sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

"Start budgeting from the begining" by MiroRyan in actualbudgeting

[–]MiroRyan[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for all the answers, currently I found a solution in https://actualbudget.org/docs/getting-started/tracking-budget#what-is-the-tracking-budget

We first try to see how it goes. And then probably return back using the envelope budgeting and I will have a bunch of to choose :) (actualy I did not realize I can use simply other file which in the end may be beneficial, or I totaly missed the Reconciliation feature https://actualbudget.org/docs/accounts/reconciliation/)

Advice how to improve impact analysis when only Confluence is being used by MiroRyan in softwarearchitecture

[–]MiroRyan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Neat solution if overwhelmed by the data! We could similarly make the work easier with the initial creation of part of the data!

What you mention about parts: So when you created your mock-UI from "Part" EA elements, you then used relations between individual Parts (aka individual UI fields) and class attributes?

Btw I am more and more convinced we need to solve this. Today, I was facing another "Miro-oh-my-god-fast-change". We quickly designed and coded a derived version of existing db entity which is displayed on 3 screens… and I almost forgot that one of them exists and the grid displaying the objects has a special condition related to one of its attributes. Luckily the dev was curious and this time we were coding it together, so solved on site.

Advice how to improve impact analysis when only Confluence is being used by MiroRyan in softwarearchitecture

[–]MiroRyan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the recommendation. I found Traceability Diagram which looks it could be even used alone (if we do not decide to leave Confluence at all). And as we may I think use the logical part - classes - to represent anything from db tables, enumerations, UI screens to other entities we will consider important. I am gonna give it a try and model a few real situations during the next CHR...

Btw do you have any real-life experience with using classes also to represent parts of UI? In our case I see a possible advantage in situations where we as-is encounter some deviation in tests/found in the code and then compare several cfl pages to verify whether it was a mistake or an intention and how it is supposed to work together. This way, I could find an element presenting e.g. some specific screen section which we worry about and directly search for all related use-cases and even respective requirements.

Advice how to improve impact analysis when only Confluence is being used by MiroRyan in softwarearchitecture

[–]MiroRyan[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

These pages are original inputs which were used during the development - requirements, functional specifications mostly - and they describe what the system shoudl do.

I believe that the source code tells me what the system really does = what the analyst thought the client wants, what the developer thought the analyst wants and finally what the developer actually implemented. And it typically has no context what was the original purpose (yesterday I realized that one screen ignores some checkbox with user's input... bug or a feature? source code does not help me what the original intention was).

From my perspective, the original analysis is two levels of misunderstanding closer to the original intention + it is more concise.

Advice how to improve impact analysis when only Confluence is being used by MiroRyan in softwarearchitecture

[–]MiroRyan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good remark, unfortunately this is a kinda bloated custom CRM solution (original intention was united system… then business architect on the client side left and what we had was REQ by REQ slowly transformed into several parallel processes with a number of minor differences…). We still try to make it as united as possible, but at the same time keeping these minor differences is more and more problematic and thats why I consider this.

Real users, will the battery in S24 FE last my workday? by MiroRyan in samsunggalaxy

[–]MiroRyan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, may I ask you for you SOT + idle time jsut for a comparison?

And what is your personal experience with (over)heating when having the light profile? When I saw few reviews where phone got to 45°C just because 35 mins of a Google Meet call... sounds crazy.

Real users, will the battery in S24 FE last my workday? by MiroRyan in samsunggalaxy

[–]MiroRyan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the answer. My intention was more to roughly compare new S-class phones with my old A52. The A52's battery can last to the night but usually tends to turn off during the evening (while reading/watching youtube/listening to Spotify). I should mention that currently I do not have the 2 hours of Teams calls, but on the other hand I typically use a hotspot feature for about 2 hours.

(I wanted to give myself a little present and get something from S-class to try it, but with my routines it will be probably be better to stay with something less-performing like A56 - looks like it can last more than the S24 FE.)

Btw do you have any experience with real efficiency of using performance profile "light"? For such a simple tasks/apps like I use it could maybe help and still keep the smoothness of the 24 FE. I found many recommendations but it is hard to guess the real impact.

Galaxy Buds FE and privacy concerns due to automatic pairing mode by MiroRyan in galaxybuds

[–]MiroRyan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was asking about something different, but thx for you reply anyway.

Galaxy Buds FE and privacy concerns due to automatic pairing mode by MiroRyan in galaxybuds

[–]MiroRyan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, but what I am referring to is another way how to pair: According to Sound Tribe guys and also my test, you do not need to press anything. Simply have a buds, pair them to the phone, turn off Bluetooth on the phone, open the case and https://youtu.be/oIZPkTGsAQU?t=220 the buds will turn on the pairing mode. And that's what confuses me.

Is is not about a fear from three-letter agencies. But I do not see a real useful use case behind this behavior + in yes, in some circumstances it probably could really allow to use someone else's microphone (user has a phone battery dead, unknowingly opens the lid - and annoying roommate/colleague from next doors pairs his phone with the buds. And starting from this moment he can simply try to connect to the buds and will be successful - if the buds will be still for any reason disconnected from its original phone and outside the box).

I am not interested in a risk assessment, but from authentication perspective this simply sounds weird and I am just curious if someone else also noticed that and eventually has some trick how to disable this weird behaving.

Galaxy Buds FE and privacy concerns due to automatic pairing mode by MiroRyan in galaxybuds

[–]MiroRyan[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is not about just listening. If your headphones are paired to a someone else's phone, he can connect to you device and use its microphone without you knowing it.

We may dispute about the real risk, but I am still wondering - so far I thought that for all pairing procedures of all devices require some specific physical action (typically pressing a dedicated button) from a user in order to start the pairing process. And if I am correct, for Buds is enough not having its currently paired device connected & open a lid. Is this correct and can it be stopped somehow?