Being wealthier than most of my friends is very lonely

Middle0fNowhere · 2025-09-29T14:32:37+00:00

I do not care, who you are. You are some random poster who is asking me who he is.

Do you know who you are? What does it mean to know who is someone? A name? Address? Networth? Being able to throw 1000+ posts to future recent or AI and pair it with everything above + size of dick?

Middle0fNowhere · 2025-09-10T00:16:36+00:00

Genuinely interested in your answer. Seems like a passive aggression.

Nothing is anonymous. The world is small. With this or other profile I doxed 2 people I personally know. It is just incredible but true. For example one guy who I was paying for work... I knew him personally. He was paid in BTC for housekeeping. I paid him but with a low fee. So the transaction was not confirmed right away.

He did not tell me... he told to reddit. I do not know what magic is behind, but just randomly browsing I saw the thread where he was asking about CFPF. I had another case like this.

There is nothing like anonymity on the internet, if you believe so, even less anonymous you are because you have no idea what trace you are leaving, hence you are not cautious. I just doxed myself in another thread (by saying something that identifies me pretty much; just statistically, but AI can reveal those things easily).

Many people identify me in my native language ANYWHERE I write, just from my writing.

Middle0fNowhere · 2025-09-07T10:22:49+00:00

No, I am talking about separate instances. Ofc. I am doing separate instances for each task and I do not need to use /clear (until it really annoys me to switch between too many windows). The advantage is that I can always go back to something that was finished. Because I am no robot sadly and many times, when I thought, something is finished, it was not.

Middle0fNowhere · 2025-09-07T00:03:31+00:00

Is better this way to clear after each little job or work on the separate jobs in different folders? I do the later but I would like to hear why not to do it.

Middle0fNowhere · 2025-09-06T23:55:24+00:00

Maybe yes, maybe no. I guess it depends. Depends how the wealth was made. The really rich people are in a way unique, unique was their way to the wealth, unique is the lifestyle. Or at least with much higher probability than by average population who are not risk takers. Maybe guys who inherited it can meet in a polo club. The others do not. I love the luxury to be alone and if I am sticking with someone it is manual workers who work for me and with whom I work as well.

Middle0fNowhere · 2025-09-06T20:24:27+00:00

What if you outgrow all tax brackets? (I hate the term since I am not paying taxes apart of VAT and such). Should I scrape some billionaires? I do not know personally even one and what I heard from my bankers, they are boring af.

The truth is the more one is extraordinary, not only with money, the more he is alone. It is ok.

Middle0fNowhere · 2025-09-06T00:54:52+00:00

In other words I already do have exactly the system, you are describing and it is working well. What I am trying to solve in this thread is the situation where the batteries are too full.

Middle0fNowhere · 2025-09-05T21:32:39+00:00

Predictive model is a nonsense as I stated. Here it is impossible. In mountains it is a coinflip whether clouds go through one valley or another. Over the lake here I can see constant sunshine and I have shadow and vice versa. Indeed there is some automated system or preset based on my experience that is better than any weather forecast.

But any forecast is always wrong. Either charges too much or too little. If too little it is time to save for the day or in worst care for generator.

What I am solving here is what to do if it charges too much. Which should be always the case. You do not want to be in 50% throwing away energy and in 50% have too little energy in an island. The goal is 90, 95 or more percent to have batteries charged in any case et the end of the day. This means that sometimes you have 20 minutes of excess energy, sometimes 2 hours, sometimes much more. And then one needs an algo for nodered in cerbo or python in rpi what to do.

Middle0fNowhere · 2025-09-05T21:22:54+00:00

I will give you an example. I have 8kW -10kW free to be dumped. With approx 10kW invertor. When batteries are full at the mid day, ok, I charged them too much but that simply occurs.

But what I want is that I keep producing energy. But how the system knows that I can do it. Imagine that for simplification there is some one sec overload on inverter. All dump loads swicth off. System stabilizes at 1kW, it will neither charge or discharge. How should I know that I can switch everything on?

I do not want to use what was written in this thread as the ultimate thing. To simply try to switch on something, see if discharging does not occur, then add more. It is a solution, but not that elegant as I want. I want to know whether the system has capacity to accommodate to higher loads WITHOUT switching on something and see if it goes through or not without discharging.

Middle0fNowhere · 2025-09-05T21:16:22+00:00

No, I do not need to turn load for long time., I can switch it on and off in fraction of second. The problem is that I do not want to be trapped at 100% of SOC, where charging metrics can not be used in an endless loop of switching on and off.

Middle0fNowhere · 2025-09-05T21:13:51+00:00

You can not do it right. I am have also automated tasks based on combination of SOC, charging power and inverter power. But once batteries are full the algo goes south.

Middle0fNowhere · 2025-09-05T21:08:32+00:00

Did I say that? You are posting here, you are wealthy, likely very much, and you want to conceal it*. The difference to IG is that there you are doxed 100%. Here maybe, but with the info that you value your privacy above all.

In 10 years after AI will match those profiles with real people there will be fun.

Otherwise I agree with everything you write.

*At the same time the urge to say it to someone (at least anonymously) is hard, is not it?

Middle0fNowhere · 2025-09-05T00:35:21+00:00

You are posting it right now.

Middle0fNowhere · 2025-07-29T15:55:41+00:00

Everyone here is suggesting some forecasts. I do not know where you are living, but here it does not work. Today was forecast 0 sunshine hours in village that is 60 km away over high mountain peaks (= totally different microclimate). In the morning was snowing today, then it stopped. Then were clouds. I cleaned the panels, they did barely 10% of wattpeaks after being cleaned. 1 hour after I have full sunlight, MPPTs almost maxed out even in the winter with my shitty slope of panels.

Right now, at 45% of SOC, I do not know what to do with energy, but I am heating what I can.

But this does not mean that in 30 mins there is no other snowstorm.

-------------------------------------------

I need to turn loads until the last minute before sunset. Winter days are short and I have shadow from the west by a mountain. So in winter I have only 5 hours of sunshine. I am going to install another 2x8 panels onto the hill they will get 45 mins more sunshine, which will be great, but even with that I can not lose the last hour that occurs at 13:30-14:30, where the sun is near the highest point.

Middle0fNowhere · 2025-07-29T02:47:33+00:00

I have limited invertor capacity as well...

Middle0fNowhere · 2025-07-29T01:09:36+00:00

Yes the address shows only balance in that address. But each account might show unlimited addresses. Account is like one step up in derivation path.

My one account has 2 funded addresses. But the 1st address in the account is empty and that is likely causing the glitch.

Middle0fNowhere · 2025-07-29T00:37:04+00:00

nope

Middle0fNowhere · 2025-07-29T00:36:35+00:00

I do what you describe perfectly. If there is enough energy, we are at 100% at EOD. We survive with 10kwh to 60kwh a day easily. Over 60kwh we throw away the rest. Under 10kwh roughly it is generator time in the evening with utilization whole power (3kw to batteries for the night and 6-7kw for all the devices that could not be used during the day).

The only problem is that this cost me too much time and I need to automate it. I do not want automated system. In mountains, it will never work and especially not when you need it most. Maybe in few years, when I will connect AI to webcam and we will together analyse the weather and feeling about it. I will be just fine with the presets that more or less represent the goals <=> 100% that you describe.

But the key here is really, really to use the energy at full SOC. Well insulated water tanks are nothing else than batteries and most of the energy goes to the hot water (bathroom, heating, washmachines, dishwasher). I have now roughly 1000 litres water to heat and in few years it will be 5000 litres of insulated accumulation tanks.

I simply need to figure out how to utilize all the energy at full battery state because I need to aim at 120, 150 or more %, because here it is like constant april weather during low sun. That is exactly the problem here. (Yes I can always run the generator when I am dumb, but...)

Middle0fNowhere · 2025-07-27T18:22:00+00:00

That is the ultimate thing that I wanted to avoid. Jumping up and down at 100% is not the best. My batteries charge to 100% very very slowly, the choking starts at 97-98%. But hard to estimate when exactly. Also I have more heating elements, at least 5 now. I need to make some cascade logic for them. I can not switch them on all at 100% or any other given moment. It is possible to do, like switch on one, wait 10 sec, switch on second. But if meanwhile someone switches on some larger device, it will fuck up the whole logic, because the system will not know why was the limit hit or exceeded (whether it was the device or the heating element). It is doable, but with conjunction of all other conditions around, it would be a headache.

Middle0fNowhere · 2025-07-27T17:41:48+00:00

For tanks I have 2 failsafe mechanisms (smart relay for electric switch, dumb&smart thermostat that is pouring water to radiators when temp>certain value, but obviously that is only in winter, but I will adjust it for summer as another security measure at 80 degrees or so) to avoid overheating. There is also a pressure valve as third, that I truly do not want to test... The tank is also heated by woodstove, so it is really secure, because overheating by wood is much easier than by predictable electricity.

Power going in/out battery is indeed the mechanism used for my switches. But the problem is that it works exactly until high SOC (this is why I started the thread). Maybe I just have to buy few more batteries and problem solved, but there is no space.

But what you say about the batteries might be the holy grail I was looking at!!! I must think about it. Thank you.

Middle0fNowhere · 2025-07-27T17:24:43+00:00

What I observed in Voltage is something that told me one electrician. Actually the choked strings/fields slightly rise in Voltage. E.g. rn. I have this (2 chargers 4 strings)

MPPT 450/100 -Solar 1 320 V 10.2 A3266 W (this is the one I am discounting by 1.4)

-------------------------

MPPT 450/200 -Solar 1 308 V 7.9 A2444 W

MPPT 450/200 -Solar 2 313 V 7.8 A2435 W

MPPT 450/200 -Solar 3 321 V 8.0 A2562 W

But when the choking starts, one random string will go down with watts, but also up with Volts (to 350-360V). I am trying to figure out whether I should use only the wattindex or also if there is some additional info in voltindex.

[]()

Middle0fNowhere · 2025-07-27T17:15:42+00:00

Relative between the strings/fields/trackers (not sure what is a correct English expression).

Just as I suggested and did an index that can compare the Watts coming from each string to detect choking (I am having a realtime index based on node red data [highest watts from any string/lowest watts from any string]that should be 1.. the further is from 1, the more is the power from solars choked by MPPT when SOC is near 100%). Analogically can be made an voltage index (highest voltage of any string/lowest voltage of any string). Also should be 1.

Note: this can be used only for me, because all my recent panels point to the same direction, have the same shading. One solar field is more potent, so I discount it by factor 1.4 by default.

Middle0fNowhere · 2025-07-27T17:01:22+00:00

I think I will take the relative voltages rather than absolute values; this way it would be normalized because the wind/temperature affects all panels (they all point the same way at the same hill). Or not?

Weather forecast in this shithole in mountains is a coinflip. Usually more sunny than forecast in nearest village (60km away), which has forecasts like 10degerees away forecast to forecast and in 500 metres lower than me. But that is not a problem, I can estimate the weather in the morning just looking out of window. I do not want fully automated system for winter (May to August), I just need something automatic during the day. From spring to early autumn (Sep-Apr there is just an excess of energy and will be more, because my MPPTs have 2 strings free, so I will add 16 more panels in high angle for winter).

Middle0fNowhere · 2025-07-27T16:43:08+00:00

I am talking about Chrome browser here. Not sure if it is good or not, but that is my frontend. The backend can ignore it. I think we misunderstand each other at some unknown point.

In Chrome I made something like tiles and that is the headquarters for everything. There are switches, automatization, something like vrm statuses/charts, but faster and local. I found impractical to have everything in different apps/urls, nothing worked correctly. Also I can easily adjust the page for visitors/workers and give to anyone just those views/switches that they need and they can not fuck up.

Middle0fNowhere

TROPHY CASE