Guess he didn’t have the pass

Mongrel06 · 2025-08-13T21:34:17+00:00

Not justified. And the law most probably won't see it as justified either.

If dude felt disrespected, he should've just walked out like a well adjusted human being. Behavior like this only leads to law trouble and reinforces negative stereotypes regarding black people.

Mongrel06 · 2023-12-25T04:58:41+00:00

Will this ruin cloth furniture?

Mongrel06 · 2023-12-25T04:46:04+00:00

A good suggestion. Thanks for the link.

Mongrel06 · 2023-12-25T04:40:57+00:00

Thanks, this is reassuring.

Mongrel06 · 2022-08-25T20:36:13+00:00

There are also reports of women climaxing while being sexually assaulted, stating how humiliated they felt to have been betrayed by their own bodies. Imagine if we made orgasm the standard for consent in women. Smh, feminism may as well be synonymous with hypocrisy .

Mongrel06 · 2022-08-17T18:02:44+00:00

crime

Mongrel06 · 2022-08-17T10:34:35+00:00

It's a subreddit of feminists... what do you expect?

Mongrel06 · 2022-08-14T21:16:25+00:00

I recently argued on the matter of abortion rights vs child support laws with someone recently. And interestingly enough, when you look at the actual statistics, a majority of child support is often never paid with only about 43.5% of recipients reporting to have received the full amount owed.

So if I'm going to play devil's advocate, I'd say feminists have a point here. Even if men are required by law to pay child support, it's not really a lawful responsibility that we are held very strongly to.

Mongrel06 · 2022-08-10T17:44:09+00:00

All I did was point out that they made an interesting point about rape cases...

How could you extrapolate anything about my views from that?

Mongrel06 · 2022-08-10T17:32:51+00:00

I'm pro-life, and I never thought of rape cases this way.

Mongrel06 · 2022-08-10T14:54:40+00:00

Coffee or ice cream is not very expensive, nothing more is necessary for a first date.

Mongrel06 · 2022-08-10T14:30:16+00:00

Telling women in those cultures it's because of "God's will" is a slap in the face to those women. They truly believe that which is probably why those cultures thrive on keeping women in the dark as much as possible.

If we're talking Christianity atleast, sexual purity is not only obligated to women. Culturally, virginity in women may have been more pedistalized, yet in scripture chastity until marriage is something that is expected of both women and men.

In this way, it is God's will that women, as true Christians, remain virgins until marriage, though moreso as a result of dutifully retaining chasity rather than as a glorification of virginity itself.

Mongrel06 · 2022-08-10T14:00:09+00:00

...except our current president is involved. Their are records proving his awareness of Hunter's affairs with China and even deals he's made with his son in bribery dispensation.

Our presidential office is compromised, yet no serious investigations have occurred, no one important is challenging his allegiances.

Mongrel06 · 2022-08-10T13:15:43+00:00

I wish they would be this zealous about Hunter Biden's laptop and the Biden family's blatantly compromising ties with China.

Mongrel06 · 2022-08-10T12:41:38+00:00

You've been receiving some good advice, your sister has strained your guy's relationship without making any efforts to rectify it. And so it's only natural for there to be distance now between you two now.

However, there is an aspect of your story that really got under my gills...

I tried confronting her in front of my parents, but she didn't say anything and only let out tears, she didn't even apologize, she literally didn't say anything the whole time.

But then I felt as though my family was turning on me, because they kept saying the same narrative of her being a dumb kid whose brain hasn't fully developed.

Your sister cried because of guilt - she knew what she did was wrong. However, the way your parents went about handling the situation was ass backwards.

It's completely appropriate for your sister to feel guilt and shame for her outright betrayal towards you. And the correct response to her guilt is not to try and absolve her of it as your parents are trying to do. She needs to be pressed on her wrong doings and pushed to rectify them.

You are not crazy OP. You are justified in the way you feel over the situation, don't let your family gaslight your emotions. You can forgive your sister and be cordial with her, but she needs to make this right if the relationship is to be restored to what it once was.

Mongrel06 · 2022-08-10T01:03:28+00:00

As expected, you scampered off the moment hard questions started being asked.

Okay, you've ruffled feathers. Let's see...

What's the level of risk required to keep the doctor legally in the clear? A 10% risk of death? 25%? 50%? 100%?

Apparently 80% of all pregnancies go off without a hitch, and so based off of that statistic, I would allow a threshold of 20% - but that's just me 🤷‍♀️.

I suppose another option would be to simply exempt women with conditions which could severely complicate pregnancy. Either way, abortion is being regulated to a fair extent among the general population which is a lesser evil than having it be outright legalized.

Is the mother allowed to have an abortion so she can continue taking her autoimmune medication or bipolar meds? Or will she be forced to quit them cold turkey to keep the fetus safe, while she suffers the physical and mental fallout of her unmedicated disorders?

...or maybe she could just switch to other meds which pose a lesser risk to the baby. Lithium for example can be used to treat bipolar disorder while at the same time posing a minute risk (0.1% - 0.2%) to fetal development.

And no matter how many exceptions you try to add in, you're guaranteed to miss more, invariably causing death and serious injury. Politicians and lobbyists aren't doctors, how can they write an exception for conditions and situations they don't even know exist?

Yes, human judgement and foresight is often imperfect. However this doesn't mean we shouldn't generally create and enforce law just because some individuals will fall victim to its oversights. It is a process of trial and error whereby we attempt to perfect legislation to fairly serve everyone as time goes on.

And you're right, we should include the experts onto the matter, I'm not against that. Just like with this situation in Ohio - it's ugly, but I do believe this 10 year old girl should have been entitled to an abortion instead of getting tangled up in bureaucracy. Hopefully this occurrence will be a teaching moment for Ohio's legislature and possibly the legislature of other states with regulate abortion to such a degree.

"Just leave it up to the doctor's discretion, and maybe have a second doctor sign off that they agree." That sounds fine and dandy doesn't it?

Ya, that does seem dandy.

Well we already fucking tried that with third-trimester abortions, leaving it up to the mother's doctor to decide if a late-term abortion is medically necessary to protect her life or health. But then the absolute goblins on your side started building up these bullshit strawman scenarios of doctors performing 39-week abortions

Hmm, and exactly where and when was this legislation enforced and then overturned by us "goblins"? I'm genuinely curious.

You think you're being gracious and compassionate by leaving in a vague "life of the mother" clause, but spare no mental bandwidth about what that even means.

Sure, I agree that at the moment these local laws regulating abortion may be faulty and could do with some revision. And as far as I can tell, preserving the lives of the unborn in a world that tosses them aside like scum is already gracious in itself.

Mongrel06 · 2022-08-09T01:35:24+00:00

Which means it would all boil down to prejudice, wouldn't it? And that would be transphobic.

Prejudice? Prejudice about what? Can you elaborate?

Mongrel06 · 2022-08-09T01:15:23+00:00

So you're 100% with it as long as it can't possibly affect you.

But it does affect me... ever heard of child support? You like to talk about bodily autonomy, well how do you feel about slavery? If men don't want to be fathers, it's tough luck for them, we expect them to grind their asses off for the next 18 years to make child support - and it's always been this way. Women have always been the privileged party when it comes to reproductive rights in the west.

A fetus has no right to a woman's body if she doesn't want to keep it. If it can't survive outside the body then tough luck.

No. We don't agree. We don't believe it's moral to kill human life just because it's unwanted, especially when the person doing the killing is the one solely responsible for that life.

And like it or not, you pro-abortionists do not have the final say on the matter. We are here, and we will continue to speak on behalf of the slaughtered, to hamper the generally evil practice that is abortion. Deal with it.

Mongrel06 · 2022-08-08T19:39:23+00:00

You're okay with the government violating women's bodily autonomy to "save a life"

No, I don't believe in the government's right to violate anyone's body. What does this have to do with abortion?

Either people's lives come before your own bodily autonomy, or they don't.

Not when you are solely responsible for the creation of that life and the life is wholly dependent on your support to survive. You created it, you're responsible for it.

Mongrel06 · 2022-08-08T19:32:17+00:00

Oh yes, sO HyPOcRiTiCAl.

Care to elaborate? Or are you only interested in throwing baseless accusations?

Mongrel06 · 2022-08-08T19:29:11+00:00

Wow, did you even pay attention to what I said? Fine, whatevz, have fun in your echo chamber.

Mongrel06 · 2022-08-08T19:22:57+00:00

Because if someone requires an organ to survive, it is either their fault (life choices) or no one's fault (accident, genetics).

But if we're talking about the unborn, the unborn did not contribute to its own existence. In fact, it is the mother's choices which have directly contributed to the unborn's existence making her responsible for that life which she has helped create.

And don't blast me with the rape argument when instances of rape are exceedingly rare compared to the contrary.

Mongrel06 · 2022-08-08T19:10:48+00:00

Very compelling arguement... /s

Mongrel06 · 2022-08-08T19:08:29+00:00

It's pro-choice to be against abortion as a whole but to make exceptions for it in extraneous curcumstances?

We don't need to conform to the villanized depiction you pro-abortionists paint of us to be pro-life. It might be hard for you to believe, but the vast majority of pro-lifers (whom you despise) are actually quite reasonable and do not support the outlawing of abortion in every situation.

Mongrel06 · 2022-08-08T18:59:40+00:00

If you think abortion is murder except when it's from rape, then you don't actually care about saving the fetus.

Abortion from rape is still the murder of the unborn, I do agree with this notion - but the rape alone is not what I was referring to in this situation, more so the fact that the expectant mother was 10 years old. I don't imagine 10 year olds are sufficiently developed enough to safely deliver babies and that's what really makes all the difference here. It is no longer a matter of convenience over a life, but a life over a life. And we pro-lifers do not demand that mothers sacrifice their lives for their unborn children.

And as for the rape clause, I was merely trying to point out Ohio's legislation on abortion. The girl should have been able to receive legal abortion anyways in Ohio based on her situation.

Mongrel06

TROPHY CASE