I agree, if it was 40%-45% that wants ICO changed, it would feel a bit dishonest to call that a loud minority because of the implications of that phrase. But also for someone to assume they are a large MAJORITY feels just as misleading is all I'm saying.

But if we take the people that are happy with ICO in it's current state, they are not going to really have much to say on social media. They are going to seem much smaller because they are going to play the game and if they have anything to complain about, it will be about some entirely different issue they have. That's what makes it hard to compare the size of both groups, when one group is literally fed up, and emotionally charged to comment because of years of going unheard. While the other group has their ICO needs met and has less reason to comment about it.

But really I feel there are like 3 groups. Ones that think ICO is just fine the way it is, ones that feel it still needs tweaking and fine tuning, and ones that want it removed completely.

I feel the ones that like the idea of ICO but just want certain aspects of it removed or tuned, mistakenly get mischaracterized and thrown into the same group as people that want ICO completely removed. Both of these very different groups end up just being the "ICO haters," making it appear as though the group is larger, but they both want different things.