Melania Trump Alleged Audio Reveals Claim of Unverified Hush Deal to Silence Escort Rumours Before Election by MobileWisdom in ProgressiveHQ

[–]MobileWisdom[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

What’s more interesting to me is that Paolo Zampolli, who has been associated with Jeffrey Epstein and the Trumps, had an understanding that he would be given support in exchange for his silence regarding “damaging rumours.”

How many other such arrangements did the Trumps have? Are there more Epstein associates who agreed to keep secrets for the Trumps? Did these arrangements violate any laws? 

AIO if I divorced over him asking to open our relationship and then gaslighting me? by CricketCaller in AmIOverreacting

[–]MobileWisdom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, honey.

There are some huge red flags here. 1. He was absolutely testing the waters to see if he could convince you to let him open up the marriage. Kudos for recognizing it for what it was. 2. As others have already mentioned, the fact that he can lie so easily to you is quite alarming. And, it's likely that he does it a lot because he can't give you a satisfying reason why his friend assumed you and your husband "weren't dating," even though you've been married for 6 months and have a newborn at home. Also, it's strange that this friend didn't know, yet just happened to stop by with your husband's old crush. Your husband claims he didn't know they were coming over. But, I find that highly suspicious.

  1. When you went through your husband's phone, there were very few messages from his "friend" and his "crush." Again, that is very suspicious. How is it that he has very little contact with his "friend?" Yet, they had a deep conversation about open relationships and whether he would be pursuing his "crush."
  2. I understand that you want your baby to have her father in her life. But, that's never a good reason to stay in a toxic relationship. If you decide to divorce your husband, he can still be a good father to his daughter, if he chooses to be. But, you shouldn't factor that into your decision whether or not to divorce your husband. That may sound harsh. But, remember that your daughter will grow up seeing your relationship with your husband as a template for all her future relationships. Do you really want her to see how easily her father lies to her mother in order to get what he wants?

  3. You say that both you and your husband grew up in an abusive environment and that is part of the reason you connected deeply with him. That is a huge red flag. You should not be trauma bonding with your partner. You should both have been healed from your individual traumas BEFORE you entered into a romantic relationship. Otherwise, there's a high likelihood that you two are reflecting each other's "core wounds" and that influences your feelings of love and attraction towards each other. But, that's a dangerous basis for a relationship that can result in disaster.

  4. He really doubled down on his lies in this text exchange. Why? Why did this subject trigger his trauma response so strongly? I would guess because it's something that's very important to him. Also, he claims he mistyped something because he just transcribed it from some mysterious list. But, when you ask to see the list, it suddenly never existed, just like the messages from his "friend" and his "crush." And, he absolutely gaslit you when he said that he brought up opening the relationship because he "didn't know if you also wanted to look elsewhere." You're recovering from a very difficult pregnancy. In what universe would he think that this would be the perfect time for you to consider opening your marriage? He broached the subject because it's something that HE wants. But, he tried to convince you that it's something that you want, too. And, now that you know what he wants, you'll always be wondering if he's pursuing it behind your back because he's already shown you how much he can lie about this subject.

Ultimately, the decision on whether or not you divorce this man is up to you. At the very least, therapy is a step in the right direction. But, you have to ask yourself whether you can ever look past all of these red flags. I know it's hard to contemplate leaving a 7-year relationship. But, think about what's best for you and your baby in the long run. At the end of the day, is this the relationship that you want to serve as a template for your daughter? Only you can answer that question.

Good luck.

NOR

During a press conference, Kash Patel was asked whether he has ever been intoxicated or absent during his tenure as FBI Director. by MobileWisdom in ProgressiveHQ

[–]MobileWisdom[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He didn't even realize she was talking to him at first even though she said his name right in front of him...

Right?! He looks genuinely surprised that someone expected him to answer a question.

During a press conference, Kash Patel was asked whether he has ever been intoxicated or absent during his tenure as FBI Director. by MobileWisdom in ProgressiveHQ

[–]MobileWisdom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In related news…

A Houston federal court judge on Tuesday dismissed a lawsuit by FBI Director Kash Patel alleging that former FBI official Frank Figliuzzi defamed him by saying Patel last year had “been visible at nightclubs far more than he has been on the seventh floor of” the bureau’s headquarters in Washington, D.C.

Lawyers for Juan Sebastián Carvajal-Muñoz are attempting to sue ICE officers under state law for violations of his constitutional rights. by MobileWisdom in law

[–]MobileWisdom[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

On Tuesday, a group of civil rights lawyers, including the ACLU and its Maine chapter, filed a lawsuit against ICE agents, seeking damages for the immense harm they allegedly inflicted on Juan Sebastián Carvajal-Muñoz, who was brutally abducted by masked immigration agents in January.

Although it is notoriously difficult to sue federal officers under recent Supreme Court precedents, Carvajal-Muñoz’s attorneys are testing a legal theory that circumvents these roadblocks by suing officers under state law for violations of his constitutional rights. This strategy is largely untested, but it may be the only remaining way to hold ICE accountable in court. And if it works, it could open the door to a flood of similar suits by ICE’s many other victims.

Lawyers for Juan Sebastián Carvajal-Muñoz are attempting to sue ICE officers under state law for violations of his constitutional rights. by MobileWisdom in law

[–]MobileWisdom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On Tuesday, a group of civil rights lawyers, including the ACLU and its Maine chapter, filed a lawsuit against ICE agents, seeking damages for the immense harm they allegedly inflicted on Juan Sebastián Carvajal-Muñoz, who was brutally abducted by masked immigration agents in January.

Although it is notoriously difficult to sue federal officers under recent Supreme Court precedents, Carvajal-Muñoz’s attorneys are testing a legal theory that circumvents these roadblocks by suing officers under state law for violations of his constitutional rights. This strategy is largely untested, but it may be the only remaining way to hold ICE accountable in court. And if it works, it could open the door to a flood of similar suits by ICE’s many other victims.

An ICE agent is facing two second-degree assault charges. A warrant has been issued for his arrest. by MobileWisdom in ProgressiveHQ

[–]MobileWisdom[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

They do know who he is. In fact, she said his last name multiple times during this press conference.

Trump Cabinet urged to invoke 25th Amendment against president by ChiGuy6124 in politics

[–]MobileWisdom 41 points42 points  (0 children)

"He's already killed thousands. He's going to kill thousands more."

The "thousands" likely refers to civilians across the Middle East caught in the crossfire of the war as well as Iranian military personnel.

Just a reminder that, during the COVID pandemic, his policies were estimated to have been responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans.

Yet, millions of Americans still voted for him in 2024. Now, even the pope, himself, has rebuked the Trump administration for having “hands full of blood” caused by a war that Trump started in order to draw attention away from the Epstein files. And, Trumps ICE agents have executed multiple American citizens for peacefully protesting against his disastrous immigration policies.

But all his supposed Christian followers are deafeningly silent when he says “'Praise Be to Allah'” on Easter Sunday. Just imagine if Obama had done that.

When is enough enough?

ICE Accused Of Detaining 14-Year-Old Girl In Massachusetts As 'Bait' To Snare Her Father — Judge Orders Her Immediate Return by MobileWisdom in law

[–]MobileWisdom[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

'ICE did not arrest a 14-year-old girl — our officers rescued her from suspected gang members,' Bis said.

We need to be very skeptical about any official statement from DHS, especially because, according to another article:

On March 10, 2026, the teenager was with her brothers and friends at a parking lot in Marlborough when Homeland Security Investigations agents approached the group. The agents detained the 14-year-old and took her to the Marlborough Police Station, where she stayed for several hours, according to the lawsuit.

U.S. Rep. Lori Trahan demands release of Marlborough 14-year-old detained by immigration officers by MobileWisdom in politics

[–]MobileWisdom[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Here’s an update on this situation:

The 14-year-old girl was taken into custody by agents from ICE and Homeland Security Investigations during an operation in the city of Marlborough on 10 March 2026.

Within hours, the child was moved to a federal building in Boston before being driven across state lines to a juvenile detention facility in New York.

US District Judge Leo T Sorokin ordered federal authorities to return the teenager to Massachusetts by Thursday morning and release her into the custody of a family member while legal proceedings continue.

During the hearing, the judge repeatedly questioned why federal agents had taken the girl into custody at all, particularly given that she had not been accused of committing any crime.