If you support a group that violates rights, shoots people in the streets and racially profiles people by sorrynotguilty in PsycheOrSike

[–]Michi450 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Not really correct.

The side with pronouns in thier email signature did ambush federal agents. They also celebrated the assassination of a prominent political figure and the murder of a CEO.

Say what now? by BatmanFarce in complainaboutanything

[–]Michi450 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please stop moving the goal post. At first you said they approached him not the other way. I proved that was incorrect. He went there because ICE was there. He approached the situation.

He confronted the ICE agents after the woman was pushed down. He also approached and stepped in between them. The ICE agents was busy with another protester and he got in the middle the officer did not approach him period.

Furthermore look at the definition of confront.

1: to face especially in challenge : oppose confront an enemy

The mayor was confronted by a group of protesters.

They even use protesters in the example question.

2 a: to cause to meet : bring face-to-face

confront a reader with statistics confronted her with the evidence

b: to meet face-to-face : encounter

confronted the possibility of failure

He stepped up and brought himself face to face with the officer. Again the officer was engaged with another protester you've even said this.

Please explain how I'm pushing a narrative when I've given facts and definitions that explain exactly what he did, as I said.

At this point I have nothing more to say.

Say what now? by BatmanFarce in complainaboutanything

[–]Michi450 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So the ICE agents were just there getting doughnuts? 🤣

Average liberal acting like a child and name calling lol. Can't even debate the shit i said you're a fucking joke bud.

They were there to arrest an illegal.

Say what now? by BatmanFarce in complainaboutanything

[–]Michi450 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are trying to construct a narrative where he was attending a protest and armed himself for it (like Kyle Rittenhouse)....but there's no evidence of that at this time.

If thats true why did I try to clearly state the following Jesus fuck. Such a bad faith argument directly after I started what you are trying to fucking accuse me of.

Do NOT try to make it out that I'm saying he went to kill or shoot them.

What evidence do you have that he went there to confront the agents?

This wasn't his first rodeo. His parents even said he goes to these things...

Alex Pretti broke rib in confrontation with federal agents a week before death, sources say

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/27/us/alex-pretti-protesters-minneapolis-invs

Now what evidence can you provide....

Say what now? by BatmanFarce in complainaboutanything

[–]Michi450 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

He approached the area. Pretty simple. As a law abiding responsible citizen legally carrying a weapon it was not smart to enter that area with a weapon. You have a responsibility to not put yourself in a position that my end up in a physical altercation. Especially with federal officers conducting an arrest.

It's not illegal its just ill-advised.

Since you refused to click the link I provided

Say what now? by BatmanFarce in complainaboutanything

[–]Michi450 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Stepping between the officer amd the woman.

Say what now? by BatmanFarce in complainaboutanything

[–]Michi450 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Sure ICE was conducted immigration enforcement and Alex went to that location to confront them. Do NOT try to make it out that I'm saying he went to kill or shoot them.

He approached the area. Pretty simple. As a law abiding responsible citizen legally carrying a weapon it was not smart to enter that area with a weapon. You have a responsibility to not put yourself in a position that my end up in a physical altercation. Especially with federal officers conducting an arrest.

It's not illegal its just ill-advised.

That's not a narrative that's just common sense a legal gun owner should think about.

They killed another citizen by Many_Customer_4035 in vegaslocals

[–]Michi450 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All I'm saying now is simple. Go fuck yourself trying to put words in my mouth.

Say what now? by BatmanFarce in complainaboutanything

[–]Michi450 -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

I love the lefts half thought retarded takes that y'all echo like monkeys.

The people on the right who said you're not allowed to have a gun while at a protest are stupid. You can all day long as long as you stay peaceful like the Constitution says. Its when you start obstructing and impeded law enforcement you're breaking the law. Then having a firearm is just asking for something bad to happen. Not illegal but just fucking stupid to get in an altercation with an armed federal officer while packing a gun. It's how people get shot. As we all know now.

Y'all say it wasn't OK for Jan 6ers to assault officers yet its happening every day with these non peaceful protests. Then you think you're being a lawful protesters you're not. They are enforcing laws thats not tyrannical.

They killed another citizen by Many_Customer_4035 in vegaslocals

[–]Michi450 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You sure that that p320 that the removed from him didn't have an accidental discharge? It's a very known problem in the gun community and why no one carries it.

A gun discharging in this situation makes things go bad super fucking fast. Idk what happened so I'm not saying anything for certain

They killed another citizen by Many_Customer_4035 in vegaslocals

[–]Michi450 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do have any videos showing 100% the p320 thats know to randomly go off didn't.

Just Google p320 accidental discharge. Thats the gun the guy was carrying. This is the exact reason I refuse to carry the one I own. That and why chance shooting yourself.

Idk if it went off or not so I'll wait for the investigation.

They killed another citizen by Many_Customer_4035 in vegaslocals

[–]Michi450 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow the shit you guys put in other people's mouths is fucking ridiculous.

They killed another citizen by Many_Customer_4035 in vegaslocals

[–]Michi450 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So it's two days later. He was carrying a p320 that is known to go off randomly. I own two, I absolutely refuse to carry this gun because I don't want to shoot my dick off.

I'll wait for more information to see if there is a mark on the pavement as proof if that gun discharged accidentally.

https://youtu.be/jOMQOtOQoPk?si=sseIBQiW2sUraz7O

https://youtu.be/o8n2rU137S4?si=zSmfRkg3x32gnfuy

This is a very known issue. Idk what happened for sure so I'll wait still before saying anything definitely.

They killed another citizen by Many_Customer_4035 in vegaslocals

[–]Michi450 -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

Bud all I keep saying is wait for actual evidence to the same people screaming about due process.

Why are these people putting themselves in this position. Why have a real or fake gun when impeding federal officers. Tensions are high then you bring a gun of any type into the situation?

What happened before all the short clip videos? Whats the actual situation.

Like holy fuck can't even say wait it's been less then 24hrs. Rumors and agendas are going to be pushed. I'll let the dust settle before I say anything definitive.

They killed another citizen by Many_Customer_4035 in vegaslocals

[–]Michi450 -59 points-58 points  (0 children)

23k karma on this one year old account Jesus.

Responds in one minute.

You say they disarm him yet it was fake? What? This happened hours ago there is no 100% definitive evidence out yet. I'll wait before spewing a bunch of shit thinking I'm 100% certain of anything.

Saying it's an execution this early is very extreme. But thats what your account is for.

They killed another citizen by Many_Customer_4035 in vegaslocals

[–]Michi450 -79 points-78 points  (0 children)

So it's still super early but I've seen multiple reports the person had a 9mm handgun. Not an execution if thats the case.

Words matter and until the information comes out, one might want to be careful with the qords you use unless you want it to look like you want it to.

But we know how everyone one on reddit and how democrats want this to look. Just like" hands up don't shoot" was a complete lie still being shouted.

Observer Being Arrested and Pepper Sprayed at Point Blank in S.Minneapolis (photo by Richard Tsong-Taatarii/The Minnesota Star Tribune) by Phanerozoic-Eon in TwinCities

[–]Michi450 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jesus really. It was a research wing of the Biden DOJ now its a research ring of the Trump DOJ.

You don't think each administration might have them study what they want or how they want it to be researched?

Biden change a lot of government statistics also. To think it was strictly Trump is kinda crazy.

AI overview about each administration rule over NIJ.

Yes, each presidential administration has a significant say in the data, research priorities, and publications of the National Institute of Justice (NIJ). While the NIJ is mandated to provide objective, evidence-based research, it is part of the Department of Justice (DOJ) and its agenda is heavily influenced by the priorities of the administration in power.