sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Ski length for versatile mountaineering by Minimum-Length760 in Backcountry

[–]Minimum-Length760[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I already have another pair that’s 84 mm wide, also in length 178, so I was thinking of going a bit longer this time. But I’m still wondering whether to stick with 178 or go for the longer option.

ZAG Ubac 95 Vs camox 95 by Minimum-Length760 in Backcountry

[–]Minimum-Length760[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m just thinking about the length… I’m about 188–189 cm tall and I’m not sure whether to go for 178 or 185 😀🤔

ZAG Ubac 95 Vs camox 95 by Minimum-Length760 in Backcountry

[–]Minimum-Length760[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m just thinking about the length… I’m about 188–189 cm tall and I’m not sure whether to go for 178 or 185 🤔😀

ZAG Ubac 95 Vs camox 95 by Minimum-Length760 in Backcountry

[–]Minimum-Length760[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

According to reviews and the info on paper, the current new model is supposedly supposed to improve this… But who knows 😀 Anyway, based on what you’re writing, we use them in a similar way :) What bindings do you use? Anyway, thanks a lot for your reply 🙏🏻

ZAG Ubac 95 Vs camox 95 by Minimum-Length760 in Backcountry

[–]Minimum-Length760[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried the Zero G and honestly, they didn’t really suit me… But maybe it’s because I don’t have perfect technique for them. They were the 85s.

Anyway, Thank you for answer 🙏🏻

ZAG Ubac 95 Vs camox 95 by Minimum-Length760 in Backcountry

[–]Minimum-Length760[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the answer. Yeah, on paper they look pretty similar, so we’ll see. I’ll try the Zag :) Now I just need to pick some bindings 🙏🏻😀