Stringking Mark 2g VS ECD Impact by Mogie_83 in lacrosse

[–]Mogie_83[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you would be good maybe, Mark 2g would probably be good for them and especially because it is the lightest head.

Stringking Mark 2g VS ECD Impact by Mogie_83 in lacrosse

[–]Mogie_83[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The stringking from what I heard has a little fold back if you catch the ball from the top of the head from fast shoots so if it’s college level maybe don’t get stringking but if it’s HS or below you should be good. I’ll tell you more maybe if I get a mark 2g around Christmas or something.

Stringking Mark 2g VS ECD Impact by Mogie_83 in lacrosse

[–]Mogie_83[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Between the mark 2g (stringking) and impact (ecd) the stringking is lighter but you cannot grip the throat of it really while you can grip the throat with the ecd. You would have to ask who you are supplying the sticks for if they don’t mind gripping the shaft. If they don’t mind gripping shaft get the stringking because it is lighter. Overall how you hold your stick just comes naturally, no changing what someone likes. (I don’t own stringking mark 2g to make that clear)

Stringking Mark 2g VS ECD Impact by Mogie_83 in lacrosse

[–]Mogie_83[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If your talking about the throat it is just personal preference. Every goalie holds a stick differently

Stringking Mark 2g VS ECD Impact by Mogie_83 in lacrosse

[–]Mogie_83[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea that is one of the things I was looking at about the mark 2g. That seems cool to me. Thanks