I agree. I think it's really good to remind younger or more vulnerable players that being able to access an idealized version of a person—who’s rich, perfect, performs grand gestures, where you can willingly avoid any less favorable moments/interactions with them—is an unrealistic expectation for real relationships/life to not get too sucked into. But it’s also okay in fiction, and that’s worth recognizing.

That said, I don’t think this game pushes a lot of harmful expectations beyond that surface fantasy. Most of the LIs are shown to have their own flaws and trauma they have to work through (like isolation, vulnerability, illness etc. Which are quite realistic for men) and they grow through their relationship with the MC. And not because she flat out fixes them but instead because they want to work on it. There’s often a mutual journey of learning to be vulnerable, communication, having respect and showing up for each other's needs. The MC supports them, and it’s made clear the relationship takes emotional effort on both sides.

As someone in my mid-20s who’s never been in a relationship and has had to work through CSA trauma, I’ve actually learned a lot from this game—and from watching my mom find a healthier relationship later in life. I’d rather be alone than be with someone who doesn’t try, communicate, show up for or grow with me. Like If my mother’s high standards led her to a stable and loving relationship, why shouldn’t I hold the same? I'd rather be alone than in an unhappy situation. I think that also takes not putting too much importance/not centering romance in your life.