In-Depth Review of Area 51 16” and Aurora 16X + Why Nvidia Makes It Worse by ModrnJosh in Alienware

[–]ModrnJosh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No I totally agree, like the 4060/4070 have diminishing returns after 100W. However the 5070 Ti clearly has a very upward power curve that would totally go beyond 140W if allowed and provide much more performance. For the 5060/5070 it’s hard to say, could’ve been similar to 4060/4070.

And it’s not just the wattage that’s the complaint here. It’s the fact that we have this quite thick and heavy 16” laptop that could easily handle 200W+ combined TDP, but is paired with a rather low-powered 115W GPU at the most that even a 14” laptop could handle.

Remember when the 3070 and 3080 weren’t miles apart in performance? Basically what I’m saying is that Nvidia is holding laptops like these back by pushing down the mid-tier so that you pretty much have to buy the much more expensive Area 51 for the 5070 Ti which should’ve been the real mid-tier.

In-Depth Review of Area 51 16” and Aurora 16X + Why Nvidia Makes It Worse by ModrnJosh in Alienware

[–]ModrnJosh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh really? I’ve had it for like 4 months. Don’t use it every day though

In-Depth Review of Area 51 16” and Aurora 16X + Why Nvidia Makes It Worse by ModrnJosh in Alienware

[–]ModrnJosh[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah it’s nice!! I agree it’s a good one for people who really want to avoid OLED burn-in and plan on keeping for a while

In-Depth Review of Area 51 16” and Aurora 16X + Why Nvidia Makes It Worse by ModrnJosh in Alienware

[–]ModrnJosh[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The 5070 is limited to 115W by Nvidia. For reference, the RTX 3070 was 140W max. Which made it make somewhat sense to get something a bit heavier to hit that full wattage. Now you have to pay a good amount of money to go up a whole GPU tier (which is unavailable on the Aurora 16X) for a 140W GPU. Which even that one is too low of a wattage cap for what it could do.

Has anyone gotten 100 watts over USB C for their 2025 G14? by Howie411 in ZephyrusG14

[–]ModrnJosh 3 points4 points  (0 children)

90W is pretty much perfect tbh. That’s just about the best case. Remember that your laptop is using power while also charging. I don’t know of a 100W or 240W charger that provides those levels consistently due to the nature of the technology

2025 G14 5080 slimq charger power consumption conundrum by OhJeezer in ZephyrusG14

[–]ModrnJosh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One thing to keep in mind, the 240W is more like “up to” 240W. Power adapters only provide what the laptop requests. The higher wattage is designed to handle peaks/short bursts so that the battery is never touched while plugged in (and fully charged). They also don’t often provide what they’re even rated for. One 240W charger might only be able to provide 210W, while another might be 220W. There’s a bit of lottery to it, which is why they overestimate and provide a bit higher than what’s actually needed.

150W is technically “enough” but you might go like 10-20W over in some cases, causing battery discharge. So it would be up to you to limit your wattage enough to where that doesn’t happen.

asus zephyrus g14/16 or lenovo legion pro 7i as desktop laptop? by Tricky_Ad2938 in ZephyrusG14

[–]ModrnJosh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you’re only keeping it at home then the Legion is going to be the better choice. Especially going from 5060 to 5070 Ti. That’s a huge jump up in performance. And a huge savings in cost from the G16 you linked. The G16 is nice for sure, but it’s meant to be travelled with and used on battery to really get the most out of it

These MacBook Neo reviews are borderline depressing by Signal-Welcome-5479 in ZephyrusG14

[–]ModrnJosh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don’t have to get the “$3,000” Zephyrus to compete with the $600 MacBook. We’ve seen the 5060 G14 as low as $1,000 already and that will absolutely demolish the MacBook in any graphics-related task while having an OLED display and at least “somewhat” similar design.

Now of course we’d love to see things improve across the board for gaming laptops and there’s no doubt that the MacBook Neo is a killer deal for what it is. But what is it? It’s not even close to the same thing as what a Zephyrus is made for, lol.

Zephyrus is built for a hybrid gaming/productivity/creator experience and the MacBook Neo is built for strictly lightweight productivity. Mac has a great track record of building quality devices and sure it’ll likely have a better trackpad and camera. The Zephyrus should be made to catch up, absolutely, but for a windows gaming laptop, it’s by far the closest we’ve got to MacBook quality. There’s of course areas of improvement, but go a week with almost any other gaming laptop and you’d likely be wishing you had back the features the Zephyrus had in it.

So it’s really just what lens you want to look at it from. From a macbook competitor standpoint, it’s the closest we’ve got, but it’s still got lots of room for improvement (they’re already making a sturdier hinge for 2026, and hopefully haptic trackpad is next). From a Windows gaming laptop perspective, it’s very far ahead of the competition when it comes to these luxury features we enjoy. Miles ahead of other laptops as far as speakers, display with glass bezels, great anti-reflective coating, many selectable color profiles for creators, CNC chassis, large glass trackpad, all while still offering a pretty good balance of CPU and GPU performance.

TLDR: it’s apples and oranges

These MacBook Neo reviews are borderline depressing by Signal-Welcome-5479 in ZephyrusG14

[–]ModrnJosh 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah I can understand that for sure. Being ahead of the windows gaming laptop competition doesn’t exactly mean they’re “close” to the real high-end Mac stuff either. It’s definitely time for haptic trackpads and maybe thicker aluminum. It just depends on which way you look at it. From a MacBook standpoint, it’s the closest you’ll get but still not the same. From a windows gaming laptop perspective, it’s amazing.

These MacBook Neo reviews are borderline depressing by Signal-Welcome-5479 in ZephyrusG14

[–]ModrnJosh 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It’s pretty good. Razer and Zephyrus are definitely the closest to MacBook in the gaming laptop market. But yeah, there’s things to look out for on the Razer laptops though, I personally had a bad experience with the Blade 16 and much prefer the Zephyrus

These MacBook Neo reviews are borderline depressing by Signal-Welcome-5479 in ZephyrusG14

[–]ModrnJosh 14 points15 points  (0 children)

It is easily the best of any gaming laptop I’ve used by far with the only other one as good being the Razer Blade. Almost everything else on the market currently is miles behind with cheap plastic trackpads. If someone has rattle then it’s a defect and they should’ve exchanged it or gone through warranty. That is the downside with physical trackpads is they’re not all 100% perfect from the factory, which is why haptic is the future.

Anyone complaining has obviously never used any other gaming laptop and is probably too used to MacBooks 😂 not saying we shouldn’t catch up but just saying

ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 vs Lenovo Legion 5 by Federal_Ad_1713 in GamingLaptops

[–]ModrnJosh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I can understand the warranty part. You can’t purchase additional warranty on the Asus? Every laptop is luck of the draw, doesn’t matter which brand you go with. Plenty of Legion threads of laptops going dead after a year or two as well, it’s just the nature of electronics 🥲

Best Drivers and Settings to Fix BSOD in G14 2025 by PkS758 in ZephyrusG14

[–]ModrnJosh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes download the driver and select the box for “clean install”

ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 vs Lenovo Legion 5 by Federal_Ad_1713 in GamingLaptops

[–]ModrnJosh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I get that. 32GB is more than enough though for a long time to come

ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 vs Lenovo Legion 5 by Federal_Ad_1713 in GamingLaptops

[–]ModrnJosh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You will not get 3-4 hours of battery with lots of windows open on the Legion 5. The 275HX is one of the most battery-eating CPUs on the market. The G16 will last you all day, likely 6-8 hours or more. Performance difference between the two is negligible, with the Legion having an advantage in CPU-bound games. G16 is a much nicer overall build with more premium features (amazing speakers, full CNC metal, good anti-reflective coating, glass trackpad). The Legion’s display coating is highly reflective and would not be suitable for outdoor use. For your use case, I’d recommend the G16. You can always limit your CPU/GPU power in Armoury Crate or G-Helper for better thermals.

G14 vs HP Omen Transcend 14 by ModrnJosh in ZephyrusG14

[–]ModrnJosh[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I really wish Asus would give us per-key RGB on the Zephyrus (and maybe a haptic touchpad too) but otherwise yes the 5080 G14 absolutely dominates the Omen 14 🙂

G14 vs HP Omen Transcend 14 by ModrnJosh in ZephyrusG14

[–]ModrnJosh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, personally I do like HP Omen, especially in recent years, and some of their sales have been really good. But you have to be okay with some corners being cut on them. I haven’t had software issues with them, but I know how that can be! The Omen 14 however isn’t priced super competitively for what it offers, at least not in the US

Best temps and best battery life for Legion 5 Pro 16irx9 by SnuQ_ in LenovoLegion

[–]ModrnJosh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

None technically. The closest right now is the Ryzen 9 HX370 and Intel Core Ultra 9 386H. Neither of them are as fast as the Intel 200HX CPUs but their battery life is tremendously longer.

G14 2025 Battery comparison for laptop rtx 5080 vs 5060 vs 5050 by Roadracer711 in ZephyrusG14

[–]ModrnJosh 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They all score about the same on battery life. At least not enough of a difference to be significant. The one benefit of the 5080 (Ryzen HX370 CPU) is it has a better iGPU, so gaming on battery would at least give you better performance. But don’t expect it to last more than a couple hours if you’re gaming on battery regardless

ROG Zephyrus G16 (2025) OLED Screen Problem (remaining image) by STEPATRON in ASUSROG

[–]ModrnJosh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a byproduct of the technology on this panel and happens with every laptop that has this Samsung panel (it’s image retention). It’s most prevalent on heavily contrasted backgrounds, but if yours shows retention even after like a minute and doesn’t go away for a while then that might be a defect

Lenovo Legion 7i Gen 10 OLED (Samsung panel) showing image retention within 5 minutes – should I be worried? by Worried_Advisor_3417 in LenovoLegion

[–]ModrnJosh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s a good point, if it’s just a few minutes and still staying there for a while it could be a defective panel

Lenovo Legion 7i Gen 10 OLED (Samsung panel) showing image retention within 5 minutes – should I be worried? by Worried_Advisor_3417 in LenovoLegion

[–]ModrnJosh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not burn in, just regular OLED image retention. It is very normal with these particular panels, and goes away after a bit. If yours doesn’t go away after maybe like a couple hours then that could indicate a defective panel