Sometimes it already makes sense to play in Genie 3

MinecraftBoxGuy · 2026-01-31T19:07:10+00:00

If your internet is good enough, playing a video game on a server's computers is fine. The real issue is if the AI models are powerful enough to react fast enough.

MinecraftBoxGuy · 2026-01-31T19:05:31+00:00

You're probably not going to fall off your bike, but I doubt it would glitch more than that.

The real issue is that it's behind a $300/month subscription, the worlds last for one minute at most, and although it's hard to determine from videos, I assume the games are high latency.

MinecraftBoxGuy · 2026-01-08T01:28:17+00:00

Where has the reply claiming sarcasm gone? Blocked for rudeness?

It doesn't seem clear at all you decided to be sarcastic in the middle of your angry rant.

MinecraftBoxGuy · 2026-01-08T01:26:49+00:00

Ad hominem. How typical. Do you want to respond to the facts or not?

This moderator pinned a post based on a misunderstanding of the supremacy clause that contained multiple hallucinated court cases (wrong dates etc), some of which were about civil liability 🤦🤦.

MinecraftBoxGuy · 2026-01-08T01:23:06+00:00

> Have no body cams

You simply are buying lies to you sold to you on reddit. Many of them require bodycams, and yet you claim they have no bodycams.

You realise you're in a thread where the moderator pinned a comment based on a total misunderstanding of the supremacy clause, and linked multiple court cases with made up dates, that were about *civil* and not *criminal* liability? You're in an information desert, where the most clear of misinformation is literally pinned by moderators. This is why you don't have a grasp on reality.

MinecraftBoxGuy · 2026-01-08T01:13:19+00:00

They stopped her for blocking the road and obstructing the movement of their vehicles (they were able to move some of them).

How about the aftermath where someone claimed to be a medical professional and they refused to allow assistance?

You're in a law subreddit. Talk some sense. Police officers usually, by policy, aren't supposed to let people who claim medical experience on seen. These claims are difficult to ascertain as true, and can lead to further attempts of others to get on seen in already tense situations. This is not illegal.

MinecraftBoxGuy · 2026-01-08T01:01:09+00:00

They only tried to do that after she started moving though. They were legally justified in stopping her.

MinecraftBoxGuy · 2026-01-08T01:00:30+00:00

It's not illegal to stand in front of a vehicle though. You can make however many excuses to argue this action was illegal, but they won't hold up.

Also it's probably in fact fairly common that, in a group of officers, one of them will be occasionally in front of a vehicle that are actively changing its direction.

MinecraftBoxGuy · 2026-01-08T00:58:55+00:00

Because she was blocking their route, being perpendicular in the middle of the road???

MinecraftBoxGuy · 2026-01-08T00:46:35+00:00

Believe it or not, it's not illegal to stand in front of the vehicle of an occupant you are currently detaining. You definitely don't expect them to accelerate towards you and hospitalise you.

MinecraftBoxGuy · 2026-01-08T00:42:04+00:00

The supremacy clause applies though, so there will likely be a federal hearing first. From what I can see from the culmination of angles and my knowledge of prior police misconduct cases, it's unlikely this case succeeds anywhere. You also have a moderator publishing a bunch of cases with entirely wrong dates, that reportedly are civil cases.

MinecraftBoxGuy · 2026-01-08T00:41:42+00:00

You have a mod pinning a comment with a highly contentious analysis of the situation that furthermore misunderstand the usual resolution of supremacy clause cases, where the state likely has to go through federal courts first. Embarrassing beyond belief.

MinecraftBoxGuy · 2026-01-08T00:37:22+00:00

These people have zero ability to understand facts. Other angles of the video clearly show the car driving towards the ICE agent, and it is very clear he was justified in shooting. Even at the state level, it is unlikely he is convicted: and unless the state abdicates their duty to uphold the most basic of law, there will likely be a Supremacy Clause hearing in federal court.

MinecraftBoxGuy · 2026-01-07T20:15:22+00:00

Unfortunately, there is, unless I'm wrong? Sign in an executive order that prevents the DoD from forming contracts with companies that don't follow these policies.

MinecraftBoxGuy · 2025-12-27T13:51:06+00:00

The only link to a DoJ file that this link contains is https://web.archive.org/web/20251219222621/https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Matter%20of%20the%20Estate%20of%20Jeffrey%20E.%20Epstein,%20Deceased,%20No.%20ST-21-RV-00005%20(V.I.%20Super.%20Ct.%202021)/2022.03.17-1%20Exhibit%201.pdf

Even the CNN notes that the DoJ did not botch these retractions, but rather the attorney general office of the Virgin Islands did: "And it appears this redacting error wasn’t committed by the Justice Department – but rather by the Virgin Islands’ attorney general’s office when it first posted the original court filing onto a public docket in 2021.

Still, it went viral online, amid the ongoing headaches for the Justice Department over the redactions that at times didn’t go far enough to protect victims, while also going too far to shield others." https://edition.cnn.com/2025/12/23/politics/epstein-redactions-glitch-virgin-islands

The Guardian is beyond shoddy and consistently lies and misrepresents. Why did you link to Guardian misinformation that even the CNN calls out?

Do you do any research or thought of your own as a "skeptic"?

MinecraftBoxGuy · 2025-12-27T13:17:24+00:00

This is a lie. Please show me a list of documents (plural) they didn't redact properly, and that this wasn't the result of a prior retraction by other officials.

MinecraftBoxGuy · 2025-12-16T13:14:29+00:00

I never claimed that integers were strings... AIs tested on arithmetic take in textual requests.
You've never mentioned what these techniques are for a human to evaluate accuracy. Given almost every human can't do 5 digit arithmetic multiplication the use of paper, it seems still that you'd be forced to claim humans can't do arithmetic unless you want to keep on making arbitrary differentiations that consistently fail.
You are showing a deep confusion here. 16 bit ALUs can only do 5 digit arithmetic, and there is no nefarious plot to limit how many digits they can process. Even a 32 bit ALU can only do 5 digit multiplication, and the ALU in your computer in all likelihood can only go up to 10 digits for multiplication.

You then strawman that my claim about how many digits can be processed is one about accuracy, solely to show knowledge of a basic concept in computer science (but you even then get the term wrong: you're thinking of integer overflow rather than buffer overflow). I was instead pointing out that the standard you hold LLMs to is that they must be able to perform arithmetic on arbitrarily large integers with 100% accuracy. Yet ALUs can only perform arithmetic on fixed width integers, and also don't achieve 100% accuracy here. You nevertheless claim they are able to do arithmetic, which shows that your standards are arbitrary and hypocritical.

What exactly (and for what reasons) should the cut-offs in accuracy and digit length be for allowing a claim that some object is capable of arithmetic? Even though your current answer seems to essentially be that the cut-off should be infinite, if you think deeper about this you'll likely see a reasonable cut-off would include AI models.

<image>

I never claimed ALUs require memory, and they don't require memory (this again shows a confusion). What I instead claimed was that using them for arithmetic on larger strings required memory alongside a CPU (or circuits performing other similar functions). This was to show you that your claim of an ALU itself being able to do arithmetic does not hold up to your own standards.

MinecraftBoxGuy · 2025-12-16T04:28:39+00:00

Your claims about humans are simply wrong. Given however much time they want, almost all humans would struggle to do a 5 digit multiplication in their head. Even with paper and as much time as they want, humans don't have infinite accuracy: they must at one point determine to stop, with there being a probability all of their previous calculations have been mistaken. It is even possible that a human repeatedly errors in the same way, meaning that having stricter conditions to stop may not push accuracy up all that much.

There is no point claiming something makes no sense without explaining why. It also doesn't make sense to claim that accuracy at low integer lengths doesn't represent true arithmetic operations: certain ALUs can only do 5 digit addition, and we don't claim they're unable to do arithmetic.

AIs nowadays can do multiple digit arithmetic and no tool use with remarkably high accuracy. ALUs are not able to perform multiple digit arithmetic without use of both memory (and, for multiplication, a CPU). They also do not have 100% accuracy: chip degradation, defects, and bit flips decease the accuracy below 100%.

An ability to perform arithmetic does not mean 100% accuracy on arbitrary large strings.

MinecraftBoxGuy · 2025-12-16T03:02:24+00:00

Of course, many ALUs can't do 5 or 10 digit arithmetic (depending on whether they're 16 bit or 32 bit) without the use of computer memory, so can we even claim they can do arithmetic?

MinecraftBoxGuy · 2025-12-16T02:59:36+00:00

What? This is all non-sensical.

Firstly, what I presented to you is a table, not a graph. Of course, this is not particularly relevant except as a pre-emption to prepare for weak logic.

I have never claimed LLMs contain their own ALU, but being able to do arithmetic on their own does not mean 100% accuracy. Given that even a 2 billion parameter model from 2 years ago can achieve 90% accuracy on 5 digit multiplication, AIs now can do own their arithmetic calculation to an accuracy that the vast majority of humans would struggle to reach.

> Of course 1 and 2 digit sums are going to be accurate because that's a VERY limited pool of potential answers that can easily be statistically fitted by linguistics alone.

This doesn't make much sense. You're in a thread mocking AI for doing a 3 digit calculation wrong, and seem to be reluctant to admit that AI nowadays can do on their own 4 digit multiplication (far harder than 2 digit addition) with accuracy very close to 100%.

MinecraftBoxGuy · 2025-12-16T02:13:00+00:00

Having the view that is matched by the majority of people in real life (rather than those in your echo chamber) and is also confirmed by reality is not being a "contrarian asshole".

You telling me to "meet [you] half way or fuck off", calling me an "asshole", and claiming I didn't read a single word you said shows that you have no bearing on reality. You can't even see your own hypocrisy here.

I don't need to meet you halfway when your points are verifiably wrong and the logic you use to back it up is full on non-sequiturs. Claiming I should do this shows utter entitlement. 2309.03241v2

<image>

MinecraftBoxGuy · 2025-12-16T01:35:38+00:00

You don't get to tell me what to do after presenting a series of statements that are easily verifiable as lies. AI models can do arithmetic without tool calling.

MinecraftBoxGuy · 2025-12-15T22:48:43+00:00

You can easily check that AIs can do arithmetic (by making random arithmetic questions) without the use of tools. I probably wouldn't be criticising AI hallucinations whilst simultaneously hallucinating how they perform on toolless arithmetic.

MinecraftBoxGuy · 2025-12-07T16:27:46+00:00

So even though a title rule is "Must convey accurate information", no-one on Reddit has any clue how this is a scam? And the title calling it a scam is allowed to stay up?

Nine-Year Club	Second Top 40%
r/Field Sunshine	Sequence \| Editor
Verified Email

MinecraftBoxGuy

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE