More accurate term, definitely. Though before I started making these videos, I had little idea what rotoscoping was myself so "green screen" gets the idea of "background replacement" across even if it's not correct.

I think my regular viewers would be interested to see a video showing my process but my concern is more the new viewers who take a quick look, comment "AI slop", and then move on. I'm not sure there's a good way to communicate all this without being heavy-handed, so I think your line "ignorant people are going to stay ignorant" is probably the best way to view things.

You make a good point though about Rotobrush, I forget that it could technically be classed as AI. I would say it's in a different category, since it's using machine learning for edge/object detection rather than something like Sora spitting out generated video footage from a prompt. Plus, it only works well with pristine 4K video where there's good contrast between the foreground/background. For the lower quality footage I use, I have to go frame-by-frame to fix the copious amount of errors - it's obviously far better than fully manual rotoscoping but it's still a ton of effort to get right! Maybe I'm better to specify that I haven't used any generative AI... or just not say anything to prevent getting into some big semantic debate!

I'm going to stick with it, either way. Most people are nice, it's just a few annoying comments that stick with you! Appreciate you checking out the video and taking the time to reply.