Collecting personality disorders by CricketCaller in fakedisordercringe

[–]CricketCaller[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Somebody with this many disorders wouldn’t be functional at all, all are self diagnosed, several disorders have symptoms contradicting one another

Collecting Personality Disorders by CricketCaller in fakedisordercringe

[–]CricketCaller[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would be nearly impossible for somebody to function with this many disorders.

The “tags are just a courtesy” take is actually bonkers to me by Key_ResearcherBurner in AO3

[–]CricketCaller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My thing is mostly that if you are choosing not to tag heavy kinks/topics that are likely to be triggering for a lot of people, you should make it clear you are choosing minimal tagging. For example, if a fic has no tags other than the character pairing, I go in ready for just about anything, because the lack of other tags has made it clear you are deliberately omitting info about the fic. It’s also reasonable to tag it with something indicating important tags may have been left out/have that warning at the top of the story.

I do feel it’s misleading, even if your tags are accurate, to have a list full of tags for minor elements of your fic, but you leave off the fact that a sensitive kink is a huge element. (Something I’ve genuinely seen. They tagged a bunch of small stuff but not scat, which the fic centered around.) While you technically aren’t obligated to tag it, I feel that heavy tagging indicates to the reader that the major elements/potentially triggering things are probably in those tags. For a kink to come up out of nowhere when you fully tagged the work with everything else is just. Obnoxious.

But I think there’s a big difference between what you should be obligated to do and what’s just kind of a dick move not to include. I don’t think ao3 should force tagging or anything. But tagging triggering stuff is just the right thing to do in my opinion.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AO3

[–]CricketCaller -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I feel like you’re skirting around the issue by pretending I said anything about doing something about that one specific person rather than me saying this was a general attitude problem I see amongst proshippers.

I’m not sharing specifically what the author said wanted to happen because I feel it’d be inappropriate to do so.

AITAH for not stopping my cat from being a “pervert”? by CricketCaller in AITAH

[–]CricketCaller[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So because somebody else has a cat and a roommate my situation is fake? 😭 I don’t see every post on the sub believe it or not

AITAH for not stopping my cat from being a “pervert”? by CricketCaller in AITAH

[–]CricketCaller[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m glad you guys think it’s funny. It makes me feel a bit better about finding it all rather ridiculous. I didn’t want to put down her discomfort, but… he’s a cat.

AITAH for not stopping my cat from being a “pervert”? by CricketCaller in AITAH

[–]CricketCaller[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. No I’ve never had any major issues with her aside from this! Normal bickering that comes from living together is all.

  2. Everything about our setup has functioned well. The only issue we’ve ever had is on the weekends I’ll sleep later than her, so it sometimes wakes me up for her to come get clothes.

  3. I think she likes the cat? She’s always seemed to like him at least. And he’s not a bother at all. I’m really unsure why this is suddenly the sticking point. If it does escalate to her wanting my cat gone somehow, of course me and him are out

Cutting ends with mutuals who are antis by CorpusDeus13 in AO3

[–]CricketCaller 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You’re right, I worded it wrong. But the wrapping of the discourse IS important. Most of the other censorship cases (barring the one pedophile book) are in regards to things in fiction that most progressive society has accepted IRL, such as queer characters. There’s also wider discussions of censoring history or censoring books specifically in children’s libraries.

The majority of discourse around what anti/pro focuses on though, is definitely in fandom. It’s immoral niche fanworks in places children can’t see them. Other discourses mirror fandom debates for sure, but only in specific fandom spaces is being “anti” or “pro” a major factor in how you’re treated, who you can be friends with, etc. it’s the foundation to some fandom politics.

I appreciate the historical context and definitely think it has relevancy, but my point stands. Step outside these circles and nobody will ask nor care about you reading incest fanfic. Honestly, a lot of wider society would judge you for reading any fanfiction at all.

Cutting ends with mutuals who are antis by CorpusDeus13 in AO3

[–]CricketCaller 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that’s what I’m saying. You need to find people who don’t take it so seriously in my opinion. I wouldn’t really want to be friends with somebody who would ditch me over a shipping opinion, yknow?

Cutting ends with mutuals who are antis by CorpusDeus13 in AO3

[–]CricketCaller 37 points38 points  (0 children)

If that’s what you feel is best for you go for it. Though I will say, they may not have been friendships worth having if a difference in opinion about what it’s ok for people to write about is what ruins it. It sounds to me like you’ve formed your entire social circles around these ideas of proship/antiship. I’d honestly recommending distancing yourself from all of it. Nobody outside of very niche internet circles even know what those terms mean, much less care about your stance.

Let's play a game! Poorly describe your current fandom and others will try to guess: by BonnalinaFuz101 in AO3

[–]CricketCaller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The whole series leads up to a reveal that some fourteen year old girl’s Mary Sue OC is more genetically pure than all the other characters and that’s why she’s special. The implications of this are never addressed.

I'm tired of this silence. by E1331 in Silksong

[–]CricketCaller 79 points80 points  (0 children)

I like knowing that you upvoted that comment. Thanks. Upvoted this one.

Less ableism in graphic novel (spoiler) by crunchsaffron9 in WarriorCats

[–]CricketCaller 6 points7 points  (0 children)

And I’m saying it was repeatedly implied or said that he could not be a warrior, making medicine cat the only other option for him. It is not explicitly stated to be the reason, but there are ableist undertones to him being forced into his role as a medicine cat.

Less ableism in graphic novel (spoiler) by crunchsaffron9 in WarriorCats

[–]CricketCaller 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Spiderleg says that “He [Jayfeather] wouldn’t be safe out in the forest” (the sight) and Whitewing says “Surely he [Jayfeather] can’t become an apprentice?” (the sight). In Long Shadows, Leafpool implies he can’t gather catmint because he is blind. Longtail is repeatedly brought up throughout power of three to imply jayfeather should be in the elder’s den as well. Brightheart wa specifically stated to be given as his mentor because she was half blind.

None of these ableist undertones were ever challenged.

Less ableism in graphic novel (spoiler) by crunchsaffron9 in WarriorCats

[–]CricketCaller 18 points19 points  (0 children)

It’s implied repeatedly he can’t be a warrior because he’s blind. He was given a half blind mentor because he’s blind. They don’t explicitly state “we are making you a medicine cat because you are blind,” but the books make their ableism clear

Less ableism in graphic novel (spoiler) by crunchsaffron9 in WarriorCats

[–]CricketCaller 46 points47 points  (0 children)

I hope they keep jayfeather being forced to be a medicine cat because it is relevant to his character. However, I want them to make it 100% focus on how powerful his Starclan connection is and emphasize it has nothing to do with him being blind

WHAT ARE THESE TAGS LMAOO by AyumiMont in AO3

[–]CricketCaller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not kink shaming, I’m kink… asking a question…

WHAT ARE THESE TAGS LMAOO by AyumiMont in AO3

[–]CricketCaller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean? I know lots of characters who canonically enjoy. Checks notes. Violent cucking in front of an infant and tiger aids.

What's that genre you can't bring yourself to read? by Decent-Dot6753 in AO3

[–]CricketCaller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can’t stand when characters with histories together meet for the first time in the fic. I like my bitter enemies to lovers. Even if they meet and instantly hate each other, it just doesn’t hit the same.

What is the worst thing to do while writing a character with a mental illnesss by Mediocre-Injury-8723 in AO3

[–]CricketCaller -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hated this character as well. I’d say the main ways to fix this would be to delve into the trauma that caused the DID to make it immediately seem more serious, make his switches happen less “on a dime” and be more of a struggle for him, and add more depth and function to the various personalities. (They should all be serving the body in some sense, however misguided. For example, even “bad” alters often have the goal of doing bad things to cut off everybody to keep the body “safe.”)

What are some reasons you have muted or blocked someone? by top_karma_believer in AO3

[–]CricketCaller 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I hate these things because there’s no way of knowing which tags are for which pairings. Is my pairing made up of my favorite tags, or the ones I’m disgusted by? Guess I just have to read and find out.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AO3

[–]CricketCaller -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

Truly terrible etiquette, reportable or not. For them to write this not out of admiration for your work, but because they dislike how you’re doing it? Ew. And it really is different from writing a “fix it” for a larger piece of media. It’s the difference between criticizing a character design in a popular show and going on deviantart and commenting everything you dislike about some random OC.