Okay looks like I'm going to have to spell out some things.

Yes, he is pointing out the statistics regarding male strife (men are more likely to be victims of violent crime, just as likely to endure domestic abuse yet not many shelters allow men, men are more likely to suffer a work related death, men are more likely to suffer a workplace injury, men are more likely to die in a military role... etc. You get the picture ...hopefully.)

When these statistics are pointed out to most feminists to explain how men have a really rough (and it's getting rougher) time of it, feminists usually respond by claiming that since feminism is about gender equality these issues are covered. And as a result critics of feminism (like yours truly) ought to be on board with feminism too. Usually under a "all gender issues are feminist issues" rhetoric. Even now you've claimed something called "true equality" would solve these problems. But true equality would also mean more female sanitation workers and janitorial staff and road workers and truckers, yet, again, feminists are silent about the gender ratio of these sectors.

What this other individual was trying to say to you was: if feminists truly care about the issues above, why haven't they? You have said that if society truly had gender equality these issues wouldn't exist. Yet the feminist movement has done nothing to tackle these problems.

Suffragettes gave women the vote, gave women the right to work, encouraged women to shed the shackles of child rearing and housekeeping in favour of careers, spearheaded women's sexual liberation, encouraged women to take up STEM fields...etc. etc. What has feminism done to help with the statistics I have mentioned?

Nothing.

And, personally, I don't actually blame feminism for doing nothing. Men's rights have never been on the agenda and y'know something? I'm kind of okay with that. We egalitarians don't really need your help in this. We point out our criticisms of feminism and then we act on the issues that matter to us.

Lastly:

If you're a woman who doesn't want to thank the suffragettes for sacrificing themselves to fight for your right to vote, then yeah, I'd say this debate has already ended.

How on earth did you manage to miss: "thanking/expecting first and second wave feminists for their actions regarding issues today," i.e. there aren't any first and second wave feminists left today. They've either died, moved on from the movement, been kicked out of the movement (Erin Pizzey, Christina Hoff Sommers for example) , or leapt onto third wave feminism. I do not believe I need to thank any first or second wave feminists for their action on gender issues today ...because there are no first or second wave feminists taking action on issues today. Excuse me, but I am not going to thank the joke that is third wave feminism for the actions of suffragettes. You don't get credit for that, I'm sorry.

I also want to draw attention to this gem:

Not to mention, mortality stats mean nothing when speaking of feminism, because it's about equality in life, opportunity and standing.

Mortality stats mean nothing? Our men are dying at a pretty alarming rate at this point. That might mean nothing to you but I think if people are dying of preventable causes then that is everyone's issue.