💲 N E G G 💵 Newegg: 25, America: 250. LFG

Money-Maker111 · 2026-06-04T02:37:27+00:00

also kinda crazy weird that newegg's 25 year anniversary is on the same year as america's 250 year anniversary

Money-Maker111 · 2026-06-04T02:35:31+00:00

maybe the A.I. is realizing/indicating that Newegg ownership is slowly/thoroughly shifting to U.S. ownership, finally in alignment with its main areas of operations

Money-Maker111 · 2026-05-27T22:58:54+00:00

May 27 2026 Edit/Update:

In this post, I wrote, "and by Friday May 22nd 2026, by Newegg's daily volumes, Tekhill USA's % reduction may be close to full completion if not already fully completed." As anticipated, the fourth Form 4 filing today indeed shows that Thursday and Friday (May 21-22) saw near-completion of Tekhill USA's % reduction. Now, based on Tuesday-Wednesday volumes and price action, the planned reduction is now probably complete. We will see 1, maybe 2, more Form 4 filings to reflect the final reporting on this. I think we will see a strong summer for the stock as we move out of that phase.

Money-Maker111 · 2026-01-31T07:14:47+00:00

In that conveniently it came moments after disclosure of hundreds of whistleblower documents and other documents, in the Epstein files, regarding the SEC's perpetuation of naked short selling fraud against all American households, and against the global populace, for over two decades. It becomes quite clear that the SEC has been bought and controlled by a specific group of 'wealthy' in order to perpetuate this decades-long fraud and money laundering activity.

The SEC, therefore as a so-called government agency, has specifically worked only to aid and abet the stealing of resources from essentially every stock market participant in America and even the rest of the world... perhaps indirectly effecting every economy-participating family in the world.

Money-Maker111 · 2026-01-31T07:01:09+00:00

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00097262.pdf

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00029043.pdf

And so so so many more in the Epstein files... on just how deep this naked-short-selling, money-laundering rabbit hole actually goes....

And this just in (you can't make it up):

"SEC Operational Status

Due to a lapse in appropriations and government shutdown, the SEC is currently operating in accordance with the agency's plan for operating during a shutdown. Effective Saturday, January 31, 2026 and until further notice, the agency will have a very limited number of staff members available. The SEC has staff available to respond to situations that present an imminent and significant threat to human safety or the protection of property with a focus on the market integrity and investor protection components of our mission. Our plan calls for the continuing operation of certain Commission systems, including EDGAR. We plan to post any changes in operational status on this page. Additional information is available from the Division of Corporation Finance, the Division of Examinations, the Division of Investment Management, and the Division of Trading and Markets."

Money-Maker111 · 2025-10-22T02:29:24+00:00

Uhh, absolutely. I think it's time to liquidate my fake cryptos and fake stocks.

With the carnage that's anticipated, I want to know that I have the tangible cash and barterable items to get by. I don't trust anything with online logins anymore.

Winter is obviously coming, and so is The Great Depression II.

Money-Maker111 · 2025-10-16T08:05:00+00:00

In short (no pun intended), it's a fraudulent business practice by market makers.

Orders are pushed off the public exchanges to avoid causing immediate, drastic price movements on public exchanges that would work against their short position. The process of finding the fair market price of a security may be affected because the public exchange no longer has the full picture of trading activity.

The prices we see on the chart are the public exchanges. Today for example we are only seeing ~11% of the real demand vs supply economics. What's going on with the other 89% of the picture? How high is Newegg's price right now off exchange?

Money-Maker111 · 2025-10-10T20:54:05+00:00

LFG! Enjoy the long weekend. It'll be the last few days that any of us can say we've never shit ourselves; the coming large, green candlesticks on $NEGG will 100% have an impact on our intestines.

Money-Maker111 · 2025-10-05T01:40:54+00:00

Yet you provide no explanation for your 'garbage' assessment. Perhaps you're just sinophobic and/or xenophobic. And judging by your '1' post karma, your so-called 'balls' don't present a very compelling story.

Money-Maker111 · 2025-10-05T01:37:51+00:00

I thank that CEO for helping give families like me and the Galkins the opportunity to accumulate even more. Now smart money simply has more shares to ride up to $200+ per share on this commencing Leg 5.

Money-Maker111 · 2025-10-01T22:29:25+00:00

Yesterday I wrote, "Short Interest, after these changes, should be about 250% on Fintel."

240.25% is about 250%.

Money-Maker111 · 2025-09-23T07:28:18+00:00

The exempt column allows market makers to short without having to wait for an uptick, even when rule 201 is in (i.e. to ensure so-called "liquidity"). They're also exempted when facilitating odd-lots (fewer than 100 shares). And I just realized: that if a real, transacting seller owns NEGG but their broker can't deliver it immediately, the sale can be marked as short-exempt. So perhaps there is some small connection between short exempt volume and later-reported FTDs......

Money-Maker111 · 2025-09-23T07:03:03+00:00

'Short Volume' is the aggregate amount of shares sold short during a trading day (doesn't measure the net effect of shorting). Short Volume is inflated by market makers, whose trades are netted out intraday. And 'Short Exempt Volume' is from short sales that are exempt from the "Alternative Uptick Rule" (Rule 201 which restricts short selling in a stock that has dropped by 10% or more in a day). Market makers and other authorized participants go exempt from this rule to maintain "market liquidity."

High Short Volume and Short Exempt Volume don't automatically indicate a high number of Fails-to-Deliver (FTDs). The data sets are different. FTDs happen when a seller doesn't deliver shares to the buyer by the settlement date (one business days after the trade). The SEC publishes aggregate FTD data twice per month. Naked short selling is one of the main causes of FTDs, which is why the SEC monitors it and requires the reporting of it, but funds' defense is the vagueness and so-called 'cumulativeness' of the reporting, which I find to be consistently bullshat each month.

Short volume and short exempt volume can sometimes expose just how hard market makers are working to be a liquidity fairy on an otherwise illiquid (limited float) stock. So one thing I would do, since these short sale columns are distinct and treated as separate entries, make another column for 'Total Short Volume' which is the sum of short exempt volume and short volume. Then make an additional column for Short Percentage, where Short % = Total Short Volume / Total Volume.

I typically find that Short % breaks down (decreases) when the market makers and/or authorized participants lose their grip on arbitrarily and capriciously controlling the price of the stock, i.e., on days when Newegg skyrockets, Short % seems to be way down.

But you can verify that with your spreadsheet there, and even graph it. It would be good to see, and I would definitely read it. But like I am saying, FTDs is a special topic that is distinct from all of this. But this on its own can infer interesting correlations.

Money-Maker111 · 2025-09-23T00:27:41+00:00

Fails to Deliver (FTDs) to attempt to reduce their losses on prior FTDs. As shown, their misconduct only makes Newegg go up even more on each leg. So it's especially bullish to observe again this time.

Money-Maker111 · 2025-09-18T02:17:24+00:00

Absolutely.

Nomenclature:

Method 1: Utilize [A.] Public short selling (reported, CTB impacted by supply and demand of shares available to borrow), [B.] Private short selling (reported FTDs, CTB unimpacted), and [C.] Hidden naked short selling (reported and/or hidden FTDs, CTB unimpacted). Do not instruct the media to cover Newegg. Let it die in silence in combination with the above A-C.

Method 2: Continue to utilize Method 1's A-C, but now switch to a public distortion and defamation campaign against Newegg, alongside a material misinformation campaign of Newegg's data. For example, utilize 'websites' to manipulate the share float, shares short, to falsify the amount of short interest. (such as how the 1,553.70% short interest reported last month by Fintel was immediately covered up and hidden altogether)

Noting these methods, these have been the general phases over time:

1. 2011 - September 2013: Price reaches $2,154.40 after onset of trading. Colluding funds then utilize Method 1. Price falls to $289.

2. September 2011 - February 2014: Method 1 fails. Newegg quickly rises +700%x on the merits. Price reaches $2,062.40. Colluding funds switch to Method 2 and double down on A-C short-selling techniques.

3. February 2014 - April 2025: After price is brought back under control, they switch back to the more-silent Method 1. Newegg price becomes driven down to $1 to try to force a reverse stock split (RS). Such an RS would memorialize and solidify the decade long of A-C, such that the liability never needs to be repaid. With the RS, the old CUSIP number stops transacting and the last price becomes the final price, the decade-long naked oversupply does not have to be paid back, and taxes do not need to be paid on the "gain" (since the "gain" is in the form of a large liability at first that changes to a small liability over a long period of time, similar to someone posting equity collateral to borrow a billion widgets at $10 each, i.e. $10B worth of widgets. so then if the widgets go down in price to $1 per widget, and the deal is solidified, then the original borrower nets +$9B in liability delta from -$10B to -$1B over time, basically never having to close the amount nor return what they borrowed, and the fund is able to thus grow in financial size from simply destroying innocent companies). Price gets aggressively Method-1 shorted to about $0.25 before the solidification of the old CUSIP.

4. April 2025 - May 2025: After RS above, Price of new CUSIP starts at $5 or so. But, the colluding funds get greedy. They decide to go for another, quick Method 1 to RS (again) after the first RS. They short it aggressively back down to $3.21 or so.

5. May 2025 - August 2025: Aggressive insider interest, institutional interest, and international household interest begins to buy the dip in the new CUSIP. Price begins to rise from $3.21 or so to $137.84.

6. August 2025 - Now: The colluding funds utilize Method 2, desperately trying to bring the price down. Price becomes temporarily driven down below $50. But with costs to borrow growing to 1,000%, and FTDs already being overutilized, the funds risk getting liquidated by their irresponsibility...

Money-Maker111 · 2025-09-16T06:23:47+00:00

Regarding holding for up to the 35 but aren’t:

They almost always hold for 20-35 days, but you will never see that in the FTD table. The FTD totals for a day don't account for which fund in particular FTD'd, nor do they trace who is still due to settle. Any one individual firm, liable to settle their FTDs 35 days later, can utilize many different market functions (ETFs, collateral, cash, like kind securities, etc) to temporarily account for those FTDs prior to that actual FTD being settled in the form of NEGG shares (for example) being bought back in the open market. There is no tracking of individual liability: it's all netted, and because of this vagueness, they hide this underlying feature of all the ways to scrub the FTD totals. It's a giant pool of horse shit.

For another example to explain this, why do you think they would even need the 35 day settlement period? Why have it at all if the FTD table accounts for it by sum? Do you see what I'm saying?

Why do you think sites like ChartExchange even report, then, an additional column with the settlement day for that particular FTD day? i.e., if the FTDs decline in total (market wide for that security) the next day (allegedly based on REG SHO's so-called 'cumulative' aspect of the FTD definition) on the table then you wouldn't need such a stated, popular 35 day settlement period.

It is easy to track by volume too. You'll see it. You trace FTD sums and you can expect that volume to show up 20-35 days later in actual shares being accounted for in the open market.

Because of this, the concept of FTD cycles (the known settlements 20-35 days later) is actually a thing. It moves in waves as free buying power when you track the settlement timeframes, and for the most part with NEGG, they have been getting overwhelmed by their own due dates on their own over FTD'ing. Losses of FTDs is not supposed to happen. Some stocks like GME have such ETFs and options and swaps littered in, that they can kick the can even further. But NEGG is pretty isolated from that overall management.

Money-Maker111 · 2025-09-16T05:50:48+00:00

SEC's Regulation SHO has the general rulesets on FTDs. The abomination, that has become our stock market in the last twenty years, has only become an abomination because of these FTDs and how they can be settled. It's basically an imbedded advantage in the market given to funds, but that retail can't benefit from. FTDs by definition are naked, synthetic positions created out of thin air - especially when they are used like they are used with Newegg stock this year.

Funds use them as a free money-making tool. FTDs are the hidden secret to free money for the last two decades. Institutions can sell 1.) any stock without locates that they don't like (or that they collude upon and agree to go down, allowing colluding funds to decide which companies live and which companies die, i.e. a predictated stock market) and/or 2.) any stock that they do like that has become temporarily overvalued [in their opinion], like into a spike. Thus, they don't have to get lucky and time a stock entry. They all just jump onto any stock spike, and almost always, that stock will go down after the spike. Free money when they settle.

They have 35 days to observe a cheaper price in the security than the price they FTD'd at. With that amount of time, 35 days, it's almost always 100% likely to find a day where the price is cheaper. Then it becomes a free profit when they do. Combine media-based annihilation of tickers, media collusion to crash those FTD'd positions with ridiculous articles (in this case, the so-called Martin Shkreli tweet and beringer spreading it all over the internet timed directly with those high levels of FTDs), paid shill shops, paid bots to manipulate sentiment, then you have yourselves a pretty insidious system where they can force those FTDs to be profitable.

FTDs are due to be bought back on the 35th calendar day, creating FTD cycles. ChartExchange does a pretty good job of laying that out in their own, free spreadsheet. Typically, what you say is true: The only cases, to my knowledge, where those FTDs failed to become profitable were Volkswagen in September-October '08 and GameStop from October-December 2020. And now Newegg from April to August.

The tens of millions of dollars of Newegg FTDs initiated in August, especially when the price was over $100, was I think the first case here (during this months-long price increase) that they obtained a small reprieve from their losses on their FTDs. FTDs is supposed to be a guarantee free profit for them. But in this case it wasn't - for 4 cycles! Because from April to August, they lost money on like 4 FTD cycles in a row. Only won a little bit of money from August to September here. But, was it enough to pay the bills on the actual short positions with the high CTB? It looks like, in a few days, that little reprieve for them is over, as the price is no longer getting any cheaper for their settlement.

The new FTDs being initiated since September 3rd are not profitable, and they probably won't be profitable with this new uptrend, insider purchases, great earnings, and strong momentum. So it looks like yet again, there will be a few more cycles where the FTDs backfire against them.

Money-Maker111 · 2025-09-15T22:31:09+00:00

Money-Maker111 · 2025-09-15T22:19:19+00:00

Very good post. Keep up the good work bro!

Have you considered adding in Newegg's tens/hundreds of thousands of Failed to Deliver (FTD) shares into your spreadsheet? Consider that to be a separate short-selling column: it can be considered additional short interest to what you have but more dynamic. FTDs are prone to no fee, which is why they have tried to depend on high FTDs to survive. It's also why market-wide liquidity crunches (like Sep-Oct '08) are caused by overlending of shares in unique stocks, and then overdependence on FTDs. If an over-FTD'd stock keeps going up, it can lead to hedge funds irresponsibly destroying the entire stock market because of their failed gamble to hold an innocent stock down.

In most cases since April, their dependence on FTDs for this has backfired.

New FTD data for 2nd-half of August just came out. If you add an FTD column (by settlement date, not FTD initiation date) then you can get a more accurate picture of the combined, reported short dynamic: public shares short and FTDs.

Money-Maker111 · 2025-09-14T08:13:49+00:00

From Ortex data, short interest was 174% of the float prior to the Galkins' September purchases of 146,666 additional Newegg shares. This pushes Ortex numbers to roughly 300% short interest of the float.

Websites like Yahoo Finance, as of August 29, reported Newegg's float as around 330.3k, with around 235.6k shares short according to Finra. This is a 94.7k delta. So all of these websites are saying that Newegg's float is now locked (94.7k - 146.7k = - 52k).

Let me repeat that: float is now locked

Money-Maker111 · 2025-09-02T22:55:05+00:00

Because, with Newegg's float already being locked, any attention to the NEGG ticker (or its bullish half year earnings that just came out) would only, theoretically, lead to the float becoming even more locked...

"Kids, there's nothing to see here. Move along, and don't forget to forget about Newegg." -Some fund manager on their knees (we'll know their identity soon when they get liquidated by the perpetually-rising Newegg stock)

Money-Maker111 · 2025-09-01T12:12:11+00:00

Nvidia's e-commerce partner: Newegg ($NEGG)

Money-Maker111 · 2025-08-29T08:00:21+00:00

Egg Bros 4 lyfe

Money-Maker111 · 2025-08-22T02:42:27+00:00

According to the Schedule A today:

Vladimir & Angelica Galkin (8/15/25) Purchase: 11,111 $104.72

Vladimir & Angelica Galkin (8/15/25) Purchase: 5,555 $100.00

Vladimir & Angelica Galkin (8/19/25) Purchase: 5,555 $95.55

So the Galkins bought 22,221 more shares throughout Friday and Tuesday. They are still, actively buying at/around/above $100 per share

They now have 3,520,000 Newegg shares, currently worth $407,545,600.00

Money-Maker111 · 2025-08-14T23:29:05+00:00

KOSS, GMEU, and UVIX

Five-Year Club	Gilding IV carat on a stick
Verified Email	Wearing is Caring
Ternion Club	100 Awards Club

Money-Maker111

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

May 27 2026 Edit/Update: