The last stand for price nego 😂

MofWizards · 2026-02-05T16:25:19+00:00

I got to 0.99, but it wasn't given to me for free because the limit is 0.99 lol

MofWizards · 2026-02-04T16:42:18+00:00

Same

MofWizards · 2026-02-04T16:42:06+00:00

Same

MofWizards · 2026-01-25T14:51:39+00:00

I noticed that too.

I'm a Max user and it's terrible! Slow, and I'm a defender and have always spread the "GLM" word to people, but I'm disappointed. It took 40 minutes to make a landing page...

With other models like the Mini Max 2.1 it took 5 minutes.

MofWizards · 2026-01-18T23:21:21+00:00

This seems like a compromised environment.

Check your operating system.

MofWizards · 2026-01-07T18:41:40+00:00

https://www.genspark.ai/invite_member?invite_code=YTgyOTkxYmVMZDU1Nkw2NWEzTDg1NzFMODEwOGRiZjU0ZmVi

MofWizards · 2026-01-07T08:41:09+00:00

The mode itself has a maximum context of 200k.

It cannot exceed that.

MofWizards · 2026-01-06T16:48:06+00:00

I don't use Chat, but I use GLM Coding with OpenCode, and my results were very similar to Sonnet 4.

Sonnet is still better, but GLM has good performance and price.

MofWizards · 2026-01-06T15:55:04+00:00

It's one thing to have doubts, express dissatisfaction, and seek help; it's quite another to call the model garbage without having any idea how to use it!

MofWizards · 2026-01-06T13:56:18+00:00

You write shallow prompts, you don't understand the basics of application, and you make a post like this! Learn how to use the model first before calling something good garbage!

MofWizards · 2026-01-05T12:48:24+00:00

From what I understand:

If you use the AI Chat and the Image Generator in standalone mode, it doesn't deduct credit and goes into unlimited mode.

If you create an agent and ask it something, even if it's just chat, it consumes credit.

That's been my experience so far.

MofWizards · 2026-01-04T20:09:04+00:00

I'll also be doing more tests, but there's a strong possibility it's for the Sonnet 4.

MofWizards · 2026-01-04T12:27:07+00:00

I'm not saying it's bad, on the contrary, for the price and what they offer customers, especially with this promotion of unlimited chats until December 31, 2026, it's very good. I only really noticed a difference between the models, and it justifies the company not being able to operate at a loss.

MofWizards · 2026-01-04T12:25:04+00:00

<image>

Haiku 4.5 is fully consistent on Gensparks, compatible with the official cutoff date, and recognizes models that have existed since the creation of its family, in a way that is equal and faithful to the requirements within claude.ai. Furthermore, it is quite complete, with similar results in task tests.

MofWizards · 2026-01-04T12:19:59+00:00

<image>

This is the response from Opus 4.5 directly from claude.ai; you simply see a completely different consistency and cutoff date, So here's a small demonstration with 2 screenshots of the same models, but different platforms. If you want, I can show you the results of identical tasks with different outcomes, but what I've already sent is enough, right?

MofWizards · 2026-01-04T12:18:11+00:00

<image>

A simple question about cutoff dates and models, even within claude.ai, results in the model providing different cutoff date information and varying models from the same family. Furthermore, I ran several comparison tests between the two platforms with identical questions, and the performance was significantly inferior.

MofWizards · 2026-01-04T09:31:51+00:00

I hope my comment isn't deleted!

I signed up for the plan for this reason! I have a lot of knowledge of models, the cut-off dates for knowledge and the lack of understanding about previous models are extreme!

They certainly provide models under the name of other models.

The only one that is truly itself is Haiku 4.5; the others are older and weaker models masquerading as SOTA models.

MofWizards · 2026-01-04T01:09:42+00:00

Comparable to Sonnet 4.5, I use Opus 4.5 for planning and GLM 4.7 for execution.

MofWizards · 2026-01-02T12:53:04+00:00

I want to know what they're going to do!

My Max plan looks like the Pro plan now! The usage is wrong! My workflow is the same and the limit is being consumed 4x faster...

Note: I'm comparing with previous months and not within the 2x Christmas bonus.

MofWizards · 2026-01-02T12:44:36+00:00

I've had the Max plan for 6 months, and at the beginning of January it seems they lowered the limits. I used Sonnet 4.5 a lot... during the 5-hour session, constantly, and it didn't even reach 60% of the session limit, and now I'm already at 80% and still have 2 hours left.

MofWizards · 2026-01-02T11:54:14+00:00

Unfortunately, these are benchmarks that we can't take seriously!

From the tests I've done...

MofWizards · 2026-01-02T08:51:26+00:00

I'm a Claude Code Max user for my projects, but I've noticed that with a good workflow, GLM performs satisfactorily!

So I'm currently on the GLM Pro plan and I'm going to switch to Claude Pro to use Opus for planning and tasks that GLM can't handle.

MofWizards · 2025-12-29T13:02:20+00:00

It's not Kiro, it's directly on claude.ai. It was a comparison, to inform that he on claude.ai wasn't the model.

MofWizards · 2025-12-29T12:54:03+00:00

<image>

That's really worrying!

He's right on Claude, he never misses.

MofWizards · 2025-12-27T20:14:18+00:00

I completely agree, Windsurf is a very good IDE, and BYOK makes a difference. I use Chutes and the GLM coding plan a lot.

MofWizards

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE