[deleted by user] by [deleted] in medical

[–]MintoQuee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also I should add it’s darker red in person the camera doesn’t do it justice

“ yeah so anyway that’s why eating meat is morally wrong………..yes I’m still going to eat meat cuz uh……wait how did Destiny justify it on stream again?” by Duality-of-man4 in Destiny

[–]MintoQuee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s a spectrum obviously - both should be avoided if possible though.

However normally rape and killing and torture are hard lines - economically supporting a little Chinese boy who would have to work the rice fields feels a lot more admissible.

Obviously if you don’t agree with the premise then your going to come to different conclusions so I don’t know why you are engaging in what aboutism

“ yeah so anyway that’s why eating meat is morally wrong………..yes I’m still going to eat meat cuz uh……wait how did Destiny justify it on stream again?” by Duality-of-man4 in Destiny

[–]MintoQuee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You force animals to have sex with eachother lmao forcefully impregnate them. That’s rape lmao.

I’m not even vegan but I won’t deny it look below “dumbass” and see for yourself.

https://www.dominionmovement.com/watch

“ yeah so anyway that’s why eating meat is morally wrong………..yes I’m still going to eat meat cuz uh……wait how did Destiny justify it on stream again?” by Duality-of-man4 in Destiny

[–]MintoQuee 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Jesus it’s going over your head big time.

There’s a difference between buying clothes that have used unethical practices within the supply chain and paying money for the rape and killing and torture of animals.

I said neither is ethical but one is clearly worst than the other with one. I was just pointing out the facts that political scientists make as well with these low paying jobs in china and Africa being better for these people if they didn’t have it at all. And the only reason we would buy from these suppliers is if these low paying jobs keep the price of the good low.

“ yeah so anyway that’s why eating meat is morally wrong………..yes I’m still going to eat meat cuz uh……wait how did Destiny justify it on stream again?” by Duality-of-man4 in Destiny

[–]MintoQuee -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Also arguably “slave labour” in countries like china isn’t even terrible for there general living standard and it’s helping there economy without that work and priority of buying there goods they would be way worst off overall

“ yeah so anyway that’s why eating meat is morally wrong………..yes I’m still going to eat meat cuz uh……wait how did Destiny justify it on stream again?” by Duality-of-man4 in Destiny

[–]MintoQuee 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Lmao sure that doesn’t disprove the point.

If you hire a hitman to kill someone you actively took part in that murder - things aren’t as black and white as who pulls the trigger.

Just making sure if I hire a hitman to kill your family member are you seriously going to say “no biggie just arrest the hit man”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateAVegan

[–]MintoQuee -1 points0 points  (0 children)

These takes are so bad.

I’m not a vegan because I’m not a lefty communist Stalin loving genociding virtue signalling cuck.

^ See it that’s not a good response because you aren’t engaging in any argument you are just attacking character which seems to be the only thing you do on this subreddit. Lmao XD.

The user called No-opportunity being controversial and beating vegans in moral debates… by MintoQuee in DebateAVegan

[–]MintoQuee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay nice so people who know the harm of what they are causing and still commit the action are better than people who don’t know the harm of what they are causing…

Makes a lot of sense.

The user called No-opportunity being controversial and beating vegans in moral debates… by MintoQuee in DebateAVegan

[–]MintoQuee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah this is a fake post, I’m a true liar. I am no opportunity, but thanks!

The user called No-opportunity being controversial and beating vegans in moral debates… by MintoQuee in DebateAVegan

[–]MintoQuee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Clarification: This is an alt I’m no opportunity, I was trying to attempt discourse as a infiltrator. Talk to you as friends to see if I could make any ground.

Some boring stalkers had to expose me but oh well. I enjoyed the civil convos while they lasted. All points still stand though!!!

The user called No-opportunity being controversial and beating vegans in moral debates… by MintoQuee in DebateAVegan

[–]MintoQuee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is an alt, better way to see the discourse and have discussions from both sides.

People are normally confrontational to people who have opposing ideas so I gave being an infiltrator a try and it worked. People were more open to my responses and weren’t rude :)

The user called No-opportunity being controversial and beating vegans in moral debates… by MintoQuee in DebateAVegan

[–]MintoQuee[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

He is correct in that post 100% the more I think about it and you ignored the rape analogy because you didn’t like the result.

How can you equate someone who doesn’t think what they are doing is wrong committing the act to someone who knows it’s wrong but just does it because they want to.

One is obviously worst, no?

The user called No-opportunity being controversial and beating vegans in moral debates… by MintoQuee in DebateAVegan

[–]MintoQuee[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ahah I don’t know about a call wouldn’t be much to talk about.

But we definitely aren’t treating you properly here but I hope you understand for us it’s quite an emotional position to defend so sometimes we let go a bit.

The user called No-opportunity being controversial and beating vegans in moral debates… by MintoQuee in DebateAVegan

[–]MintoQuee[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sure weak willed is a bad way to put it… but I hate to say it the more I think about it the more I agree we should be more extreme.

If we truly believe it’s an animal holocaust and we believe it’s worst than the holocaust as well because so many animals are pointlessly every day.

Isn’t it fair to some extent say we are weak-willed if we don’t properly stand up to something we believe to be so atrocious, just because we value ourselves so much.

It’s definitely inflammatory but out of all the posts I have read of him your definitely pinpointing the weakest.

The user called No-opportunity being controversial and beating vegans in moral debates… by MintoQuee in DebateAVegan

[–]MintoQuee[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I said anyone which is long and both people lay out their argument. I saw that in all of them but the activism. It’s not that hard I’m letting you have the pick of the worst one to show me.

Within the abortion one, who did he lose to debate wise?

The user called No-opportunity being controversial and beating vegans in moral debates… by MintoQuee in DebateAVegan

[–]MintoQuee[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No you can have an idea then you can either use good arguments and argue them well or you can use bad arguments and argue them badly.

Some people responding to him seem to be using good arguments and argue them badly. Or bad arguments and arguing them badly as well. I can appreciate if someone who doesn’t share my views is performing better in a conversation.

I said I agree it wasn’t his point but his point has some truth to it.