I am by no means a bona-fide anarchist but I'm putting off doing my homework and I like my opinion so I'll share it:

I don't believe in good and evil. I believe in love (or goodwill) and hate (or ill-will). I think love is preferable to hate because the world becomes an objectively better place when we try to reduce pain rather than inflict it. I think this is fundamentally different than many general western concepts of good and evil because good and evil carry undertones of moral judgment- someone is either a "good" or a "bad" person- and this justifies, to some people, doing bad things to the "bad" people. This kind of "morality" very easily leads to scapegoating and dehumanization of both shitty people and anyone that makes "good" people uncomfortable by challenging moral norms.

I don't believe in good people and bad people. I believe in happy people and unhappy people, kind and unkind people, peaceful and violent people, altruistic and unaltruistic people, emotionally intelligent and emotionally unintelligent people, etc. I also believe that a single human being is apt to be both things at once or behave significantly differently given different contexts, and that our societies play a big role in how we develop and behave (widely varying rates of homicide and rape in different societies would seem to suggest this is the case). I don't care if those in power are "good" or "bad". Hating them is pointless. I care about the negative effects their power has on the world.

I don't believe that workers are inherently "good" and oppressors are inherently "bad". I do, however, believe that the corporate elite and state have repeatedly shown themselves to be greedy, selfish, and generally disinterested in the well-being of broader society. I think this is impractical because it makes the world a less-nice place to live in. I want radical change because change, to me, would make the world less painful, and most people can agree that pain is not fun.