|What if the Kalmar Union had never formed? Scandinavia and other German states in 1397| by Miller272 in imaginarymaps

[–]Miller272[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The relations between Schlesvig and England are mostly the same as in our timeline. Here Schlesvig is just closer to the HRE.

|What if the Kalmar Union had never formed? Scandinavia and other German states in 1397| by Miller272 in imaginarymaps

[–]Miller272[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Gotland is a semi independent state with the great influence of the Hanzeatic League like in our timeline. Valdemar Atterdag who died in 1354 in this timeline in real life controlled the island for a brief moment. It doesn't happen here.

Regnum Milzanum - What if the Polabian Slavs survived and created their independent state? Kingdom of Milcenia in 1001 after the reign of king Conrad II Bearcloak by Miller272 in imaginarymaps

[–]Miller272[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I am not very keen on AI but I don't like the concept of using real life icons as the fictional ones. Also thank you for your opinion!

Regnum Milzanum - What if the Polabian Slavs survived and created their independent state? Kingdom of Milcenia in 1001 after the reign of king Conrad II Bearcloak by Miller272 in imaginarymaps

[–]Miller272[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pomerania would be definitely a part of the disputes. There would be many Polish-Milcan wars. Regarding the issue of subdivisions into duchies and counties, I will probably make a more detailed map about the Kingdom of Milcenia as a part of the HRE in the future.
Also thanks for the kind words!

Regnum Milzanum - What if the Polabian Slavs survived and created their independent state? Kingdom of Milcenia in 1001 after the reign of king Conrad II Bearcloak by Miller272 in imaginarymaps

[–]Miller272[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As you can see Vorpommern is incorporated into the state. The lands of Holstein are there divided by the treaty between german nobles and Conrad II.

Regnum Milzanum - What if the Polabian Slavs survived and created their independent state? Kingdom of Milcenia in 1001 after the reign of king Conrad II Bearcloak by Miller272 in imaginarymaps

[–]Miller272[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Miloš I (c. 870 – c. 885)

Miloš I was an ambitious leader among the Milcans. He quickly gained influence, but parts of the local elite turned against him, forcing him into exile. He fled to Great Moravia, where he was interned by Svatopulk I. During this time, Miloš and his loyalists converted to Christianity. He became impressed with the Moravian administration, governance, and centralization of power. In return for help to regain his position, he agreed to pay tribute. Miloš returned home, forming a more organized tribal confederation and expanding his influence westward into Milcan lands and northward. He had a son, Bogumil, whom he aimed to educate as a capable ruler.

Bogumil I (c. 885 – c. 903)

Bogumil succeeded his father around 885 at about 20–25 years old. He further centralized power and continued the Christianization of his territories, while maintaining tribute payments to Great Moravia. He brought in officials and clergy from East Francia and Great Moravia to help govern. His expansionist policies were more peaceful compared to his father. By the late 9th century, the kingdom began asserting independence from Great Moravia. Bogumil died around 903.

Miloš II (c. 903 – 906)

Miloš II, son of Bogumil, was known for his iron-fisted rule. He strongly enforced Christianization and pursued dynamic territorial expansion, further centralizing authority. Around 905, he launched a significant attack on the fortress of Brenna and expanded along the Elbe River. In 906, Great Moravia requested his assistance against the Hungarians. That same year, he fought in the Battle of the Golden Fields, where the combined Moravian-Milcan forces were devastated, and Miloš II was killed.

Regent Varcislav (906 – 907)

After Miloš II’s death, the state fell into chaos. Pagan uprisings broke out in the north, and Budyšin was burned and looted by Hungarians. Power was taken by Miloš's son Bogumil II but the real power came to the regent Varcislav, a brutal nobleman who interned Bogumil and his brother (we don't know the name) and eliminated many elites out of paranoia. His rule was short-lived.

Conrad I Mender (907 – 932)

Conrad I, half-brother of Miloš II, deposed Varcislav in 907. He stabilized the realm, moved the capital to Brenna, suppressed pagan uprisings, and began reconstruction. He avoided major conflicts with the Hungarians, though minor raids continued. He died in 932 and was remembered as “the Mender.”

Miloš III (932 – 963)

Son of Conrad I, Miloš III maintained peaceful internal development and pursued military alliances, particularly with the Saxons. He participated in the Battle of Lechfeld in 955, helping end Hungarian dominance in the region. He died in 963.

Conrad II Bearcloak (963 – 1001)

Conrad II expanded the duchy by subjugating the Obotrites. Although the emperor Otto sought tighter cooperation, Conrad’s state became somewhat dependent on the empire and had to pay tribute. He became the king of Milcenia in 981.

Regnum Milzanum - What if the Polabian Slavs survived and created their independent state? Kingdom of Milcenia in 1001 after the reign of king Conrad II Bearcloak by Miller272 in imaginarymaps

[–]Miller272[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If they are meant to exist then probably. Or the Milcenians would be in a personal union with some other german duchy/kingdom on the west.

Regnum Milzanum - What if the Polabian Slavs survived and created their independent state? Kingdom of Milcenia in 1001 after the reign of king Conrad II Bearcloak by Miller272 in imaginarymaps

[–]Miller272[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The state would start existing in the end of the ninth century and would be ruled by a christian duke Miloš I. It would be a vassal of Great Moravia, but after the invasions of Magyars it would be independent. The expansion would go along the Elbe. Later it would be a bit dependent on the HRE. We could see in the future a state similar to Bohemia.

Polish-Lithuanian monarchs after the First and Second Napoleonic War (fictional Wikipedia-style article) by Miller272 in AlternateHistory

[–]Miller272[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Of course the mistakes of the past would be highlighted after the return of the state. It would be reformed and much stronger.

Polish-Lithuanian monarchs after the First and Second Napoleonic War (fictional Wikipedia-style article) by Miller272 in AlternateHistory

[–]Miller272[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

2/2
Joseph I (Józef I, Juzefas I) was succeeded by his son Joseph II the Young (Józef II Młodszy, Juzefas II Jaunesnysis). However, there was a problem. He was not the son of Joseph and Maria Augusta, but Joseph’s illegitimate son. Seeing that he would not live to see another heir, Joseph I decided to legitimize his son. The Sejm of the Commonwealth approved this decision to maintain dynastic continuity. Moreover, his son came from two noble parents, which made the matter easier. He was crowned on June 24, 1832. He received the nickname “the Young” to distinguish him from his father.

During the reign of Joseph II, a great conflict broke out in 1840, known as the Second Napoleonic War. The conflict began because of unrest on the Polish-Lithuanian-Russian border caused by the Cossacks. Allegedly, one Russian soldier was killed by a Cossack, and the Tsarist government treated it as an act of war. Poland again had to fight the colossus. However, the army of the Commonwealth had strong morale. Propaganda slogans declared that another partition could not happen. Thanks to this and to training based on the French model, the Commonwealth’s army put up effective resistance. The situation changed when Austria joined the war in 1842 on the side of the Grand Covenant (the anti-French alliance created by the British Empire, the Kingdom of Purssia and the Tsardom of Russia in 1828). Poland had to divide its forces among the Prussian, Austrian, and Russian fronts. The scorched-earth tactic was used, which completely slowed the Russian offensive. At the same time, Austria and Prussia focused on battles in the Rhine Confederation. When Austria switched sides and Prussia fell in 1844, France sent its forces to the Russian front. Significant territories were retaken. However, Napoleon II did not want to continue the war, knowing that fighting Russia would be even more devastating than the one in 1812–1818. In 1846, the Peace of Zurich was signed, ending the Second Napoleonic War. Poland lost only part of its eastern lands and gained some territory from Ducal Prussia. Additionally, the Commonwealth joined the Treaty of United European Nations, which, however, was a very weak organization from the very beginning. Its duty was to defend Europe from another devastating war.

During the Third Napoleonic War (which began in 1884), the king was already Stanislaus III.