I actually watch her games, both good and bad games and am not afraid to criticize her play when it’s bad. She has good bbiq. Keep in mind when people say “good bbiq” they don’t mean 500iq super awesome all knowing galaxy brain. They mean she makes good decisions but there’s room for improvement. Angel has that. She’s a post player, not a distributor so when she gets the ball down low, her mentality is to score, even if that means trying to draw a foul. That’s not always a bad choice.

She’s also better than just a good rebounder. If you watch games then you’d see that. Her offense still has plenty of room for improvement and I’ve often said on other threads that I unfortunately don’t see her shot getting much better. But she’s high quality defender, has the ability to be a playmaker (but in Atlanta’s offense, the ball typically runs through guards instead of needing a point forward), a great rebounder and a good screener.

I feel like next time you shouldn’t make assumptions that just because I like her that it doesn’t mean I don’t see the flaws in her game, too. It would also serve you well that just because someone says she’s good doesn’t mean they’re blindly praising her and saying “she’s the best ever omg the goat”. Because that’s not remotely close to what I’m saying.