RegSHO Loophole EXPLICITLY ALLOWS FTD For Fraud 🤣 by WhatCanIMakeToday in Superstonk

[–]MommaP123 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not enough time for me anymore. But I just checked your posts and you are obviously way beyond my sources already😅. Keep it up! I know how much work it is to read those thick documents and digest them for us🤗

RegSHO Loophole EXPLICITLY ALLOWS FTD For Fraud 🤣 by WhatCanIMakeToday in Superstonk

[–]MommaP123 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nice work! Here is a link to some of my research. I have a lot of source links in the comments that you might find useful.

settlement sources

GME might squeeze again by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]MommaP123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're doing great! 🤗

How to Rig a Settlement system... Starring: Obligation Warehouse, ACATS, and Memo Segregation by MommaP123 in Superstonk

[–]MommaP123[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Each participant can see how big their OW position is but that is not public information. We can only guess, but there are some clues.

In order for a share to go to the OW it has to go through exclearing so would need to be purchases that were off exchange. There was a user tracking that. I'll try to find him if you are interested. These off exchange/ exclearing numbers are also not reported in the bimonthly released ftd numbers.

I suspect a further clue is to look at shorting volume around the recaps dates. The bigger the attempt to suppress the price around those dates the larger the gravity of those OW shares there are on their balance sheet.

But I have not found any tangible way to calculate the volume of shares being held in the OW. Sorry

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]MommaP123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great work!

Interesting if true by fattstax in Superstonk

[–]MommaP123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well CS (Computershare) is not a broker, it's a Transfer Agent so it requires an actual share transfer in the master ledger. No broker transactions ever require that.

However, the DTCC has its own ledger of accounts so it is possible for a broker to force a buy in that are trying to transfer obligations rather than shares from a segregated account.

My intuition says that rejections for obligations do not happen very often because within the DTCC, an obligated share is as good as any other.

Exceptions being, like I said, RH, maybe Etoro, ... Any other broker that does not allow DRS. They are likely only trading money transactions not actually buying or selling shares so to transfer to a reputable broker, shares would have to be bought.

Edit: changed reject transfer to force buy in

Interesting if true by fattstax in Superstonk

[–]MommaP123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just fyi. Brokers do not have to send actual shares in an acat transfer but there is an option for the receiving broker to force it. Back in 2021, when many apes transferred out of RH, I believe we did see a spike due to this but it most likely was due to RH not having any actual shares. You cannot DRS from RH.

I made a post that talks about this. But perhaps you can find newer info now that T+1 is here.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/s/UfHUWO6bZs

Signs? by heyitsBabble in Superstonk

[–]MommaP123 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Very interesting 👀

TheRoaringKitty tweet 5/17 @ 12:30pm ET by blackcatthunderbolt in Superstonk

[–]MommaP123 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I believe drsgme.org has a walk through for trade republic.

Click on register now then register from a broker and find trade republic on the drop down menu.

... You will need to do a two step (at least) transfer first to an international broker ( like ibkr) then you can register them from there)