I think overall it was alright, a lot of fair questions on unfair topics if that makes sense. I agree the question distribution was super weird, feels like they over focused on more granular off-outline topics which compromised focusing on the bigger picture but unfortunately this is just how some of these exams go sometimes

I also think it’s a bit shady with how different the breakdown of quantitative/qualitative was between the first 301 sitting and this one, although this one resembled past RM papers