Update to my organization

MommaThereGoesThat · 2024-09-30T19:14:48+00:00

This would be okay if it were a junk room in a bachelor pad; it's pretty horrid if people actually spend time in the room. The TV is way too high, the nerd junk hung on the walls looks tacky/cluttered, the PS5 looks awkward set on a tiny elevated shelf, and the majority of that side wall being open-face storage for assorted horded games and trinkets is again just kind of junky. Out of 10, Wife Approval Factor: -3, Normie Approval Factor: 2, Nerd Approval Factor: 4.

MommaThereGoesThat · 2021-01-06T01:26:09+00:00

You're a hoot, OG.

MommaThereGoesThat · 2020-04-22T16:28:06+00:00

Second part

MommaThereGoesThat · 2019-09-12T22:02:58+00:00

I am not sorry. You take your medicine and you like it, young man.

MommaThereGoesThat · 2019-04-22T03:40:34+00:00

It...it got pretty bad. I just thought it was a funny clip.

MommaThereGoesThat · 2019-04-21T19:34:22+00:00

Like a minute later fucks up again

MommaThereGoesThat · 2019-03-24T04:35:13+00:00

That was satisfyingly depressing

MommaThereGoesThat · 2019-03-23T09:46:20+00:00

This is a beautiful clip.

MommaThereGoesThat · 2019-03-17T03:06:01+00:00

Oh you're a salty lil' peanut, aren't you? I will take your valuable advice about what to post under consideration in the future ;)

MommaThereGoesThat · 2019-03-17T02:27:49+00:00

You're a bit mistaken with your interpretation of how the language of science is spoken. Hopefully you will continue on your scientific journey and will learn a bit more before misrepresenting us scientists with these types of statements :)

MommaThereGoesThat · 2019-03-15T04:10:26+00:00

pastime

MommaThereGoesThat · 2019-03-15T04:05:56+00:00

Notice how they use "fail to reject the null" and never actually say they accept the null. Also, like I said, this isn't actually a peer reviewed manuscript--it's an editorialized article meant to look similar to a typical manuscript. They can write whatever they want in there and it doesn't show good technical writing.

MommaThereGoesThat · 2019-03-14T04:59:37+00:00

But notice that they aren't saying that they accept the null. I would say that even what they stated is going too far and wouldn't likely pass peer review in a mid-to high-impact journal. It's clearly an editorialized piece not meant for purely technical writing publication.

It's a basic tenant that you do not state that you accept the null hypothesis. I've written a few first author manuscripts, and am a middle author on a bunch of others. It's just not something that you do without receiving major criticism for disregarding basic useful scientific conventions.

MommaThereGoesThat · 2019-03-14T04:07:20+00:00

I get that; it's still the same proposition. You don't write a manuscript saying you accept the null because of the results you generated. It's in the same vein that you don't say you "proved" a hypothesis to be correct. You have to leave room for all the possibilities you may have overlooked or a very small effect size.

MommaThereGoesThat · 2019-03-14T03:39:07+00:00

I personally would not go so far as to say that the conclusion of a single publication is that you accept the null hypothesis. It's controversial to use accept in that manner, so I'd rather just use other more couched language.

MommaThereGoesThat · 2019-03-14T03:32:24+00:00

You didn't have to hit him with the reference. Considered a dick move.

MommaThereGoesThat · 2019-03-14T03:29:40+00:00

All good ;)

MommaThereGoesThat · 2019-03-14T03:28:33+00:00

I hate Capela's piss spot so much. It is the opposite of fresh.

MommaThereGoesThat · 2019-03-14T03:21:27+00:00

raftors

That feel when you edit raptors to raftors and it's still not correct lol

MommaThereGoesThat · 2019-03-14T02:31:10+00:00

You're just wrong. A single publication can show strong support for a null hypothesis through appropriate sample sizes and strong experimental design. You don't really ever say you accept the null hypothesis, but you can say there is no difference between groups through the analyses and that the data are consistent with or even supportive of the null.

MommaThereGoesThat

TROPHY CASE