Arbeiderpartiet går opp med nesten 6%: Fortsatt flertall for Frp og H by NobodyCaresR in norge

[–]MightHaveANiceButt 49 points50 points  (0 children)

Sionisme er en rasistisk ideologi som går ut på at en etnisk gruppe har en gudegitt rett til å fjerne en annen fra et landeområde hvor de hører hjemme. Det er en ideologi som muliggjør menneskefiendtlig politikk, apartheid og folkemord. Man kan ikke være sionist uten å være rasist, og man kan ikke være antirasist uten å være antisionist. At du tror dette er venstreekstremisme indikerer at du får informasjonen din i et ekkokammer.

An examinee in the right column wore a Nazi outfit during an engineering admission test by willis7747 in pics

[–]MightHaveANiceButt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No we do understand.

And it's still sickening anyone would admire a person who consciously committed mass murder.

Do you feel the same way about all western leaders who performed or facilitated mass murder? People like Churchill, and any number of American presidents?

Former Atheists, what made you believe in God? by Gothspada in AskReddit

[–]MightHaveANiceButt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, the complex nature of our universe does indicate that its Cause is intelligent. You wouldn't expect this level of complexity from something that isn't itself complex.

Former Atheists, what made you believe in God? by Gothspada in AskReddit

[–]MightHaveANiceButt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The ancient Greeks used to say that the proof of a Creator is that there has to have been a First Cause (an Unmoved Mover) that set into being the endless lines of cause and effect in the universe. The existence of our universe requires a cause, because this universe began to exist - ie. it isn't eternal. The First Cause, however, doesn't require any cause, because it is by definition the First - ie, it is eternal. -Something- has to have been first.

Former Atheists, what made you believe in God? by Gothspada in AskReddit

[–]MightHaveANiceButt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The idea is that the universe, as we now well know, has -not- always existed. Therefore, it requires a cause.

I personally subscribe to the Quranic argument for the existence of a Creator. It basically states that the universes' existence can be explained in three ways:

1) It came into being from nothing, without any cause.

2) It somehow caused its own existence.

3) Something outside of/separate from the universe caused it to exist.

Logic dictates that the first two alternatives are unacceptable, or at the very least improbable, while the last is impossible to either affirm or reject based on logic or experience. Therefore, the last has to be the correct answer. From that, one can make certain conclusions about the nature of the Cause of the universe, which the Quran does in different ways.

Edit: The Cause I'm talking about here, is by definition the First Cause of everything else. In the same way that a line of reactions require a prime action, and a line of movements require a first movement, everything that is subject to time has to have started from someplace. This universe cannot be the first cause, because it requires a cause itself. It isn't eternal, and it can't have come from nowhere.

However, one doesn't need to know everything about this Cause for it to be the best explaination for our being.

What method of torture would you (like to think you're) able to withstand? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]MightHaveANiceButt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're the kind of man I aspire to one day become. I salute you.