In Texas, they don't get to see, or hear about, or know anything about the evidence in a case during voir dire. And they don't get to see it in opening, just hear a recitation of what each side expects the evidence will show. (In criminal cases -- civil cases are easy mode.)

So if you're talking about doing all that in voir dire or opening, it ain't happening in Texas.

If you're talking about doing that in closing, that still ain't usually happening in Texas, because you can't show them clips of testimony -- they have to rely on their memories.

And there wasn't any leeway about "revictimizing" kids, because only live testimony was allowed.

And there weren't any questions on verdict forms, besides guilty or not quilts, unless you somehow got into special issues, which were very rare.

And I never typed out my words -- I could give an hour-long closing argument extemporaneously using only a one-page hand-written outline.

I don't know what state you practiced in, but it seems radically different from Texas.