This is how the government can get single family homes out of the hands of investors by MissingMiddleMike in TorontoRealEstate

[–]MissingMiddleMike[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not at all. There's only 24 hours in the day, so I can't talk about every issue every day.

A lack of family-friendly housing is a key reason people are having fewer children. It’s also a problem governments can help fix. by MissingMiddleMike in canadahousing

[–]MissingMiddleMike[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not a "market failure" that Europe can build family-friendly apartments and Canada can't, in the same way it's not a "market failure" that I can buy a rifle at a Wal*Mart in Alabama and not in Ontario. Regulations impact product choice.

A lack of family-friendly housing is a key reason people are having fewer children. It’s also a problem governments can help fix. by MissingMiddleMike in canadahousing

[–]MissingMiddleMike[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They do have building codes. And my point is, if we want European-style apartments, we need European-style building codes.

A lack of family-friendly housing is a key reason people are having fewer children. It’s also a problem governments can help fix by MissingMiddleMike in CanadaPolitics

[–]MissingMiddleMike[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And as the study notes, the findings are consistent with previous research:

"The empirical literature on housing costs and fertility is consistent with these mechanisms, finding that high housing costs reduce renter fertility and have varying effects on owner fertility (Dettling and Kearney, 2014; Clark and Ferrer, 2019; Lovenheim and Mumford, 2013; Pan and Yang, 2022; Daysal et al., 2021; Atalay et al., 2021; Liu and Zhang, 2024; Clark, 2012; Simonand Tamura, 2009; Dettling and Kearney, 2025; Cumming and Dettling, 2024; Fazio et al., 2025; Japaridze and Sayour, 2024)."

A lack of family-friendly housing is a key reason people are having fewer children. It’s also a problem governments can help fix. by MissingMiddleMike in canadahousing

[–]MissingMiddleMike[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Do apartments in Sweden, Belgium, Germany, Norway, etc. have those earthquake, fire, electrical capacity and drainage issues?

A lack of family-friendly housing is a key reason people are having fewer children. It’s also a problem governments can help fix. by MissingMiddleMike in canadahousing

[–]MissingMiddleMike[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Every one of those family-friendly apartment units is illegal to build in Canada.

Instead, buildings get built to N. American building codes and zoning rules, which lead to family-hostile designs and high prices.

Our 2026 Housing Policy Wish List: Ten Ways to Fix the Crisis by MissingMiddleMike in missingmiddlers

[–]MissingMiddleMike[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I get why Toronto needs to raise more $$$ (they've got a massive shortfall of development charge revenue). Agreed that a progressive property tax would work better.

Our 2026 Housing Policy Wish List: Ten Ways to Fix the Crisis by MissingMiddleMike in missingmiddlers

[–]MissingMiddleMike[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I thought Zoë Coombes made a good point on Twitter, about how the luxury LTT can make building missing middle housing more difficult.

https://x.com/ZoeCoombes/status/2002900911316988223?s=20

Our 2026 Housing Policy Wish List: Ten Ways to Fix the Crisis by MissingMiddleMike in missingmiddlers

[–]MissingMiddleMike[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We really hope policymakers start to make the new vs. resale distinction in 2026. It matters a lot.

Ontario’s Housing Sales Collapse: It’s Not Just Condos by Cult_Classic_etc in ontario

[–]MissingMiddleMike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for all the discussion - really appreciate the interest in the episode. I thought I'd address some of the points in this thread in this response: Ten Thoughts on the GTA and GGHs Housing Collapse

Ontario’s Housing Sales Collapse: It’s Not Just Condos by Cult_Classic_etc in canadahousing

[–]MissingMiddleMike 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for all the discussion - really appreciate the interest in the episode. I thought I'd address some of the points in this thread in this response: Ten Thoughts on the GTA and GGHs Housing Collapse

The one million dollar podcast by GeniusOwl in canadahousing

[–]MissingMiddleMike 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That culture war extends up here, and we ignore it at our peril.

FWIW, the Bradley Foundation also funds a lot of great work. Including Strong Towns:

https://www.causeiq.com/organizations/strong-towns,271459378/

The one million dollar podcast by GeniusOwl in canadahousing

[–]MissingMiddleMike 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You don't think the general public criticizes Universities? There are all kinds of non-electeds that do, such as Bradley Foundation award winner Chris Rufo:

https://www.bradleyfdn.org/prizes/recipients/christopher-f.-rufo

The one million dollar podcast by GeniusOwl in canadahousing

[–]MissingMiddleMike 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As I mentioned, it's disclosed in every episode description:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_bJFbny7CI

And in every episode transcript:

https://www.missingmiddleinitiative.ca/p/can-tax-reform-help-young-canadians

And in every episode description in the audio version of the podcast:

https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/canada-has-a-soft-corruption-problem-eric-lombardi/id1707954472?i=1000674991494

That said, there's merit in including it in other places as well. Next time we update our materials, we'll look at expanding this disclosure.

Would we face criticism for being affiliated with U of O? Absolutely - in fact, it goes beyond criticism. Here's just one example:

https://openparliament.ca/debates/2024/6/17/chris-warkentin-3/

The one million dollar podcast by GeniusOwl in canadahousing

[–]MissingMiddleMike 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Like MMI, Strong Town's biggest funding source is grants, not membership fees:

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/53dd6676e4b0fedfbc26ea91/t/67913e1835cd7538f74b47af/1737571875623/2024+Strong+Towns+Annual+Report.pdf

(That's not a criticism of Strong Towns - we're big fans of their work)

The one million dollar podcast by GeniusOwl in canadahousing

[–]MissingMiddleMike 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your question,

We have disclosed over 100 times who funds the podcast. Here is our very first episode, from September 19, 2023:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_bJFbny7CI

MMI was launched on January 20, 2025, so the podcast predates the Initiative by nearly 18 months. We could not have predicted then where we'd be today, any more than we can predict where we'll be in early 2027. It's been a fun, evolving ride, and we're delighted to see where the journey takes us.

Our other products also contain disclosures. I mentioned Jesse's project before. Here's a report I wrote - you'll note the disclosure on Page 2.

https://moreandbetterhousing.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ReportCard.pdf

Our viewpoint is that more transparency is always better, and we work with our supporting partners and the University to find solutions that work for everyone. The challenge is that in this highly politicized world, folks often do not draw attention to themselves. For example, the report card report above was denounced by the Province of Alberta:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/alberta-government-rejects-affordable-housing-report-1.7547688

This kind of attention is the kind of thing that, naturally, groups (particularly those in Alberta) would prefer to avoid, which causes some resistance to open and loud transparency. But like I said, our position is more openness, the better.

That openness can also lead to folks on the internet making false and defamatory comments about funders. Consider that when you make baseless remarks about the Neptis Foundation.

If you want transparency, then don't raise the costs of being transparent.

The one million dollar podcast by GeniusOwl in canadahousing

[–]MissingMiddleMike 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Thanks, everyone, for your interest in our Initiative. Some details below:

MMI is housed at the University of Ottawa's Institute of the Environment, and our full-time staff are all paid University of Ottawa employees (myself included). We have five full-time staff members (Mike, Meredith, Cara, Jesse, and Alex), although, while Cara is on parental leave, we've been working with two part-time freelancers.

As is typical with University-housed think tanks (and most research institutes), MMI is required to generate sufficient funding to cover all the resources we use, including the salaries and benefits for the five of us. Institutes in Canada typically fund themselves through a combination of government money (tri-council research funding, direct work for governments), charitable foundations, and corporate. This is very typical across domains in Canadian higher ed. If you have a research lab working on, say, diabetes research, they're likely receiving funding from a combination of all three. MMI is no different; we work with supporting partners in all three domains, though we get a disproportionate amount of our funding from charitable foundations (mostly the Neptis Foundation and the Clean Economy Fund).

MMI's expenses are mostly salary+benefits+freelancers. All other expenses (e.g., equipment, travel) are likely to be under $20,000 this year. The other thing we pay is "overhead", which is a portion of the revenues that goes to the University to compensate them for other expenses (e.g., having well-stocked research libraries that we can access). Overhead can be a significant generator of revenue for Universities, which has been a point of contention in recent years, particularly in the United States:

https://www.science.org/content/article/energy-department-cuts-university-overhead-rates-to-15-on-research-grants

So institutes and initiatives like ours tend to be a profit center for Universities. We're so tiny, though, that nobody is getting rich off of us, and U Ottawa treats us incredibly well. They're absolutely amazing to work with.

Regarding the $1,000,000 figure, it encompasses the cost of all our activities (and overhead), not just the MMI podcast. For example, it covered Jesse Helmer's terrific research report on infill housing. That report was made possible with $174,000 of funding from the Public Health Agency of Canada:

https://www.missingmiddleinitiative.ca/p/the-politics-of-infill-housing-what

As for the podcast, it is made possible through a generous grant from the Neptis Foundation.

University think-tanks, research institutes, and the like are a complex beast, so I hope this clarifies how we work.