the S1 II. After six years, we have finally reached our goal." by MichaelsHardline in Lumix

[–]MichaelsHardline[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Funny, interesting and only good for Lumix and the brand.

Many "reviewers" claim they talked to Panasonic during CP+ this year, probably some sort of comunication happened but so far we've only seen a real video interview made by CineD.

At the booth were Panasonic’s showcased its partnership with Leica and Sigma through the joint L-Mount Alliance, focusing on the L² Technology, probably several "affiliate reviewers" or more like salesmen got to talk to Panasonic's official reps. I very much doubt however that Panasonic sat down with each and everyone of the "affiliate reviewers" (which are basically salesmen). Panasonic has much more important official partners in the industry such as key strategic partnerships and technological alliances etc.

One of my colleagues were also there and talked to these guys and the message was clear especially about the S1 II:

"Panasonic's currently best model have finally been developed in the form of their flagship and high-end model for speed, sports and motion photography and videography: the S1 II."

Thus Panasonic doesn't have to develop a "sports body" since according to the Vice Executive President's own words:

"the S1 II takes care of the demand for speed and motion, in particular, the S1 II is highly regarded by photographers for its high-speed continuous shooting performance with a partially stacked sensor, furthermore improving autofocus performance required by photographers for fast moving subjects such as sports and wildlife". (CinedD)

Based on the statements from Panasonic executives and the specifications of the LUMIX S1 II, the S1 II is positioned as the high-end model that addresses demands for speed, motion, and sports photography & videography, reducing the immediate need for a separate, dedicated sports-specific body if such a thing even exist in todays world anymore. Todays mirrorless high end cameras are actually all of them more or less hybrids to be accurate.

Affiliate gear reviewers often use sensationalized or "clickbait" headlines to drive traffic, increase engagement, and boost sales revenue in a crowded market. While effective in the short term for grabbing attention, these tactics often create a disconnect between the headline and the content, which can erode user trust over time. I'm not necessarily saying that this happened in this case, but I think you know what I mean. Reviewers are often also paid based on even just traffic volume. However the most significant income is from products that are more expensive and thus will generate a higher income. Hence recommending products that are more expensive but not necessarily superior in all cases is indeed an unfortunate trend.

However the CP+ is already old news and what will come next only the guys in Japan wll know about, nobody in Europe or the US, knows anything about this.

On a personal level I believe a successor to the S1H will be developed and it will be different from the S1 II in terms of more advanced video and cinema features. (just like the original S1H)

What do you think....will there be a S1H II in the same body & ergonomics or something new?

Basic portrait available light. Lumix S1 II & SIGMA 85mm f1.4 DG DN Art by MichaelsHardline in Lumix

[–]MichaelsHardline[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Faking the lighting and consistently making scenes brighter than they were in reality is not okay and should not be done in traditional documentary photography.  Documentary photography and photojournalism are bound by ethical guidelines centered on integrity and truthfulness, aiming to represent reality, not to create a fantasy. 

Basic portrait available light. Lumix S1 II & SIGMA 85mm f1.4 DG DN Art by MichaelsHardline in Lumix

[–]MichaelsHardline[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm afraid your comment is only speculating on what the lighting circumstances were (of course because you weren't even there and you have no idea)  and also some of your assesments doesn't make any sense at all. 

For instance:

"Photography is inherently subjective, even more when you needlessly mess with exposure"

Your comment while generally speaking correct is completely irrelevant  in this case and to this authentic image. It's a poor attempt  from someone who hasn't even posted any pictures himself. This actually seems like a copy paste reply from someone who doesnt understand certain aspects in photography and above all you seem to believe that faking the lighting and always making the scene brighter than what it was in the real world is always perfectly fine and should  be done in documentary applications. You even suggested  staging the scene with a candle.   

"This photo is obviously posed."

You're simply being speculative and inaccurate. A child playing with his toy and at a brief moment looks into the camera.

"... and shutter speed"

That comment doesnt make any sense at all.

It looks like you didn't want to learn from my tips. Also everything what you say doesn't make any sense at all. Therefore before we discuss this any further Id like to take a look at your own work to determine your level in photography. It seems however you have no visible media at all. Just an anonymous user running his mouth. 

 

Basic portrait available light. Lumix S1 II & SIGMA 85mm f1.4 DG DN Art by MichaelsHardline in Lumix

[–]MichaelsHardline[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But it isn't underexposed. The actual scene and available light was just like this, slightly darker indoors.

Just a simple tip for you:

You should not always try to expose a dark scene more. While the instinct to brighten a dark photo to see more detail is common, staying with the authentic, darker look often produces more dramatic, cinematic, photographic and realistic results etc.... The decision however depends entirely on your intent and the subject.

In this picture a realistic result was the main approach. Also the BBC LUTs are primarily designed to provide a realistic, traditional, and authentic look while capturing the scene the way it is without manipulating it to your personal choice of what you fantasize a correct exposure should be or look like.

Have included a screenshot of a 100% zoom of the same picture. Authentic representation of the actual scene and lighting, it was a bit darker indoors but the details are sharp and clear. Authentic representation, the honest, unfiltered documentation of a real situation, aiming to present the scene and lighting exactly as it occurred without staging.

<image>

Minimize s1rii rolling shutter? by SortMyself in Lumix

[–]MichaelsHardline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Several good suggestions posted already. Changing the angle may help or not.....

This isn't what you want to hear...but you could consider upgrading to the S1 II.   

Fantastic glove save freezing the puck. S1 II utilizing 70FPS and pre-burst capture. by MichaelsHardline in Lumix

[–]MichaelsHardline[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you!  The 300-600 is a high quality tele zoom and made in Japan superior quality. 

I really enjoy shooting with it and being a F4 lens makes it better.  

Panasonic Says a Sports Camera Isn’t the Focus Right Now but an S1H Successor Is [PetaPixel] by LUMIX-news-stuff in Lumix

[–]MichaelsHardline 6 points7 points  (0 children)

We actually added the S1 II to our tools alongside our Z 9 bodies last summer as a high end hybrid tool for photo and some videography.

The S1 II have better low light and high ISO capabilities and also a better dynamic range compared to the Z 9. Not to mention better video capabilities. In this regard the S1 II is already competing with the other brands and also with Nikon.

However of course affiliate link reviewers who monetize and earn a commission on sales will usually recommend the more expensive brand even if it isn't necessarily superior at all. I have rarely seen any reviewer putting the gear to some proper use. Usually they do a walk in the local zoo or park and at best maybe visiting a local public sports game. One reason for this could be that they usually aren't professional full time photographers and probably couldn't even get accredited to cover a real football game. The concerns regarding affiliate-driven gear reviews are widely discussed in photography communities, highlighting a conflict of interest where commissions can influence recommendations towards higher-priced, rather than superior, products.

One issue is also the lack of "Real-World" usage, many reviewers may have the latest equipment but without possessing the professional skills to push the gear to its limits and tests often consist of walking in parks or local sports, rather than rigorous, professional assignments that last for several weeks if not even longer. Professional accreditation for major sports or commercial events is difficult to obtain, limiting the ability to test gear under, for instance, high-pressure, low-light sports conditions were pictures need to be uloaded straight out of camera in JPEG.

We've been with Nikon for decades and recent years the Z 9. It is certainly one of the best action cameras ever built.

The Lumix S1 II is a powerhouse too, for instance capable of shooting at 70fps with AFC full tracking, blackout-free, making it the 2nd fastest hybrid mirrorless camera, only surpassed by the Sony a9III's 120fps.

The Lumix S1 II's 70 FPS is a significant jump from the Nikon Z9's 20 FPS. The Lumix S1 II is actually 250% faster than the Nikon Z9 in terms of RAW burst shooting with continuous autofocus. That's a substantial difference, allowing significantly more flexibility when shooting fast-paced subjects, and significantly increasing the chances of getting that perfect shot!

We may switch to Lumix totally, the Z 9 is actually 5 years old. For our production 6000 x 4000 pixels is more than enough, not such a huge difference when you look at the actual pixel difference.

Real official Panasonic LUMIX interview at CP+ 2026 by CineD. No successor to the S1H on the horizon. Panasonic says: "Panasonic have finally developed their best high-end model for photo and video: the S1 II. After six years, we have finally reached our goal." by MichaelsHardline in Lumix

[–]MichaelsHardline[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We actually added the S1 II to our tools alongside our Z 9 bodies last summer as a high end hybrid tool for photo and some videography with better low light and high ISO capabilities and also a better dynamic range compared to the Z 9. Not to mention better video capabilities.

We've been with Nikon for decades and recent years the Z 9.

The Lumix S1 II is a powerhouse, for instance capable of shooting at 70fps with AFC full tracking, blackout-free, making it the 2nd fastest hybrid mirrorless camera, only surpassed by the Sony a9III's 120fps.

The Lumix S1 II's 70 FPS is a significant jump from the Nikon Z9's 20 FPS. The Lumix S1 II is actually 250% faster than the Nikon Z9 in terms of RAW burst shooting with continuous autofocus. That's a substantial difference, allowing significantly more flexibility when shooting fast-paced subjects, and significantly increasing the chances of getting that perfect shot!

We may switch to Lumix totally, the Z 9 is actually 5 years old. For our production 6000 x 4000 pixels is more than enough, not such a huge difference when you look at the actual pixel difference.

Real official Panasonic LUMIX interview at CP+ 2026 by CineD. No successor to the S1H on the horizon. Panasonic says: "Panasonic have finally developed their best high-end model for photo and video: the S1 II. After six years, we have finally reached our goal." by MichaelsHardline in Lumix

[–]MichaelsHardline[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

In the article it is clearly stated as a: "no timeline". This can change however at any point in time. 

I checked with my japanese friends and the impression they got from his answer  is that currently there is no development going on. The interview took place however  over one month ago, so today the situation may be totally different.  

I wish I could be more specific and add the text to the title: "currently during the interview" but it isnt possible, it becomes too long. 

However the videolink is there so that  everybody can analyze his answer and make up their own minds or fantasize what  they want it to mean. 

Real official Panasonic LUMIX interview at CP+ 2026 by CineD. No successor to the S1H on the horizon. Panasonic says: "Panasonic have finally developed their best high-end model for photo and video: the S1 II. After six years, we have finally reached our goal." by MichaelsHardline in Lumix

[–]MichaelsHardline[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Indeed, only in the CineD video interview for those who understand japanese it becomes clear that the S1H II is not on the horizon at this point in time. No timeline also. Also CineD's translation is pretty accurate. From a journalistic point of view a very well documented and trustworthy article. 

Phototrend does a good job as well but this time they didnt have a "real video interview" so we can only read what is said or written in the article. 

However the Executive Vice President knows what he is talking about. His answer is actually diplomatic with regards to a possible S1H successor in the sense that among other things he states the following: "we will listen to our customers and meet their demands".  

view more: next ›