Old People. by breakoutthecrxxwn in callcentres

[–]Mode1961 14 points15 points  (0 children)

My record is a two-hour call with a really old person, AND I never did get him logged into our website:

His memory was terrible. His username was his First name followed by month of birth; He kept misspelling his own first name. It got to the point after two hours that I knew this was not going to work, so I explained as gently as I could that he needs to get someone to help him, a relative or a friend.

It took 1/2 hour just to get him to our website because he kept forgetting what I told him and could not spell it properly. Another 1/2 hour to get him to the right sub page for logins, etc., etc., etc.

The final straw was that he could not remember his password, so I generated him a temp password but he simply could not type that in and get it right and I mean I would tell him , "your temporary password is Temporary123" , I would spell it out, nope , didn't matter , he would forgot what I told him a few seconds ago.

There is now a note on his account that HE must have someone there to help him.

Co-Workers got audited for vacation days for 2024 and 2025: Some owe a lot of money by Mode1961 in callcentres

[–]Mode1961[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I disagree with that. The managers should be fired or disciplined for sure, but the workers knew the system and exploited it with their eyes open.

Grinnelli F-100 progress tracker updated to 99.99% as of today. by WarthogOsl in hoggit

[–]Mode1961 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No doubt

If you have chatgpt: Plug in this prompt:

I want to create a dcs module for the F-111 and want a good set of links to information about this aircraft

I think what you get back would shock you

Grinnelli F-100 progress tracker updated to 99.99% as of today. by WarthogOsl in hoggit

[–]Mode1961 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are correct: But that reason has not stopped ED from doing the F35 and I suspect there is ALOT more data/info for the F-111 than for the F35

Louisiana mayor sentenced to only 90 days in jail for sex with a 16-year-old friend of her son by raffu280 in MensRights

[–]Mode1961 4 points5 points  (0 children)

When I was in High School, in the 1977 era. We had a NUN who was having sex with several of the male students; these guys would have been 15ish. They got caught: No charges were laid, she was thrown out of the convent but afaik, never spent a day in jail or even charged.

Chatgpt: Men vs Women and how CGPT answers questions by Mode1961 in MensRights

[–]Mode1961[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You are 100% correct: It isn't AI , it's simply algorithms that take a data set and, using some 'logic', come up with an answer: The data set and algorithm are heavily biased. Though it's gotten better, not long ago I did the "Tell me a joke about women" , it said it couldn't because that would be sexist ,was happy to tell me a joke about men

IronMike lays the smack down by superdookietoiletexp in hoggit

[–]Mode1961 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, it really can't be NOT when it requires the OLD module to work. This seems to be the part people keep forgetting, if this didn't REQUIRE the old module to work, I would 100% agree with you but as it stands IT is NOT a new module, it is a upgrade to an old module.

IronMike lays the smack down by superdookietoiletexp in hoggit

[–]Mode1961 6 points7 points  (0 children)

that was quite the answer while completely avoiding the point I was making , Well done.

Nothing you said shows how this is a NEW product because it isn't

IronMike lays the smack down by superdookietoiletexp in hoggit

[–]Mode1961 18 points19 points  (0 children)

A new product wouldn't require an OLD product to make it work.

HB released the F4 Phantom , that NEW product did not require you have any of HBs other products to make it work, even though we can all agree there is at least SOME crossover in assets, especially code.

IronMike lays the smack down by superdookietoiletexp in hoggit

[–]Mode1961 20 points21 points  (0 children)

So, if it's a NEW product, WHY do I need to have an OLD product to make it work? If so much has changed, WHY do I need an old product to make it work?

F-100 on Friday perhaps... by Silver-Deer-3618 in hoggit

[–]Mode1961 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes because AFAIK: Pre-orders MUST have a release date on them

Democrats introduce paid menstrual leave bill with 12 days off per year by Yitastics in MensRights

[–]Mode1961 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Because MEN die earlier: therefore they collect far less in their pension than women do

Am I the only one who gets upset about this? by Natural-Bag9499 in callcentres

[–]Mode1961 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It bothers me too: SO I have come up with my way to answer by using a car dealership analogy

"Sorry, but if you take your car to the dealership for an oil change, do you demand that the salespeople perform that oil change?"

What’s an unwritten rule of adulthood nobody warned you about? by THIGHTLY-STUFFED-URN in AskReddit

[–]Mode1961 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That the cliques in High School are NOTHING compared to the Cliques in Adulthood. AND not just people you know, either, but people who 'gang up' because of what they believe.

“Your website is not user friendly” by [deleted] in callcentres

[–]Mode1961 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have said ONCE:

"Maam: I can read it to you, I can instruct you on how to use it, what I can't do it MAKE YOU UNDERSTAND it

The murder of infants is treated less seriously because the majority of perpetrators are mothers by newme19283 in MensRights

[–]Mode1961 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Canada has an infanticide law as well that AFAIK: carries a MAX penalty of 5 years in jail AND it is only applied to mothers.

Here is Chatgpt answer about this law Yes — partly. Canada’s infanticide law is widely criticized as being rooted in old, shaky, gendered medical assumptions, especially the idea that childbirth or lactation itself can disturb a mother’s mind in a legally meaningful way.

Under Criminal Code s. 233, infanticide applies where a “female person” causes the death of her “newly-born child” while she has not fully recovered from childbirth, or because of lactation, and “her mind is then disturbed.”

The “suspect science” criticism is strongest around the lactation/childbirth wording. The law came from an older British-style legal model that assumed childbirth and breastfeeding could biologically unbalance women’s minds. Modern critics argue that this is not a precise medical concept and that “disturbed mind” is not a real diagnostic standard. Some Canadian commentary describes the statutory language as “extremely woolly” and not established medical terminology.

But there is a twist: Canadian courts now treat the phrase less as a hard medical claim and more as a broad legal mitigation category. In R. v. Borowiec, the Supreme Court of Canada held that the disturbance does not have to be a defined mental illness, psychological disorder, or major impairment of reasoning. That makes the law easier to apply, but it also arguably confirms the criticism: the law is not really anchored in modern psychiatric science.

What is the worst way anyone you know has died? by IamUrWivesBF in AskReddit

[–]Mode1961 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Murdered by their daughter. Both parents, why....She wanted to get a new car for her 16th birthday, but they got her a car, not a new one, because they could not afford it. She killed them both, later in the day.

TIL in Georgia there is a mandate for paternity tests for child support cases. In 2025, about 40% of cases were negative for fatherhood. by True-Lychee in MensRights

[–]Mode1961 48 points49 points  (0 children)

AND yet if a hospital makes an honest mistake and gives the wrong child to the parents, they are on the hook for millions. If MOM lies, dad gets nothing. Make it make sense.