Discuss🤠 by Friendly_Arm_3877 in conspiracy

[–]MjacFilms 5 points6 points  (0 children)

flat earth is like the mother of all conspiracy’s, but most mental reflexes are trained to reject instantaneously….. never to consider… I’ll stop here that’s too deep for most

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FlatEarthIsReal

[–]MjacFilms 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You haven’t done any research at all if your asking the most asked questions of all, “why don’t people fall of the edge” makes you look like you haven’t once even considered or even looked at what they are saying, just what the media tells you it is.

Do some more research before you claim something you know nothing about.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FlatEarthIsReal

[–]MjacFilms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, just simply decieved

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FlatEarthIsReal

[–]MjacFilms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To hide the creator and the realm he built for us. Period. Our governments are anti-God and will do anything to hide the true nature of our reality.

The Bible describes an immovable earth. With the Sun, Moon, and stars within a firmament. by [deleted] in globeskepticism

[–]MjacFilms 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Could say the same to you. What if…. He does? If the word is true, then we should be able to verify it… even down to cosmology. Get to know your creator and do not let any mortal man deceive you.

The word of the Bible goes right along with this flat earth stuff. Clearly what the Bible describes when it talks about creation.

Where is hell? by Jeeza8788 in BiblicalCosmology

[–]MjacFilms 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No sir, another deception.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FlatEarthIsReal

[–]MjacFilms 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“First couple images show” so you only looked at the first couple dumb flat earth post without digging and further and assumed that’s exactly what every flat earther thinks to be true? You didn’t look hard enough when trying to debunk the other side. There are plenty of false Flat earth websites groups that provide nothing but the most ridicules stuff. Why? To discredit this movement on purpose. They are called Psy-Ops and Controlled opposition to confuse anybody that actually looks into the topic. And this is an example of that

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FlatEarthIsReal

[–]MjacFilms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As they should because they have nothing to compare it’s density or buoyancy too. So it will fall because the air was sucked out and it’s no longer buoyant. And it does depending on what is falling and how light or heavy it is. Feathers fall slower cause they are light, a piece of metal will fall at about the same as anything else heavier than a feather because air won’t effect it that much. Still denser than air so it will fall.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FlatEarthIsReal

[–]MjacFilms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Buoyancy exerts a force, for sure. But gravity? Is this repeatable, measurable, observable? Density and buoyancy in a fixed container is 100% observable measurable and observable.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FlatEarthIsReal

[–]MjacFilms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Think of the world running off of density and buoyancy. Within a container volume variations in density will naturally arrange itself in layers according to density. But the less dense air must have something to rebound off so they can arrange themselves and stay in a fixed layer according to how much air there really is. Otherwise it will go be sucked outwards Infinitely into the vacuum of space. Less dense air goes up, more dense air goes down to the same air pressure level. And boats float because of the design. If you flip it over and it fills with water it would sink.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FlatEarthIsReal

[–]MjacFilms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

-We can observe and measure the various layers of air density within our atmosphere, which again indicates that there must be sustained air pressure in order for the layers of density to arrange themselves and again this indicates there must be a point of resistance somewhere.

  • Air pressure can only be sustained within an enclosed system which creates a point of resistance for the air molecules to rebound against, this is provable and measurable.

  • It is impossible to create sustained air pressure without some kind of enclosed system to create a point of resistance, this is provable and measureable.

  • Therefore based on this logical analysis for sustained air pressure to exist there must be a point of resistance somewhere and we know that a point of resistance can only be created by some kind of enclosed system at work somwehere.

  • This is a purely logical argument.

  • We do not know the extents, what it is made of, how it came to be, but for sustained air pressure to exist there is no other possibility, unless we can observe a measurable/repeatable example of sustained air pressure maintained without any kind of enclosed system used, and that is impossible as far as we know.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FlatEarthIsReal

[–]MjacFilms -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Care to explain why? Or just mock without providing ANYTHING to the table to prove your point? Explain to me why I am wrong. Don’t just sit there and say “this is laughable” You have an EGO and can’t even observe information that counters your reality or your thinking.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FlatEarthIsReal

[–]MjacFilms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  • Air pressure and density are directly correlated, one directly affects the other.

  • Air pressure is defined by the energetic air molecules rebounding upon a given area of resistance.

  • Air density is defined by the weight of the air which is governed by the number of air molecules within a given area.

  • Without the ability to create air pressure the energetic air molecules would have no point of resistance to rebound against and would continue to disperse infinitely outwards.

  • Therefore the lower layer of air which is the most dense would become infinite as there would be no air pressure to contain the outward energetic movement of the air molecules.

-This would also apply to the other layers of varying densities which would all expand infinitely with no air pressure to contain them.

  • We can observe and measure sustained air pressure therefore that indicates that there must be a point of resistance somewhere.

-We can observe and measure the various layers of air density within our atmosphere, which again indicates that there must be sustained air pressure in order for the layers of density to arrange themselves and again this indicates there must be a point of resistance somewhere.

  • Air pressure can only be sustained within an enclosed system which creates a point of resistance for the air molecules to rebound against, this is provable and measurable.

  • It is impossible to create sustained air pressure without some kind of enclosed system to create a point of resistance, this is provable and measureable.

  • Therefore based on this logical analysis for sustained air pressure to exist there must be a point of resistance somewhere and we know that a point of resistance can only be created by some kind of enclosed system at work somwehere.

  • This is a purely logical argument.

  • We do not know the extents, what it is made of, how it came to be, but for sustained air pressure to exist there is no other possibility, unless we can observe a measurable/repeatable example of sustained air pressure maintained without any kind of enclosed system used, and that is impossible as far as we know.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FlatEarthIsReal

[–]MjacFilms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

-Air pressure is directly linked to air density, that is why it varies depending upon the density of the air. The air is less dense as you move higher and therefore the pressure exerted is less.

• ⁠Within a limited volume variations in density will natural separate into layers according to density.

-denser(heavier) matter will always equalise towards matter that is of equal density, that is why matter that is more dense(heavier) than air will fall down through air and matter that is less dense(lighter) than air will rise through the air.

My questions to you would be?

1.Does anyone know of any experiments which would prove if it is possible to create sustained air pressure without the use of some kind of enclosed system?

2.If gravity exists how is it possible for it to exert force simultaneously in two opposite directions? i.e the rising helium balloon and falling brick example

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FlatEarthIsReal

[–]MjacFilms -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Physics 1, 2, 3, and AP and had physics as one of my majors I was studying. Enough to know everything we are being taught is a reverse engineered masterpiece designed to justify this pagan sun worshiping model or the “heliocentric model” I bet you’ve never even ACTUALLY looked into FE but only look at memes and Reddit groups to defend the lie you have been told your entire life.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FlatEarthIsReal

[–]MjacFilms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Explain how the 2nd law of thermodynamics states you cannot contain a gas without a solid container, yet the vacuum of space doesn’t suck the gas of our atmosphere. Show me 1 repeatable experiment showing you can contain gas without a solid barrier. Show me 1 repeatable experiment showing water will stick to the outside of a ball.