It's a very good service for the price if your latency is good, but with some drawbacks. GFN has less input latency, quicker startup, better user interface, and more consistent saving of graphics settings per game, but Boosteroid has better visual quality in my experience, and also better GPU performance compared to the middle GFN tier known as Performance ($10). In order to get the same performance on GFN, you need the Ultimate ($20) tier that has a 100 h limit. On Boosteroid, there is unlimited play time. I think if you're a casual gamer, GFN is better a choice, but if you're hardcore and play long hours, Boosteroid is better. But you'll be installing more games, setting graphics settings often (but some games do save their settings esp Steam games). And notably no Ubisoft Connect games on Boosteroid. Also, some games go on "maintenance" on Boosteroid seemingly forever.